Vince Green Posted July 7, 2016 Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 (edited) Unbelievably, and totally contrary to British law David Kelly has never had an inquest. It is thought/believed it was blocked by the Blair government. A lot of people were waiting for the Chilcot Inquiry to see if anything came out about Kelly but nothing so far has been mentioned https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Strange_Death_of_David_Kelly The Hutton enquiry into his death contained so many serious inaccuracies and omissions that it needs urgently to be re-examined. In the light of what we now know about how information was manipulated by the Blair machinery it cannot stand. Edited July 7, 2016 by Vince Green Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalahari Posted July 7, 2016 Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 Couldn't agree more. David. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
100milesaway Posted July 7, 2016 Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 Unbelievably, and totally contrary to British law David Kelly has never had an inquest. It is thought/believed it was blocked by the Blair government. A lot of people were waiting for the Chilcot Inquiry to see if anything came out about Kelly but nothing so far has been mentioned https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Strange_Death_of_David_Kelly The Hutton enquiry into his death contained so many serious inaccuracies and omissions that it needs urgently to be re-examined. In the light of what we now know about how information was manipulated by the Blair machinery it cannot stand. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lord_seagrave Posted July 7, 2016 Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 I thought that the Coroner ruled that Hutton took the place of an inquest? LS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Konnie Posted July 7, 2016 Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 Think it will never happen, if those who don't want it looked at would have made sure any facts/evidence gathered is that tainted/currupt, it will be impossible to gleen any truth from the situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFC Posted July 7, 2016 Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 I've no doubt that there's loads of unanswered questions and it probably does deserve a full inquest. However, I can give the final verdict right now and it won't take me seven years and n million words. 'Lessons must be learned' There we are, that will be £2.5million please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Green Posted July 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2016 I thought that the Coroner ruled that Hutton took the place of an inquest? LS No the coroner could not hold an inquest while the Hutton inquiry was taking place because of a conflict of evidence. Subtle difference Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.