Jump to content

rangefinder


bazzashadow
 Share

Recommended Posts

You can buy a good one that's well reviewed for around 130 pounds like the Hawke 400. Geordie Hunters use one and I'm sure Vermin Hunters Tv are now using the same unit the MTC Rapier2, with illuminated display inside so you can see the range in the dark for around £200.00. Not worth buying something that could be inferior for not a lot less.

Edited by figgy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After many years of service the Deben Hawke 600 finally let go yesterday. My requirement is now limited to the effective range of the Hornet so have just ordered the relatively new Nikon Aculon AL 11 which seems to be well reviewed. Hope it doesn't turn out to be a mistake.

 

 

Would like to know how you get on

Looks the same as my vision king 600 that I paid £90 for. If it is I can recommend it

 

What one the first or second

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a HAWKE 400 and it is great bar the fact that you have to have your finger over the top part of the receiver or everything is 4m away...... was about to bin it when I read a review. It is a bit of a pain but it works so saves buying a new one. I read the 600 does not have the same issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm impressed.

 

It's a 410 compared to the Hawke 12 bore in size. Being a 6 x 20 it gathers less light than the Hawke that being 6 x 25 but the superior optics more than compensate for this - chalk and cheese really. One reviewer said it makes a half decent spotting scope - he was right for shorter range quarry ID. The single push (hold) multiple range/target facility works a treat as does the longest range readout but not obviously if it's a damned great bough in the way.

 

Yep, it's NOT a long range jobby, the screen does not illuminate but it's easy to use and the print-out could not be clearer and for my needs, I could not wish for more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'm impressed.

 

It's a 410 compared to the Hawke 12 bore in size. Being a 6 x 20 it gathers less light than the Hawke that being 6 x 25 but the superior optics more than compensate for this - chalk and cheese really. One reviewer said it makes a half decent spotting scope - he was right for shorter range quarry ID. The single push (hold) multiple range/target facility works a treat as does the longest range readout but not obviously if it's a damned great bough in the way.

 

Yep, it's NOT a long range jobby, the screen does not illuminate but it's easy to use and the print-out could not be clearer and for my needs, I could not wish for more.

 

 

thanks for singing out :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a HAWKE 400 and it is great bar the fact that you have to have your finger over the top part of the receiver or everything is 4m away...... was about to bin it when I read a review. It is a bit of a pain but it works so saves buying a new one. I read the 600 does not have the same issue.

 

I have the same one Nick but have never had that problem.

 

The thing that most forget when looking for any RF is that if you want to be able to accurately judge to any distance "X", you need to by a rangefinder that does twice that distance, as readings become weak to non-existent off vegetation or low reflectivity items as you go further out. I find that my Hawke LRF400 is reliable to 300 yards and that's about it. That's fine for me as it covers the likely max distance I would normally shoot at but I plan to upgrade for a slighty higher mag so I can use one for game spotting and avoid having to carry binos with me as well. For any more distance, a 600 or better still, 1000yd capable LRF would be the ticket.

 

My advice to those in the market is to avoid cheap & nasty and look for one that gives more range than they think they might need. Hawke are good for the money and what many seem to start out with. My LRF400 is up for grabs if anyone might be after one (I'm upgrading to a Leup).

Edited by Savhmr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I have the same one Nick but have never had that problem.

 

The thing that most forget when looking for any RF is that if you want to be able to accurately judge to any distance "X", you need to by a rangefinder that does twice that distance, as readings become weak to non-existent off vegetation or low reflectivity items as you go further out. I find that my Hawke LRF400 is reliable to 300 yards and that's about it. That's fine for me as it covers the likely max distance I would normally shoot at but I plan to upgrade for a slighty higher mag so I can use one for game spotting and avoid having to carry binos with me as well. For any more distance, a 600 or better still, 1000yd capable LRF would be the ticket.

 

My advice to those in the market is to avoid cheap & nasty and look for one that gives more range than they think they might need. Hawke are good for the money and what many seem to start out with. My LRF400 is up for grabs if anyone might be after one (I'm upgrading to a Leup).

big things hanging between your legs

I missed this one in the for sale

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...