Hammergun Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 No, we should try to pursue diplomatic means and give the weapons inspectors more time they have asked for. OR Yes, Saddam Hussein has not cooperated fully and has had his chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsnuts Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 i think they should go in and kick his *** :ph34r: :ph34r: snipper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.223 Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 I agree go get him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifer Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 yes me to get him and kill him :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob G Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 He has to be stopped and our boys will do it :ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 one thing that occoured to me at work today,these mps and backbenchers that are resigning,are they the same limp lefty veggies that dont like foxhunting etc.If so bring it on bombay badboy the more the merrier :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkshire Pudding Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 I know this is going to go a bit off topic. But that is the nature of chattin to people. When not if WHEN they do ban hunting with dogs. In all fairness is it really going to stop anybody? How many lads on here hunt with dogs? ie be it out with the hounds, lercher or terriers? And does sending your gun dog in to flush count as hunting with dogs?? oh yea get back to the topic...bomb the swine!!!!! all the best yis yp :ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 YP,you just LURVE that ninja smiley :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harryhawk Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 Finish the job for good this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammergun Posted March 18, 2003 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 Isn't it meant to be "Al Qua'eda terrorist" smilie? :ph34r: :ph34r: :ph34r: YP - sounds as though you might as well go and give up now. Go and get rid of your dogs and guns, go veggie and get some tree hugging practice in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkshire Pudding Posted March 18, 2003 Report Share Posted March 18, 2003 HG lol u need to reread my post (spellin mistakes an all) THEY will ban hunting with dogs...BUT just cos they ban it who is it going to stop ? all the best yis obl :ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red_stag88 Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I think that this is not all about ridding the world of a dictator but if you look at it, after afganistan the US put an oil piipeline in, i think they are doing this for the same reson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigie Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I think this war was inevitable, Bush and Blair had made there minds up to go in regardless of any findings by the weapons inspectors. Going in without the backing of the UN is maybe a little questionable (Bo110x to France) but what really annoys me now is the anti war protestors demonstrating now. No matter whether you think this is right or wrong we should all be behind our forces that are out there. They are the ones we have to think of now. Also dont forget the families left at home, they also need to know we are behind them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I think the fact that Saddam fired a SCUD or two at Kuwait, which I might add are banned weapons, plus the destruction of Iraqi oil wells shows total disregard for UN resolutions and consideration for his people. He knows his time is over so he is prooving Bush and Blair right by trying to damage the Iraqi infrastructure for any subsequent US/UN appointed government. Apparently the latest threat is the blowing up of the dams on the Tigris and Euphrates rivers causing massive flooding. This would displace thousands of Iraqis who would congest roads systems and demand huge amounts of humanitarian aid thus slowing up the advance of coalition forces. Nice bloke! Just the sort of leader a country needs. Is what I'm trying to say is, "Shoot him" and do it quickly before there are too many casualties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest flightline Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I doubt that Saddam`s got much kit or that he Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest flightline Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I doubt that Saddam`s got much kit or that he is much of a threat to us in the UK but he`s an evil swine and should be deposed. Now the Yanks are going in we should support them. And why be on the same side as Harold Pinter, Tony Banks, Jesse Jackson and Glenda? Who`s winding up the schoolkids though? (sorry about earlier post-a bit premature) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranfield Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 Oh No flightline, suffering from premature posting, thats terrible. :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest flightline Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I believe there`s some medical preparation one can use for this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkshire Pudding Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 It's makeing for some fine tele though.... all the best yis yp :ph34r: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil Posted March 21, 2003 Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 Your right there yp,i could hardly drag myself away from Sopie Rayworth tonight :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammergun Posted March 21, 2003 Author Report Share Posted March 21, 2003 I think that the UN could have gone a lot further and really leant on Saddam more. However, now war has started, there's no going back and it needs to be executed as quickly and efficiently as possible. Forces need to get in and get the job done, get some stability and then get the hell out again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.