MM Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Type in capitals Q33 NY (this is the number of the first plane to hit the towers) into microsoft word. Highlight it and change the font size to 48. Then, change the font style to wingdings. What do you make of that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nial Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 From... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wingdings "none of the aircraft used on that day bore the designation of Q33" Nial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al4x Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 load of old bullocks as usual http://www.snopes.com/rumors/coincidence.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted September 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 it was in todays newspaper, so it must be true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LXX73 Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 it was in todays newspaper, so it must be true Wasn't the Daily Sport was it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted September 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 it was in todays Metro paper. having been a bit annoyed that they print this stuff, and people belive it, the following email was sent. Regarding the section in todays Metro on page 17, 'The Crazy Conspiracies', you have stated the that the first plane to strike the twin towers was flight number Q33 NY. I would like to point out that this is in fact not true, as you show that it was Flight number 11 in the preivious paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks Also, the theory about changing the fonts to show a picture depicting the attacks, again another hoax leading to people beliveing what they read is true. http://www.hoax-slayer.com/wingdings-911.html Regards, Mr MM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted September 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 and got this back. Thank you for contacting Metro. We very much value your opinions and time. However, owing to volumes, we cannot guarantee a personal response to every email. In the meantime, why not register with us at www.metro.co.uk You can tell us your views on today's stories by adding a reader comment or join the debate at www.metro.co.uk/chat Did you know that you can get E-Metro, our electronic edition, sent direct to your inbox each day? Just visit www.metro.co.uk/e-metro ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail and any attached files are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify the sender immediately and then delete it from your system. Please be advised that the views and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not reflect the views and opinions of Associated Newspapers Limited or any of its subsidiary companies. We make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which may be transferred by way of this e-mail. Use of this or any other e-mail facility signifies consent to any interception we might lawfully carry out to prevent abuse of these facilities. Associated Newspapers Ltd. Registered Office: Northcliffe House, 2 Derry St, Kensington, London, W8 5TT. Registered No 84121 England. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chard Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 it was in todays Metro paper. having been a bit annoyed that they print this stuff, and people belive it, the following email was sent. Regarding the section in todays Metro on page 17, 'The Crazy Conspiracies', you have stated the that the first plane to strike the twin towers was flight number Q33 NY. I would like to point out that this is in fact not true, as you show that it was Flight number 11 in the preivious paragraph. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks Also, the theory about changing the fonts to show a picture depicting the attacks, again another hoax leading to people beliveing what they read is true. http://www.hoax-slayer.com/wingdings-911.html Regards, Mr MM. They all get their terminology wrong anyway, we're surrounded by dipsticks. The Q33 NY flannel wasn't intended to be a flight number, it was supposed to be the registration number of the aircraft, usually appears painted in small letters on the tail fin. American aircraft registration numbers would always start with "N" not "Q", N being the identifying code for USA. The flight numbers are the commercial name given to that flight on that route, i.e. AA11, being American Airlines flight 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted September 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Cklever boy Richard. Lets hope you can outsmart the rays on staurday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.