Jump to content

Conservative Manifesto


Lloyd90
 Share

Recommended Posts

Edited as missed the reply.

 

 

: still disagree that those 'most fortunate' should effectively be paying 'twice'

Yes, there is no easy solution- some radical shake ups of the system is required and maybe it is time to re-invent the Health Service to the European model of 'top up' Insurance's being in place

Minor maladies and emergencies are always covered regardless of your ability to pay but other requirements are met by the insurance

Edited by Jaymo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Edited as missed the reply.

: still disagree that those 'most fortunate' should effectively be paying 'twice'

Yes, there is no easy solution- some radical shake ups of the system is required and maybe it is time to re-invent the Health Service to the European model of 'top up' Insurance's being in place

Minor maladies and emergencies are always covered regardless of your ability to pay but other requirements are met by the insurance

Turn it around, why should anyone not have to pay if we say state provision should be a safety net for those in dire straits who are entirely unable to contribute?

 

I think an Australian model should be where we head. A state contribution but the individual tops up, either with cash or via insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edited as missed the reply.

 

 

: still disagree that those 'most fortunate' should effectively be paying 'twice'

Yes, there is no easy solution- some radical shake ups of the system is required and maybe it is time to re-invent the Health Service to the European model of 'top up' Insurance's being in place

Minor maladies and emergencies are always covered regardless of your ability to pay but other requirements are met by the insurance

 

If we are so unfortunate as to end up with John McDonald as CotE then we will be paying a hell of a lot more than twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The care for the elderly is one of those subjects which has no easy answer. It is complicated and divides opinion. I subscribe to the notion that you should pay your own way through life, but right at the end, you may lose all you have worked for.

 

I have already posted my opinion, but reading many posts, it is equally easy to see and agree with many points posters have made.

 

Whether this aspect is popular, the Tory manifesto seems to be workable, even though there will be winners and losers. Corbyn and company have tried to create a class war, with some Mickey Mouse costings, for ideas which have some merit, but fail because voters will look at who is peddling them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As people who have assets are expected to fund their care in old age, then would it be too much of the government to expect all fit, able to work people, who are receiving out of work benefits, to work for the government for these benefits, now that would be a government showing true leadership.

Edited by wandringstar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...