Jump to content

Why??


farmshooter
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Act states................

 

Barrels reduced so that the Mark does not represent the Proof to be deemed unproved.

 

If any Barrel which shall be marked as proved under the recited Act or this Act shall by any Process of Manufacture, or by any other Means whatsoever other than the User and Wear and Tear thereof, be unduly reduced in Substance or Strength so as that the Mark thereon does not duly represent the Proof which if then duly proved it would bear, every such Barrel shall for the Purposes of this Act be deemed an unproved Barrel.

 

To me shortening a barrel does not unduly reduce it's strength or substance, remembering that length is not substance, therefore I would suggest that shortening does not require re proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the shortened barrel threaded for a moderator then that part of the barrel would be thinner than it was previously, not sure if this is relevant or not.

 

 

This is bang on (pardon the pun) just been through this with Border Barrels with my TRG... if they just shorten it then it doesn't need re-proofing. However, as soon as they screwcut it it does as they are removing metal from the barrel walls and potentially creating a weak spot :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make of this what you will.....

 

http://jacksonrifles.com/zz-silencers/proofcounsel.htm

 

 

Simple fact is over the last couple of years I have Purchased and Sold, cut barrels and screw cut, and NOT subsequently proofed rifles through 2 different RFD with NO PROBLEM AT ALL!

 

It strikes me this is just the Proof Houses trying to generate income! :hmm::hmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have done this.Chopping and/or screw cutting a barrel does not require it to be re-proofed,but if you want to sell it you may be required to have it proofed.The way to get around this is to chop off the screw-cut prior to selling,which automatically brings the barrel back into proof. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello guys, this is my reply from basc

 

It is not a legal requirement for you to have an un-proofed gun, only to sell one but the gunshop (probably as part of the terms and conditions of their insurance) will wish to proof the gun. It will also be their wish to avoid any comeback should the gun blow in your care if they release it to you without proof. If the gun is tested in a controlled environment then it cannot harm anybody if it fails. You have to consent to proof and the dealer should tell you that it is part of the service before work is carried out. It is doubtful they will hand the gun over to you without being proof tested after the work is carried out unless you sign a disclaimer saying you take all responsibility.

 

I hope this is of help

 

 

FS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...