Pole Star Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 Heard on the news MP's are to debate wether or not to bring back the death penalty,whats your views? Personally i'm in favour of it for certain crimes,multiple killers,child killers,killing a policeman etc, oh and sandbaggers :lol: Any one who thinks the death penalty is a good idea should read Paul Hills book , " Stolen Years " he was one of the Guildford 4 . Or better still, if they were still here ask Timothy Evens or young Derick Bently ( he had the mental age of an 11 year old )& a whole list of now known others let alone the unknown others still in prison grave yards !. I could go on & on ! & what is a hangman any way ?? , why dose he do it ? macabre satisfaction , easy money , macabre farm & fortune , a sense of power ? . He's a disgusting sadistic, grubby plastic mack pervert who is no better than the people he's getting rid off ! . If ever it has to come back then it should be personnel & done by the victims family. OK thats enough lets move on ! . POLE STAR . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silpig5 Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 Yes, I wholeheartedly agree, no-one said it was the easy choice........ As was previously said, if it was me and mine i'd happily kill them with my bare hands, doesn't mean it's civilised though does it? better than bare hands , tie them to a post jono and practice the 600 yd shot on there nads . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR1960 Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 Adi, you make Attila the Hun look like a gay liberal........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silpig5 Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 you should see me in a dress !! but i have got a fan club for my straight talking facebook rants . i only say what others are too pussy to mention ! ha ha ha ha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR1960 Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silpig5 Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 is this a constipated message ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceman Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 what is a hangman any way ?? , why dose he do it ? macabre satisfaction , easy money , macabre farm & fortune , a sense of power ? . He's a disgusting sadistic, grubby plastic mack pervert who is no better than the people he's getting rid off ! . If ever it has to come back then it should be personnel & done by the victims family. OK thats enough lets move on ! . POLE STAR . You should read Albert Pierrepoint's autobiography "Executioner: Pierrepoint" - he followed his father and grandfather into the job and genuinely thought he was doing a public service. He was a quiet and gentle man, far from sadistic. Interestingly though his views changed after hundreds of executions: "I have come to the conclusion that executions solve nothing, and are only an antiquated relic of a primitive desire for revenge which takes the easy way and hands over the responsibility for revenge to other people...The trouble with the death penalty has always been that nobody wanted it for everybody, but everybody differed about who should get off." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highseas Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 proved with out do wt eye for an eye murder = death penalty rape= chop the nuts of theft= thumb or hand of kiddie fiddling in any way =stoned to death buy the relatives then we will all where table cloth`s turbans and be called mohammed,celebrate and demonstrate in the only way we know how thats 10,000 ak47 rounds in the air. the rules stated hear wont and dont work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highseas Posted August 5, 2011 Report Share Posted August 5, 2011 like a great man once said, " a truely civil country can be defined in two ways 1.it has a fleet of nuclear subs 2. it does not have the death penalty and that leaves us with about 2 england and france" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0145wirbelwind Posted August 6, 2011 Report Share Posted August 6, 2011 I haven't got enough faith in our legal system to endorse the death penalty. I can only assume the MPs are talikng about it as they want to slip something through under the radar whilst we are all pointlessly discussing it. It will never be reintroduced. Yes MP are go at keeping your eyes on the left hand when they have the right hand in your pocket. Still for pervs, rapist, just us there DNA and then hang em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pigeon_snIPer Posted August 6, 2011 Report Share Posted August 6, 2011 a big YES - off with their heads. /S/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akita Boy Posted August 7, 2011 Report Share Posted August 7, 2011 There is a flaw in the death penalty debate which never gets mentioned - weak jury members. There is a significant percentage of the population who, if they were on a jury, would not ever return a guilty verdict if they knew the accused would get topped. Even if they were absolutely convinced of his guilt. So you would get a lot more not guilty verdicts and a lot more killers would walk free. Its not just the musili eaters either, a lot of people would react that way. When it came to the crunch they would not have the courage to go through with it. I agree, any trial which quailified for the death penalty as a sentance should warrant a trial heard by a panel of judges, (as has been proposed for complicated fraud cases) rather than Joe "it's easier to make no decision" public. Either that or a X-Factor style vote off system, with the final sentance covered by Sky on Pay-Per-View. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highseas Posted August 7, 2011 Report Share Posted August 7, 2011 I agree, any trial which quailified for the death penalty as a sentance should warrant a trial heard by a panel of judges, (as has been proposed for complicated fraud cases) rather than Joe "it's easier to make no decision" public. Either that or a X-Factor style vote off system, with the final sentance covered by Sky on Pay-Per-View. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pimpkiller Posted August 7, 2011 Report Share Posted August 7, 2011 i wouldnt call jeremy clarkson a great man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berettaman Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Heard on the news MP's are to debate wether or not to bring back the death penalty,whats your views? Personally i'm in favour of it for certain crimes,multiple killers,child killers,killing a policeman etc, oh and sandbaggers :lol: Im with you on that one have been for along long time ,freinds say im too radicalbut when its 100% proven then waste the waste of spaces,oxygen is far to expensive for them Bm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR1960 Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 is this a constipated message ?? No it's a constipated massage, which is completely different..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR1960 Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 like a great man once said, " a truely civil country can be defined in two ways 1.it has a fleet of nuclear subs 2. it does not have the death penalty and that leaves us with about 2 england and france" ...but the french deserve the death penalty so that just leaves us....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berettaman Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 No it's a constipated massage, which is completely different..... Not if you spell it the same it isnt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR1960 Posted August 8, 2011 Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 Not if you spell it the same it isnt No, obviously, which is why i spelt it differently...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.