Jump to content

Brian May?


carpentermark
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Brian May has hundreds of anti shooting letters on his page, I will, like others continue to defend our sport, if you want to brush it under the carpet then that is up to you. And if Brian May wants to delete my posts then he is admitting defeat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian May has hundreds of anti shooting letters on his page, I will, like others continue to defend our sport, if you want to brush it under the carpet then that is up to you. And if Brian May wants to delete my posts then he is admitting defeat.

He's deleted mine already! I guess he didn't appreciate me telling him that he was nothing short of a hypocrite and he really ought to take his head out from up his back side!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's deleted mine already! I guess he didn't appreciate me telling him that he was nothing short of a hypocrite and he really ought to take his head out from up his back side!

 

He is picking his replies, if he does'nt like what you say, he deletes them, I cant understand why mine are still on there, but then I never mentioned where his head was :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you going to let us know what your problem is mate? rather than meaningless jibes every so often.

 

well said carpentermark,,i think he,s on the wrong forum,,,he was meant to be on mr mays facebook page agreeing with him,, ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well my posts on his forum have finally been deleted.

Call the fox vermin and they ban you, I cannot even reply, making it a one sided conversation in their favour shows how narrow minded they are.

As it was on FB I received two requests to be my friend from quacks that had commented on there :no: , hope they all catch mange. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well my posts on his forum have finally been deleted.

Call the fox vermin and they ban you, I cannot even reply, making it a one sided conversation in their favour shows how narrow minded they are.

 

 

It can be very frustrating when people do that.

 

I used to comment on a someone's FB page, who purports to be a leading advocate for 'free speech'. As soon as anyone disagreed with anything he said the comment was deleted and the person blocked. :no:

 

It taught me two things.

 

1/ Like Brian May, the bloke is a massive hypocrite. :sly:

 

2/ It's very easy to set up another FB profile, and continue asking awkward questions. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be very frustrating when people do that.

 

I used to comment on a someone's FB page, who purports to be a leading advocate for 'free speech'. As soon as anyone disagreed with anything he said the comment was deleted and the person blocked. :no:

 

It taught me two things.

 

1/ Like Brian May, the bloke is a massive hypocrite. :sly:

 

2/ It's very easy to set up another FB profile, and continue asking awkward questions. :D

 

Given your current predicament, he probably thinks you're 'armless now :lol:

 

Sorry, I'll get my coat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw him on foxes live. Saying something like "many people feed birds so why don't people do the same to foxes?"

 

I wonder. Maybe because foxes are VERMIN, especially when they live in urban areas. I've never seen a sparrow or a blackbird kill someone's chickens.

Encouraging people to feed foxes does more harm than good.

 

I was waiting for him to blame something on a gamekeeper or a farmer but I didn't watch all the way through. I didn't see anything, but I could be wrong.

 

 

I read somewhere:

If a dog attacks someone, there is public outcry. If a fox attacks a baby, a singer from the 70s jumps up and says "leave that fox".

 

I can't remember who said that originally. Might have been in Shooting Times. Not sure.

 

Edit:

His website says

"And what crime was this animal accused of? According to the man who summoned the executioner, foxes had been 'frightening the birds in his aviary'. It was not established, of course, that this particular fox had ever even been near his birds, and even if it had, by what process was it decided that this is a capital offence? What are we thinking of, here? Without any kind of arbitration or trial, people are able to kill a wild mammal just because they have decided its beaviour is annoying them.

 

This is a crime against our fellow creatures - it's legalised murder, and must must be recognised as such.

 

It's incredible that this man was able to decide that the lives of a bunch of birds (who should not be kept in cages anyway) were more important than a highly sentient and cognisant animal - with a nervous system almost identical to a human, or a dog, or a cat."

 

Are birds not sentient animals, Mr May? Could the fox not have attacked and killed all his birds, causing suffering? You cry wolf about people humanely killing foxes but don't seem to care that foxes rip animals to bits causing immense suffering. At least humans do it quickly and painlessly.

Edited by Reece
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...