Jump to content

Anyone Remember 'Molyshot'?


Recommended Posts

Nobody?

 

Bit surprised as with an MV of just 1300 ft/sec this had the potential to drop a pigeon at 90 yards with a No 6. I suspect the cost and possible toxicity killed it off but can't find anything about it. I know Kent Cart's were involved with the plain molyshot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody?

 

Bit surprised as with an MV of just 1300 ft/sec this had the potential to drop a pigeon at 90 yards with a No 6. I suspect the cost and possible toxicity killed it off but can't find anything about it. I know Kent Cart's were involved with the plain molyshot.

Not sure but it may have morphed into ITM?.......or something similar?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I can see, no one is even sure that they existed at all. The ITM is Tungsten based which although very dense is also very hard so it has to 'softened' which then reduces that density. I think Hevishot is about as dense as they come but even they don't come close to the Molyshot S. In weight the 'S' No 6 equates quite closely to Lead No 4. I've got a feeling a patent might have been applied for as a preventative measure to stall the opposition. The only reason I asked is because I've just been looking at some calculated ballistic figures for them. The 'moly' - molybdenum - is not all that heavy - so one wonders what the 'S' is. Depleted uranium? :oops: Well, they are being used as shotgun drone ammo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I can see, no one is even sure that they existed at all. The ITM is Tungsten based which although very dense is also very hard so it has to 'softened' which then reduces that density. I think Hevishot is about as dense as they come but even they don't come close to the Molyshot S. In weight the 'S' No 6 equates quite closely to Lead No 4. I've got a feeling a patent might have been applied for as a preventative measure to stall the opposition. The only reason I asked is because I've just been looking at some calculated ballistic figures for them. The 'moly' - molybdenum - is not all that heavy - so one wonders what the 'S' is. Depleted uranium? :oops: Well, they are being used as shotgun drone ammo.

There is some real dense stuff out there. I'm sure you can get shot that is 18gm/cc, whereas lead is a mere 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest cookoff013

There is some real dense stuff out there. I'm sure you can get shot that is 18gm/cc, whereas lead is a mere 11.

Yep.

#9 T18 performs like #1 lead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...