c.mosley Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 Thank you for your email Teal........... Lets get this sorted on the forum to see what your members want. I have posted an article in the forum about the new gun crime bill which i believe you have a problem with ? 1) The article is NOT an advert (which you claim is !) 2) It is a sensible non abusive post. 3) It offers YOUR members information which some may find of interest. 4) This is something YOU should be posting (admin) and not a basic member. 5) The post (in my opinion) in no way provokes a ban.(as you have mentioned) 6) You (as an forum admin) should show an intrest in gun or shooting related issues. Now.............your turn. Explain to me exactly what i have done that provokes a ban? Do you not want your members to have infomation on new gun crime issues ? (Please answer in the forum and not by email........i think people should know exactly what we are on about) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wigeon Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 Teal you are too power hungry banning people all the time for nothing Heres where i get banned for voicing my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb5037 Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 WAHAY!!!! My first day back and there's a cat fight!!!!!! "Ya know, i did miss PW!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogo Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 Thank you for your email Teal........... Lets get this sorted on the forum to see what your members want. I have posted an article in the forum about the new gun crime bill which i believe you have a problem with ? 1) The article is NOT an advert (which you clame is !) 2) It is a sensible non abusive post. 3) It offers YOUR members information which some may find of interest. 4) This is something YOU should be posting (admin) and not a basic member. 5) The post (in my opinion) in no way provokes a ban.(as you have mentioned) 6) You (as an forum admin) should show an intrest in gun or shooting related issues. Now.............your turn. Explain to me exactly what i have done that provokes a ban? Do you not want your members to have infomation on new gun crime issues ? (Please answer in the forum and not by email........i think people should know exactly what we are on about) Because you can't spell Claim! Sorry!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c.mosley Posted June 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 Is that ok for you ? :< ............... Come on Teal..............This is your chance to put me straight ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_whitson Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 Why don't you conduct your private business in private, by email? Fun as it may be to read your semi-literate posts, having a shouting match in a public forum is not the way to solve problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 Why don't you conduct your private business in private, by email? Fun as it may be to read your semi-literate posts, having a shouting match in a public forum is not the way to solve problems. Here, Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c.mosley Posted June 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 instead of being insulted by email i would like to be insulted in the forum . I posted some helpful info on the new crime bill and it was deleted by Teal. So i feel that Teal (Admin) should give a reason to the PW members (not me because it`s not my site ) as to why he dosnt want HIS members to see infomation which may be of use to some people. Am i right in thinking that you agree with this ? For an Admin to delete a post which could be of some use to HIS members just dosnt seem right to me. i have done this for the PW but if you are not intrested then you dont have to read them!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malc Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 I haven't seen the information in question, but I don't need to. If there is even the slightest shadow of doubt that information on any forum, website or anywhere else, shows my sport in a bad light, then get rid of it. This website/forum belongs to Teal and an excellent job he does too. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mel b3 Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 c. mosley , WILL doesn't need to justify himself , it's his site and he can do exactly as he wants,if you don't agree with him you have the same choices as the rest of us my friend , personally i value pw and the effort that teal and ernyha put in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wigeon Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 I haven't seen the information in question, but I don't need to. If there is even the slightest shadow of doubt that information on any forum, website or anywhere else, shows my sport in a bad light, then get rid of it. This website/forum belongs to Teal and an excellent job he does too. End of story. Now come on Teal you own a site, you start a photo section and dont even post your own pic you delete a web addy that has no threat to you site and to be honest you deleted it as it has no money interest in it for you Deleting or banning me shows how big you are you cant handle arguments your probably another keyboard hero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cranfield Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 c moseley, If Teal decided that your post on the " new gun crime bill", was something he did not want on the Site, thats his decision, as has been mentioned, it is his Site. Posting in bold letters, doesn't make anything any different. Wigeon, there have been many pictures of Teal/William on this site, I'm sure if you search hard enough you will find them. The Spam that was posted here yesterday (and on a lot of other Shooting Sites), was an attempt at a free advert and should have been removed (as it has been on other Shooting Sites). There are many things that have happened on this Site, that I haven't particularly agreed with, but I recognise that I have no right to insist that things are done to suit me. If I don't like it, I don't have to come here. I think that is the general rule with most Internet Forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teal Posted June 10, 2005 Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 (edited) Unsuprisingly there seems to be some information left out here. I don't feel I have to justify myself but I will just to clear a few things up. 1) Craig is clearly involved at some level with gundeals the auction website. He has been posting the link to it (advertising in my book) on and off ever since it's inception. I have asked him on more than three occasions to cease this, the first time I have saved in my inbox being in January- but there could have been messages before that. The whole point about having sponsors sponsoring a forum is just that- they get something they wouldn't otherwise at the same time allowing the forum to now exist on a Non subscription basis since March. Obviously why should they pay if others in a similar line of business are getting it for free. It is in the rules which you agree to on signup. But advertisements were in your signature and in a very high number of your posts which has now been edited out- like your post about the new gun bill- it was oriented completely around the link and getting people to go to your website. 2) The post itself was left up with the link removed, it was the link and the nature of some of the content which was the problem - soliciting. I have spent a lot of time getting pigeonwatch to the top of the search engines and trying to maintain the site, people trying to solicit or parasitize off the site is not really appreciated- we have a suggestions forum which I try and read suggestions and act upon the ones which will be good for the site which brings me onto my next point. 3) Not that I feel I have to justify my performance, I have important university exams coming up in 11 days time onwards, I can't dedicate every free minute to pigeonwatch, I appreciate it when people often email me with problems as I often see these before and can check out the site. 4) In response to wigeon's bizarre comments about keyboard hero I should point out I've met up with several people on the site and if you do a search you will find a photo of me and 54 pigeons I shot in march and a photo of me with about 20 rabbits I shot with an airifle last summer and probably several more which I can't remember off the top of my head. I'd just like to thank all the people who have sent me messages of support many of whom have not posted in here, it is appreciated, unlike this unwarranted and uncalled for attack. C. Mosley you are now banned from pigeonwatch and not welcome here and wigeon I honestly don't know what your grievance is, certainly unless you are a part of gundeals I can not see what your problem is here. If you wish to private message something then go right ahead. Edited June 10, 2005 by Teal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts