Jump to content

cannabis made legal


evo
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 345
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just so I'm clear on the proposal for cannabis:

 

1. Cannabis will be supplied by the pharmaceutical industry.

2. The government will tax the supply from the industry.

3. They won't tax the black market supply.

4. There will be some mechanism where people can buy the product produced from the pharma industry but as yet unknown.

5. The supply of a drug from the pharma industry will have to fall under the medicines directive and will need a prescription.

6. THC levels will have to be defined and limited for the industry product.

7. Statute will have to be changed to decriminalise possession of small amounts.

8. International treaties will have to be changed or we will have to go against them in order to allow the sale of a narcotic.

9. DUI and safe limits will need to be defined.

10. Declaration of use may be required for motoring insurance and or other licences.

11. Minimum age of use needs to be set.

 

Just trying to see where we've got to.

 

Don't forget that because there will still be a black market for cannabis and the other drugs then there will still be money spent on law enforcement and there will still be drug dealers making a lot of money from illegal drugs. These points rather undermine the arguments bandied about regarding stopping drug dealers profiting and saving on law enforcement.

 

As previously said; if legal drugs are one penny more or harder to obtain the black market will continue to prevail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so it comes down to pricing? the government would have to sell cheaper so theres no money in it for criminals and they move on to other crimes like they did before they all got into drugs would that possibly be the way it would go in the unlikely event its decriminalized? also im guessing a lot of customers may move on to legal outlets to avoid the criminal element as it seems this effects people of all classes. personally i cant see it legal here but i could be wrong theres been a lot of changes over the last 30 years could be a different place in another 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As previously said; if legal drugs are one penny more or harder to obtain the black market will continue to prevail.

 

Except, as with alcohol and tobacco, the illegal market will exist (always will) it will be a tiny portion of the market, the legal market will prevail.

 

I bet the dealers didn't show them those pictures when they were giving out free samples to get them hooked.

 

Very good point, a legal outlet will not do this. The drugs they do provide ,for the people who take it regardless of legality, will be cleaner and safer doses in a safer environment. And they will ask for ID, Doubt your local dealer will be so pleasant with teenagers.

 

Yep make it easier for them to get hold of the muck makes perfect sense........

 

Harder for teenagers (legal outlets ask for ID, local dealer you want to keep in business doesn't). Adults are big boys and girls now, going to take it regardless. Might as well be safe clean and taxable

Edited by gazzthompson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except, as with alcohol and tobacco, the illegal market will exist (always will) but the legal market will prevail.

 

 

I agree there will be a hefty slice of the legal market. That is why this crackpot scheme is being considered. Wealthy people wanting to make money out of drug addicts. But your points about saving costs in policing and enforcement are blown out of the window unless you can guarantee that the legal side will totally kill off the black market drugs and of curse you can't.

 

The size of the illegal cigarette and alcohol market is debatable in any case. You cannot quantify what you cannot see. I have some experience in this field and there is a lot more coming in to this country than the Government are prepared to admit to. A lot of the bigger seizures are down to pure luck, not intelligence lead operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pretty much agree with every you said (thats a first!) except the last point of the first paragraph. A reduced market will still reduce costs, which is better than now.

 

People are getting and will always get rich off addicts, I just consider tax paying, goverment regulated companies the less of two evils.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harder for teenagers (legal outlets ask for ID, local dealer you want to keep in business doesn't). Adults are big boys and girls now, going to take it regardless. Might as well be safe clean and taxable

 

so by your own admission the young would only be able to get them from dealers illegally as they do now and for dealers to stay in business they would need to target those who couldn't buy legally. Where is this safe malarky coming from there is plenty of evidence drugs aren't safe at all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so by your own admission the young would only be able to get them from dealers illegally as they do now and for dealers to stay in business they would need to target those who couldn't buy legally. Where is this safe malarky coming from there is plenty of evidence drugs aren't safe at all

 

The dealers market will be greatly reduced by adults purchasing legal drugs, Reducing the funding and market and thus reducing the chances of kids having access to a dealer as its not financial viable to be one (unlike now). And I meant safer, if somebody is going to take drugs (and prohibition won't stop that) I would rather they take drugs knowing exactly what's in it and correct usage/equipment than some drug cut with all sorts of **** too add weight and substance with dirty needles (massive fall in drug related HIV in Portugal) and all sorts of ****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part I don't understand about that argument it is widely accepted that some point are violent when drunk, where as I've never seen a violent stoner.

 

If Booze was discovered today, they'd make it illegal.

 

In my experience, people who regularly smoke cannabis are more agressive when they are not stoned. They are paranoid and irresponsible. Cannabis does affect people psychologically so I have to agree with Evo. I don't agree with making it legal and I don't think it would boost the economy of our country if it was made legal.

 

You will have an increase in illegal cannabis if it was to be made legal just like we have an increase in illegal tobbaco and alcohol. Which is actually more difficult to combat.

ATB,

Lee

Edited by lee-kinsman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

If the legal market is the 60's flower power free love kit, I doubt it,

 

especially when the dealers have the super skunk,

 

street credit alone would cater for that.

 

Everything gets stronger over time, take todays trend for super strength shot's purposely designed to get people hammered in a short space of time !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this comes off, which I doubt, do you think the Government is going to supply the super skunk that's kicking about now.?

 

Nope.......though not..

 

Would that be the same super skunk that you CAN buy in countries that have decriminalized cannabis ? assuming we copy someone else's system then yes it would be offered here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the majority of the population is affected pretty much every urban area has issues and the crime that goes with it. The simple facts are you are only considering useage of the middle class who can afford them rather than the under class who cannot and who thieve to gain their supply. What you are effectively saying is the country can benefit from the proceeds of crime by taxing drugs but these people won't buy from legal sources when its still available cheaper on the street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The illegal market will never disappear , the aim is to replace the majority of it with a legal regulated market. Prohibition does not address the issue either, People complain about the apparent results of legalisation even though prohibition fails to solve any of the complained about issues... its strange:

"your idea can't fix x, y and z so let's keep doing the thing that's currently making x, y and z"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the majority of the population is affected pretty much every urban area has issues and the crime that goes with it. The simple facts are you are only considering useage of the middle class who can afford them rather than the under class who cannot and who thieve to gain their supply. What you are effectively saying is the country can benefit from the proceeds of crime by taxing drugs but these people won't buy from legal sources when its still available cheaper on the street.

 

Its simple maths ! if you collect revenue from the people who would use legal outlets you would not only save resources from not having to police them people but you would create more resources to police the criminal element.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...