Jump to content

Chuffed


sussex lad
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is the results from the very first reloads i have ever done and the first five shots at 100 yards.

 

I am chuffed to bits with the results :yes:

 

The recipe is-

 

Bullet -69grn Sierra Match-king HPBT

 

Case-Neck sized ,Once fired Remington trimmed to 1.760

 

Powder- Vihtavuori N135 23.5grns

 

Primer- CCI Bench

 

Loaded to a OAL of 2.243

 

So looking at the above which way do i go to improve this ??

post-1679-1158088968.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the results from the very first reloads i have ever done and the first five shots at 100 yards.

 

I am chuffed to bits with the results :yes:

 

The recipe is-

 

Bullet -69grn Sierra Match-king HPBT

 

Case-Neck sized ,Once fired Remington trimmed to 1.760

 

Powder- Vihtavuori N135 23.5grns

 

Primer- CCI Bench

 

Loaded to a OAL of 2.243

 

So looking at the above which way do i go to improve this ??

 

Dont take this the wrong way, but are you just measuring the best shots, The other holes to the left, were they shot in the same detail ?

 

i assume this is a .223 load.

 

Steve

 

Looks good so far :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont need improving by the looks. well done mate. :yes:

 

if its not broke.

 

 

 

Loaded to a OAL of 2.243 out of interest, how did you arrive at this measurement please.

 

Mark its about a big as i can go and still get the rounds in the magazine :lol:

 

This is the results from the very first reloads i have ever done and the first five shots at 100 yards.

 

I am chuffed to bits with the results :lol:

 

The recipe is-

 

Bullet -69grn Sierra Match-king HPBT

 

Case-Neck sized ,Once fired Remington trimmed to 1.760

 

Powder- Vihtavuori N135 23.5grns

 

Primer- CCI Bench

 

Loaded to a OAL of 2.243

 

So looking at the above which way do i go to improve this ??

 

Dont take this the wrong way, but are you just measuring the best shots, The other holes to the left, were they shot in the same detail ?

 

i assume this is a .223 load.

 

Steve

 

Looks good so far :lol:

Steve,

To be honest that was the best group but the worst was 0.97in

The other group if you can call it that is, some Federal Tactical Rifle Urban( where do these yanks get these names) 64grn shot at 150 yards, it was about 1.7in.

And yes its .223 shot through my AR15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

youve poked a pencil through a target there !!!!

Shhhhhhh :D:lol:

just a thought and it pains me greatly to say but shouldnt those groups be measured centre to centre? not on the outside edge?

if so they are even better than you thought. still not a proper gun tho :D:lol:

 

Ok then smart **** that makes the group 0.481 :yes::lol: God i'm good :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went to Bisley today to try my new favorite load :oops: at 200 yards and was pleasantly surprised :lol:

Unfortunately no pics as :D before i could ask for the target to be saved the guy i was sharing the lane with put some dirty great 7.62 :good: holes in it.

Any way long story short 3 shots touching and two touching 1/2 inch lower total group size 1 1/4inches :D

So one very happy bunny sitting here :D:oops::D

 

Anyone ever tried 69g Sierra HPBT on fox?? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...