JonathanL Posted December 24, 2013 Report Share Posted December 24, 2013 Maybe so but the scumbag doesn't deserve the right for a retrial, apparently it was (2005) the first case in the country where his past convictions was known to the jury before his verdict was decided. It doesn't give me much confidence in a sentence of 35 years being served. So no one ever deserves to have new evidence heard? I don't see the relevance of the rest of what you are saying. What has the nature of the original trial got to do with anything? J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiltsmark Posted December 24, 2013 Report Share Posted December 24, 2013 (edited) It simply means you cant rely on the guilty doing the time imposed on them. New evidence is fine but to use being an Alcoholic as an excuse doesn't cut it with me I'm afraid. Edited December 24, 2013 by Wiltsmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overandunder2012 Posted December 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2013 It simply means you cant rely on the guilty doing the time imposed on them. New evidence is fine but to use being an Alcoholic as an excuse doesn't cut it with me I'm afraid. of course serious new evidence should be heard in any case where someones in prison but the old im a drunk bull****s is a old one and not even worth 1 min of the courts time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sako751sg Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 Ive just read the court transcripts from the summing at the trial and the reading is absolutely as bad as you can imagine,x10.The messages between him and the mothers of the babies are unbelievable and the death sentence should be in place for this kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munzy Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 Being the curious type I just googled this, I didn't realise summary statements are published online. Basically, I didn't get past the first few paragraphs. This evil scumbag and the **** mothers who assisted him have no place in society, now, in 35 years or indeed ever. To say their crimes are the worst imaginable is an understatement; I couldn't have imagined anything even remotely close to this taking place. If everyone in the UK was forced to read the true details of this case from this summary statement I believe we would have a death penalty reinstated by the end of the month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sako751sg Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 Being the curious type I just googled this, I didn't realise summary statements are published online. Basically, I didn't get past the first few paragraphs. This evil scumbag and the **** mothers who assisted him have no place in society, now, in 35 years or indeed ever. To say their crimes are the worst imaginable is an understatement; I couldn't have imagined anything even remotely close to this taking place. If everyone in the UK was forced to read the true details of this case from this summary statement I believe we would have a death penalty reinstated by the end of the month. It was posted on a Boxing forum a couple of days ago and it said it was leaked but nay 100% if that was true. Read it all and hard to digest,especially the messages from the mothers too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munzy Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 It wasn't leaked, it appears some/all documents of this sort are published by the state. I found it here: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk Very interesting site actually, search functionality is good, just reading the summary of Andy Coulson's sentencing. As for Queen versus Watkins... my advice would be don't read it if you have kids and want to be able to sleep at night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuji Shooter Posted November 22, 2014 Report Share Posted November 22, 2014 They should just stop putting the nonces on seg and stick them on the general wing. Soon save a few bob. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandgun Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 It wasn't leaked, it appears some/all documents of this sort are published by the state. I found it here: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk Very interesting site actually, search functionality is good, just reading the summary of Andy Coulson's sentencing. As for Queen versus Watkins... my advice would be don't read it if you have kids and want to be able to sleep at night. thanks for posting that, I havn't read it and dont want to now, Freakmode above, is right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossberg-operator Posted November 27, 2014 Report Share Posted November 27, 2014 Done survey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.