Jump to content

Information on Unknown hammer gun


leadbreakfast
 Share

Recommended Posts

You should be able to date from the proof marks code as here http://www.hallowellco.com/british_proof%20marks%20-%20syntax%20by%20date.htm

 

Be aware that as far as I can see - it has never been nitro proofed. It is also usual to see the working load (e.g 1 1/8 oz) and chamber length (typically 2 1/2"). I beieve these came in to use in 1896

 

Therefore - from the photos - as far as I can tell - it looks like the marks for Birmingham pre 1896. As to maker, I have no idea, but from the engraving etc, I suggest probably a mid priced gun in its youth - and the use of Scott spindle type top lever and Purdey style bolts suggests not before late 1870s (they came in 1865 and 1863 respectively, but were only more widely used rather after the patents expired).

 

My guesswork - not gospel!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be able to date from the proof marks code as here http://www.hallowellco.com/british_proof%20marks%20-%20syntax%20by%20date.htm

 

Be aware that as far as I can see - it has never been nitro proofed. It is also usual to see the working load (e.g 1 1/8 oz) and chamber length (typically 2 1/2"). I beieve these came in to use in 1896

 

Therefore - from the photos - as far as I can tell - it looks like the marks for Birmingham pre 1896. As to maker, I have no idea, but from the engraving etc, I suggest probably a mid priced gun in its youth - and the use of Scott spindle type top lever and Purdey style bolts suggests not before late 1870s (they came in 1865 and 1863 respectively, but were only more widely used rather after the patents expired).

 

My guesswork - not gospel!

Great info, thanks. I've just dated my AB Williams from 1904 - 1925 and my Midland from 1925-1954.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be able to date from the proof marks code as here http://www.hallowellco.com/british_proof%20marks%20-%20syntax%20by%20date.htm

 

Be aware that as far as I can see - it has never been nitro proofed. It is also usual to see the working load (e.g 1 1/8 oz) and chamber length (typically 2 1/2"). I beieve these came in to use in 1896

 

Therefore - from the photos - as far as I can tell - it looks like the marks for Birmingham pre 1896. As to maker, I have no idea, but from the engraving etc, I suggest probably a mid priced gun in its youth - and the use of Scott spindle type top lever and Purdey style bolts suggests not before late 1870s (they came in 1865 and 1863 respectively, but were only more widely used rather after the patents expired).

 

My guesswork - not gospel!

Yea I know it's not nitro, so it's prob 1870s then

Not really bothered about shooting it just like these old ones with history.

Cheers bud👍🏻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lead breakfast

 

Proof marks suggest your gun was built between 1887 - 1896. The number 12 is the bore size has you will know the crossed scepters with a crown above the letter V is the viewer mark .The crossed septers with the crown and letters b,c.p are the proof marks , the BP under the crown is for black powder . The word choke on each barrel is mostly represents a live pigeon gun, the 12C with in the diamond is for a chanber of 2.3/4 inches or more.

The gun is a bar lock with floating strikers and Greener type hammers and well made with a Dolls head rib extension . Although no name on the locks I would say it was retailed by a ironmonger or such and bought in complete from the Birmingham gun trade quite common at that period .

If you in the future you wish to use it with black powder have it checked over by a good gunsmith and should take a ordinary 12 bore load of 2.3/4 drm of medium grain black powder to 1.1/8 oz of shot .

You have a nice looking gun there to use it will be a pleasure

Feltwad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFAIK - "Not for Ball" was used by the Brum proof house till 1887-this was then changed to the 12 over the C inside a Diamond to denote the same warning?

My apology you were right and I was wrong the 12 over c in the diamond does represent choke My research shows several diamonds stamps for proof and I had looked at the wrong one .No offence I hope

Feltwad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No apologies needed whatsoever Sir, proof marks are a Minefield at the best of times but throwing in BP specifics as well causes further confusion. I would suggest getting the chambers measured if the gun is to be used as they are most likely 65/67mm or 2 1/2" in old money. If the OP wants to use it he needs to prepare himself for a shock-Just Cartridges hold the last stock of the Gamebore? BP shells and I'm pretty sure they are over £25/box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not bothered about shooting it, I might turn it into a wall hanger to be honest.

 

 

Please, no!

 

If it's safely and legally shootable keep it that way, deactivation's a very "one way" process. I've a couple of wall hangers but both were deactivated due to their having passed the end of their useful shooting lives.

 

Let's not lose more antique guns than we have to, gun amnesties please take note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...