Sako Quad Owners...

[Paddy Galore!]

yep! personally i think they're way overpriced, my 22/250 cost the same.

[pandamonia]

Yes i could buy the 17hmr CZ 452 with trigger kit and nice mod too and still have change for the scope.

 

shoot as well as any £700 gun.

 

if my bet on whos going to win BB comes in the cost wont be an issue

[WGD]

Bought a new Quad in autumn last year, love it and have had NO extraction problems in .22LR so maybe the problem has been resolved in the manufacturing?

 

I put a fixed mag 6 x 42 scope on mine and that does for both .22 and .17, although I am borrowing a .17 barrel at the moment since GMK haven't had any since September last year

 

Haven't shot an Anschutz and I prefer the quad to any CZ, but that's my choice. If you go for a Quad you won't be disappointed.

Edited January 12, 2010 by wgd

[jonno 357]

This is my bad boy

 

 

Edited January 12, 2010 by jonno 357

[al4x]

nice but personally I prefer my scopes closer to the barrel than that, is that as low as you can go and still be able to change barrels?

[pandamonia]

If you mount the scope as far forward with the mounts as possible so the forward mount touches the end of the dovetail on the action, you can remove the scope in its mounts to change the barrel and then replace the scope perfectly back where it was before without the need for quick release.

 

in theory this should not lose your zero and the microscopic difference in mount placement wont be enough to change ur zero since the ammo is inherantly less accurate

[Evil Elvis]

i REALLY COULDNT BE ***** WITH ALL THE HASSLE OF CHANGING BARRELS, I BOUGHT 2 CZS AND WAS DONE WITH IT.

 

SURELY YOU HAVE TO RE-ZERO EVERY TIME?

[Paddy Galore!]

:blink: i REALLY COULDNT BE ***** WITH ALL THE HASSLE OF CHANGING BARRELS, I BOUGHT 2 CZS AND WAS DONE WITH IT.

 

SURELY YOU HAVE TO RE-ZERO EVERY TIME?

 

 

 

that's because you are common, have no patience, and have no class..