les gedge Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 just got this picture back of trentotter from last year when we went to 1 off my rough shoots .3 pheasants 1 hare 1 duck 5 jackdews.les Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karpman Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 Nice mixed bag you guys had ya selfs there mate. Nice getting reminders of good sport! Karpman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davecooper1 Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 Good mixed bag Les Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twitchynik Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 I'm no expert but would those dandelions be flowering a little late? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karpman Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 I'm no expert but would those dandelions be flowering a little late? No reason why they couldn't flower in October if its mild, or maybe later perhaps. And it was mild very. Karpman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garygreengrass Posted May 8, 2012 Report Share Posted May 8, 2012 Nice mixed bag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul223 Posted May 12, 2012 Report Share Posted May 12, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docholiday Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 (edited) Exif information which is embedded in the photo says Taken at 4 seconds 19mins past 12 on the 8th march 2007 nice sharp pic though Edited May 13, 2012 by docholiday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welsh1 Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 (edited) just got this picture back of trentotter from last year when we went to 1 off my rough shoots .3 pheasants 1 hare 1 duck 5 jackdews.les Exif information which is embedded in the photo says Taken at 4 seconds 19mins past 12 on the 8th march 2007 nice sharp pic though Oops Edited May 13, 2012 by welsh1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul223 Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Exif information which is embedded in the photo says Taken at 4 seconds 19mins past 12 on the 8th march 2007 nice sharp pic though That'll explain the early spring dandelions :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Exif information which is embedded in the photo says Taken at 4 seconds 19mins past 12 on the 8th march 2007 nice sharp pic though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karpman Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 That'll explain the early spring dandelions :o Or could be the date and time being wrong in the camera. Why so suspicious? Karpman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docholiday Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Or could be the date and time being wrong in the camera. Why so suspicious? Karpman I cant answer that, and no idea if thats possible, but am sure computers are not infallible, all I have said is that is the info attached to the photo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
les gedge Posted May 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 I cant answer that, and no idea if thats possible, but am sure computers are not infallible, all I have said is that is the info attached to the photo phone dates 1927 wrong again doc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karpman Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 I cant answer that, and no idea if thats possible, but am sure computers are not infallible, all I have said is that is the info attached to the photo Ok the exif is almost blueprinted on the photo at time of exposure, this information comes from The camera so it is possible for the time and date in the camera to be wrong.. Karpman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docholiday Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 phone dates 1927 wrong again doc Looks like we are both wrong its now saying 2027 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welsh1 Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 (edited) The date on the camera is actually 2027. It was taken on a mobile phone,the time on a mobile phone is usually correct as it is updated by the phone signal,it is very strange that the date is so far in the future,as a default most phones are dated as they are made,and again they will automatically update themselves on receiving a phone signal. Some one would have to go into the picture data and change the date. Doc beat me to it,the 2027 date was there yesterday when i checked. Edited May 13, 2012 by welsh1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
les gedge Posted May 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 yes doc just checked date now 13 3 27 .les Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
les gedge Posted May 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 The date on the camera is actually 2027. It was taken on a mobile phone,the time on a mobile phone is usually correct as it is updated by the phone signal,it is very strange that the date is so far in the future,as a default most phones are dated as they are made,and again they will automatically update themselves on receiving a phone signal. Some one would have to go into the picture data and change the date. Doc beat me to it,the 2027 date was there yesterday when i checked. not me mark has bad with phone has i am on the laptop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
les gedge Posted May 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Exif information which is embedded in the photo says Taken at 4 seconds 19mins past 12 on the 8th march 2007 dont think i would be shooting on my birthday in the pub maybe. nice sharp pic though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twitchynik Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 Ok the exif is almost blueprinted on the photo at time of exposure, this information comes from The camera so it is possible for the time and date in the camera to be wrong.. Karpman This is true. What would be interesting would be the EXIF info on images in previous posts and cross referencing that with dates/times in the posts. If date and time on those also shows them to be from a Nokia phone with similar date format then there is a possibility of deducing when particular pictures have been taken and what with. i.e. saying that you just got this picture from your mate doesn't tally up with other pictures that were taken by you. Just saying.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karpman Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 This is true. What would be interesting would be the EXIF info on images in previous posts and cross referencing that with dates/times in the posts. If date and time on those also shows them to be from a Nokia phone with similar date format then there is a possibility of deducing when particular pictures have been taken and what with. i.e. saying that you just got this picture from your mate doesn't tally up with other pictures that were taken by you. Just saying.... Lol alright Sherlock but what's up with just trusting what people say, do you guys check exif on all photos posted lol. Can't understand whilst people seem hell bent on making the op look a out of season shooter. Were has theft love gone lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welsh1 Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 This is true. What would be interesting would be the EXIF info on images in previous posts and cross referencing that with dates/times in the posts. If date and time on those also shows them to be from a Nokia phone with similar date format then there is a possibility of deducing when particular pictures have been taken and what with. i.e. saying that you just got this picture from your mate doesn't tally up with other pictures that were taken by you. Just saying.... Interesting post. I have just looked back through the op's photos that he has posted up,and they are taken with the same camera as the photo in this thread,the very interesting thing is the date time stamp is very consistent,it usually has a day and month within a couple of days of the post,ie if the photo states 2-3 then it has been posted on the 4-3.The strange part is that the year consistently shows as 2027 and they are all taken with the same nokia N86. I would say that the date can be accepted as the day and month are correct by the consistency of the op's posts and that the year has been set incorrectly. Unfortunately the year does not help the op. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docholiday Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 well I will just trust Lez's word over the technology as the phone is giving some strange results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrispti Posted May 13, 2012 Report Share Posted May 13, 2012 well I will just trust Lez's word over the technology as the phone is giving some strange results We should give Les the benefit of the doubt, I dont think he shoots out of season wildfowl with lead shot either He could be using his home loaded 3.5'' #4 lead cartridges for goose shooting in Scotland or fox shooting Although his mate Trentotter did slip up once by mentioning he used Chedite BB's for goose shooting . . . . . . . shame their largest shot size in none toxic was #4 :yp: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts