Surely the media are more guilty of that than anybody ?
Inherently biased (one way or another) they are not adverse to some misdirection, blatant fake news, and often downright lies, to get their preferred candidate into a power position.
The question is, is this down to the media outlets preferred political stance of , A: Its owners. B: Its perceived audience ?
Or is it tied in with a business or ethical interest with one or more political parties ?
I think we can dispense with the idea that they are unbiased, as this is clearly fantasy.
What can be seen , is that often business