Jump to content

357 lever action


Recommended Posts

Morning all..

 

I'm about to buy a 357 lever action rifle for abit of target and small vermin but on my licence it just says .357 rifle but all the rifles I'm looking at are 357 magnum...do I need to send my licence back to have magnum added??

 

null-28.jpg

 

 

Or is this ok?

 

Rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. .357 on it's own is fine.

 

You should probably have them change it to .38/.357 so that you can use .38 Special ammo in it too if you want to go down that route.

 

What rifle are you thinking of?

 

J.

Not too sure I like the winchesters really...they seem to be the most popular with people...

 

Rich

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd really recommend the Marlin - great build quality (unless it's an early Remlin) and good spares back up in the UK.

 

Rossi's are good value for money, but when you compare the details between that and a Marlin, you can see the difference.

 

Winchester's seem to be the least loved. But the prices reflect that. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too sure I like the winchesters really...they seem to be the most popular with people...

 

Rich

 

Winchesters in .357 have a known problem in that a part breaks - cartridge stop or something, I think. Getting parts is a nightmare. Unbelievably, Browing-Winchester in Europe do not supply parts for them. Getting stuff from the US is nigh-on impossible although I believe there is someone in Canada who will supply them.

 

For some reason lots of LA rifles in .357 seem to display similar problems. Rossi lever actions (which is basically a Winchester copy) seem to have inherent feeding problems although that seems to apply just the the stainless steel ones for some reason.

 

To be honest, Marlin is the way to go but their quality control has gone all to **** since they moved production to the Remington factory in 2008. They are so bad that the UK importer isn't bringing them in at present and they are busy trashing their reputation in the US. If you can find a good second hand one then snap it up!

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd really recommend the Marlin - great build quality (unless it's an early Remlin) and good spares back up in the UK.

 

Rossi's are good value for money, but when you compare the details between that and a Marlin, you can see the difference.

 

Winchester's seem to be the least loved. But the prices reflect that. :)

 

They are still having serious problems. They moved to the Remington factory in 2008 and the UK importers sent back around 30 of them last year/start of this year. Marlin really need to get their game together soon or they will be toast.

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They are still having serious problems. They moved to the Remington factory in 2008 and the UK importers sent back around 30 of them last year/start of this year. Marlin really need to get their game together soon or they will be toast.

 

J.

Friend if mine bought one and couldn't use it as the factory hadn't installed a firing pin. Took months to get sorted too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the octagon barrel rossi in nickle in .357 and bloody love it but expect to go thro a lot of ammo with the grin factor of shooting it. I also need to send my liscience back as the forgot to put .38 on my ammo/gun so when my local dealer ran out of .357 and only had .38 special I was ********

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too sure I like the winchesters really...they seem to be the most popular with people...

 

Rich

 

I have a Winchester in 357 which i love using,but its action is inferior to the Marlins. Mine has had two shell lifters snap and another part which had to be eventually milled from stainless at great cost due to it not being produced anymore by Winchester. However,i dont like Marlins and Rossi's hence why i opted for a Winchester.

 

I will say one thing though-dont bother using 38 special in it as the rifle wont cycle them properly.They are a gnats cock smaller than 357 and you need to push the lever forward a wee bit more. At best you'll simply foul the breech and at worst a live round will slip under the shell lifter so if you try to close the action it snaps the lifter in half.

 

The rifle is designed for 357 so stick with them. Theres nothing stopping you using 357 cases and reloading them with a 38sp recipe like 5 grains of Trail boss or 9 grains of 2400 if you want a bit more power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rifle is designed for 357 so stick with them. Theres nothing stopping you using 357 cases and reloading them with a 38sp recipe like 5 grains of Trail boss or 9 grains of 2400 if you want a bit more power.

 

That's not selling the Winchester well. Unless you're reloading, that makes a big difference to the running costs.

 

If I was gonna get stuck with a bigger bang (and the associated cost), I'd have got the L/A in .44

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's not selling the Winchester well. Unless you're reloading, that makes a big difference to the running costs.

 

If I was gonna get stuck with a bigger bang (and the associated cost), I'd have got the L/A in .44

 

Marlins in 44 mag have oversized barrels so if you decide to reload with cast bullets you'll never achieve the same sort of accuracy compared to factory FMJ loads.

 

Point im making is some guns have an achilles and i was being honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Marlins in 44 mag have oversized barrels so if you decide to reload with cast bullets you'll never achieve the same sort of accuracy compared to factory FMJ loads.

Really?, both Marlins I've shot (owned one of them) with home loaded 44mag would consistently produce groups under an inch at 25M, this was using either 200 or 240gr cast boolits, Kranks GMC lead bullets or 200 & 240 plated bullets. Just about everyone I know who shoots gallery competition loads there own. Same goes for my Henry 44mag underlever, which, if the OP is looking for a decent rifle, is the way to go :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really?, both Marlins I've shot (owned one of them) with home loaded 44mag would consistently produce groups under an inch at 25M, this was using either 200 or 240gr cast boolits, Kranks GMC lead bullets or 200 & 240 plated bullets. Just about everyone I know who shoots gallery competition loads there own. Same goes for my Henry 44mag underlever, which, if the OP is looking for a decent rifle, is the way to go :)

 

Im going by what a friend told me.He has a two year old 44 Marlin and slugged the bore which came out oversized. The Lee mould is too small for his rifle.

Edited by Imperfection
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't surprise me on a 2yr old Marlin, the quality is nowhere near what it was before Remington took production over in 2008. I've seen new Marlins with twisted barrels (foresight angled to one side), rifling grooves with tool chatter marks in and worse. Most probably he has a .429 mould, going up to a .430 or even .431 would be an answer for him as long as it's appropriate to what his slugged size was.

 

The GMC .429 lead bullets from Kranks are very consistent and certainly worth a try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You would think so,but i know of a batch of rifles done by the proof house which still had cosmoline in the barrels!

Proofing in this day and age is almost totally pointless. Modern guns do not blow up as their makers have far too much to lose if they did.

 

I've heard all sorts of stories similar to the above. I have personally seen a Wildcat moderator which was marked .308 by the proof house but had a .223 baffle stack! Now, true, the baffle stack may have been changed but why mark the body rather than the baffle stack it's self? If it hadn't been changed then how did they manage to proof it?

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Im going by what a friend told me.He has a two year old 44 Marlin and slugged the bore which came out oversized. The Lee mould is too small for his rifle.

If that's the case then it should go back. As mentioned before, this is the Marlin quality problem of today.

 

Do you know what the measurment actually was?

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's the case then it should go back. As mentioned before, this is the Marlin quality problem of today.

 

Do you know what the measurment actually was?

 

J.

 

No idea,but he isnt impressed one bit. It shoots fine if using factory FMJ's or stoked up homeloads with FMJ's,but wont entertain cast.It was supposed to be his cheap plinking gun to be used with cast boolits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No idea,but he isnt impressed one bit. It shoots fine if using factory FMJ's or stoked up homeloads with FMJ's,but wont entertain cast.It was supposed to be his cheap plinking gun to be used with cast boolits.

If it shoots factory ammo OK then that suggests that it isn't a problem with the barrel. Do you know what load he is using with the cast bullets?

 

J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...