Jump to content

Pellet grouping


Polish
 Share

Recommended Posts

Been plinking off with my springer today, makes a nice change to the PCP as it is more of a challenge to hit things!

 

So was taking hand held shots rather than bipod mounted at 20 meters or roughly 65 feet.

 

Opinions on my grouping? Need to zero the scope a little better by the looks of things however have managed to keep shots within a 10p coin group :)

 

post-36163-0-68868800-1306709470.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's free standing at 20 metres with a springer you are doing quite well. The only thing that I would do is to adjust your scopes to a POI about one inch higher!

That's looks like a more than acceptable group with a springer mate! :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

case in point a good springer is capable of tighter groups than a pre-charge this is because there is no power curve and they are very, very consistant. thing is they are harder to shoot which tends to disguise that fact :yes: bipods and springers just dont mix :good: tidy hole there btw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say bipods and springers don't mix, if you can tame the recoil a bit you can do really well.

Have a look on AAOC and search "sluggers bipod", pictures of 40 yard groups I shot with a tuned prosport on a dragon claw bipod. 5p size or smaller, well worth trying if only because everyone says it cant be done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

case in point a good springer is capable of tighter groups than a pre-charge this is because there is no power curve and they are very, very consistant. thing is they are harder to shoot which tends to disguise that fact :yes: bipods and springers just dont mix :good: tidy hole there btw

 

 

:hmm::hmm::hmm:

Come on Kent, have I misinterpreted something here, I was excellent with my Springer years back and took free standing 25 yard shots at the 10p size knockdown, and my shooting pall and I were simply knocking then down and back up all day...but the time came for a PCP.

 

Results were much more consistant!

 

Sure, a PCP tails off after LOADS of shots when air pressure is depleted, that is hardly a fair comparison, during it's sweet spell it will destroy a springer!

 

You don't seem to see many Springers in Competition these days!

 

:lol::lol::lol:

 

ATB!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:hmm::hmm::hmm:

Come on Kent, have I misinterpreted something here, I was excellent with my Springer years back and took free standing 25 yard shots at the 10p size knockdown, and my shooting pall and I were simply knocking then down and back up all day...but the time came for a PCP.

 

Results were much more consistant!

 

Sure, a PCP tails off after LOADS of shots when air pressure is depleted, that is hardly a fair comparison, during it's sweet spell it will destroy a springer!

 

You don't seem to see many Springers in Competition these days!

 

:lol::lol::lol:

 

ATB!

 

A misunderstanding old chap. Over the full range of a PCP air reservoir you will find a noticible difference in the power output from fully charged to nearly empty resulting in a wide verticle spread. You don't get that in a springer.

 

However, as you say; taking a five shot group from either type the PCP is more likely to be more accurate in most shooter's hands as springers are men's guns for real men to shoot with whereas any girlie can point and shoot a PCP. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A misunderstanding old chap. Over the full range of a PCP air reservoir you will find a noticible difference in the power output from fully charged to nearly empty resulting in a wide verticle spread. You don't get that in a springer.

 

However, as you say; taking a five shot group from either type the PCP is more likely to be more accurate in most shooter's hands as springers are men's guns for real men to shoot with whereas any girlie can point and shoot a PCP. :lol:

 

Ah,but you don't shoot a pcp from full charge to near empty. You find the sweet spot and near do away with the power curve. Sure, you can get 200 shots like the manufacturer says, but with about a 100 fps spread. Those of us with pcps known that 40 odd shots is the realistic count, and thats just fine for an evenings hunting.

 

Though it is true, springers are a proper mans air rifle :hmm: :hmm: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those of us with pcps known that 40 odd shots is the realistic count

 

Ahem! My PCP has a 500cc bottle on it - the 'realistic count' (from 85% full down to about 100bar) is about 350 shots!

 

But yes, I do still feel a bit of a pansy next to the springer blokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A misunderstanding old chap. Over the full range of a PCP air reservoir you will find a noticible difference in the power output from fully charged to nearly empty resulting in a wide verticle spread. You don't get that in a springer.

 

However, as you say; taking a five shot group from either type the PCP is more likely to be more accurate in most shooter's hands as springers are men's guns for real men to shoot with whereas any girlie can point and shoot a PCP. :lol:

 

 

Yep, pretty obvious, but that's rather like saying a pedal car is better than a petrol driven car as it stops when it runs out of petrol! :hmm:

 

:lol::lol::lol:

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no hestitation in accepting the fact I am a Tart, I always look for the easy option and take every advantage I can get! :good::lol:

 

Good :good:

 

Now, I'm sure that you will also accept without question that the choice of caliber, 22 or 177 is directly related to the shooter's IQ :yes:

 

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody hell I must be a right mess then, .22 springer and Co2 guns and .177 PCP...

 

Thanks for the comments guys, It was free standing at 20m indeed. 10 shot group not rushing anything just relaxed plinking. the PCP comes out for hunting and anything beyond that distance... bipod if needed.

 

Bipods on springers is fine, think about real guns, they use bipods.. I don't see why springers shouldn't. When you hold a rifle you shouldn't fight the recoil and grip hard, so rested on a bipod won't do it any harm and should improve ease of aiming up, unless I'm missing something really important?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody hell I must be a right mess then, .22 springer and Co2 guns and .177 PCP...

 

Thanks for the comments guys, It was free standing at 20m indeed. 10 shot group not rushing anything just relaxed plinking. the PCP comes out for hunting and anything beyond that distance... bipod if needed.

 

Bipods on springers is fine, think about real guns, they use bipods.. I don't see why springers shouldn't. When you hold a rifle you shouldn't fight the recoil and grip hard, so rested on a bipod won't do it any harm and should improve ease of aiming up, unless I'm missing something really important?

 

The target? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...