Jump to content

Lee Enfield no.4 410, do you use it?


Madhatter2132
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pretty much as the title says.

I'm on a vague lookout for a 410 converted Lee Enfield no.4, mainly as an oddity piece and because I love the Enfield action I learnt to shoot with, I'm just wondering if people out there who have one actually use them and if so what for?

I know it's a vague question but hopefully it may help sway me one way or another, it's that or a smooth bore baker rifle so I can pretend to be Shaun Bean 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Madhatter2132 said:

I know it's a vague question but hopefully it may help sway me one way or another, it's that or a smooth bore baker rifle so I can pretend to be Shaun Bean 

Well i remember when Sean bean was playing Mellors in the BBc adaptation of Lady Chatterleys lover, Me & a bunch of mates were in the pub & it was on the telly in the pub. It came to the scene where Mellors was rogering Lady chatterley doggystyle in the potting shed.

Honestly when that came on the screen the whole pub roared & cheered like England had scored in the world cup, Hilarious!

Chance would be a fine thing these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an SMLE , a 1916 BSA manufacture, bored out to .410. As Enfield Spares notes, it never fed cartridges properly, certainly not now the magazine has been welded, and is a single shot. 
it shoots surprisingly well, great fun on the clays, but, as cylinder bore, strictly short range. It means I can own a piece of history which is still functional.

i acquired a 1907 pattern bayonet, and have to say that fitting it to the weapon is disturbing; the whole assembly is perfectly balanced and swings very easily, not the heavy and unwieldy mass you would expect. To imagine a young lad, shivering in the trenches, waiting for the whistle to 'go over the top', a bayoneted rifle in his hands, is a salutary thought........

7C3625BF-5F09-4609-B2FD-B1B159DE3B14.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrBob said:

i acquired a 1907 pattern bayonet, and have to say that fitting it to the weapon is disturbing; the whole assembly is perfectly balanced and swings very easily, not the heavy and unwieldy mass you would expect.

The Indians knew a thing or two about bayonets. I've had both a  BSA SMLE and an Ishapore SMLE. The Ishapore used its "Indian pattern" bayonet. Shorter handier, better that the British 1907. In bayonet fighting only really in a few circumstances is "reach" superior to "handiness" and the longer bayonet risks your opponent getting inside your guard, but, yes, a fearsome thing is the 1907 bayonet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...