Jump to content

MPs refute woodcock petition claims in parliamentary debate


Conor O'Gorman
 Share

Recommended Posts

A debate on the shooting season for woodcock held in Parliament yesterday saw MPs push back on claims made under a petition instigated by Wild Justice. Briefings from BASC, GWCT and CA were used by MPs to good effect.

Click the links below to find out more:

https://basc.org.uk/mps-refute-woodcock-petition-claims-in-parliamentary-debate/

https://www.gwct.org.uk/blogs/news/2023/february/gwct-research-highlighted-in-parliamentary-debate-on-woodcock/

https://www.countryside-alliance.org/news/2023/2/wild-justice-petition-fails-to-take-flight

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Conor,

I watched this, and my understanding is that it is a “talking shop” only with nothing being binding to any party.

However, at the end of the debate the lady chair took a nominal vote and decreed “the eyes have it”

My question is what exactly do they have ?

cheers, Tedward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Tedward said:

Hi Conor,

I watched this, and my understanding is that it is a “talking shop” only with nothing being binding to any party.

However, at the end of the debate the lady chair took a nominal vote and decreed “the eyes have it”

My question is what exactly do they have ?

cheers, Tedward.

The “Ayes” agreed by acclamation to the proposition that the petition had been considered. So nobody bound to do anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conor,

WildJustice are trying to put a different spin on this :

Woodcock debate: on Monday afternoon our petition calling for a change to the Woodcock shooting season was debated by MPs in Westminster Hall. This came about because nearly 108,000 people signed the petition - thank you all! The Defra minister, Trudy Harrison, broke the news that Defra has asked Natural England to look at the case for changing the shooting season. This is good  news and we are optimistic that this very important change might be achieved. If it is, then 108,000 people who signed the petition deserve most of the credit.

- your thoughts ?

regards, Tedward.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Tedward said:

Conor,

WildJustice are trying to put a different spin on this :

Woodcock debate: on Monday afternoon our petition calling for a change to the Woodcock shooting season was debated by MPs in Westminster Hall. This came about because nearly 108,000 people signed the petition - thank you all! The Defra minister, Trudy Harrison, broke the news that Defra has asked Natural England to look at the case for changing the shooting season. This is good  news and we are optimistic that this very important change might be achieved. If it is, then 108,000 people who signed the petition deserve most of the credit.

- your thoughts ?

regards, Tedward.

 

At the end of the debate, Environment Minister Trudy Harrison concluded that “Natural England will be making recommendations based on the science”. As stated by CA in their review of the debate - "if it does so, no regulatory change can be expected because it cannot be supported by the evidence currently available".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Conor O'Gorman said:

At the end of the debate, Environment Minister Trudy Harrison concluded that “Natural England will be making recommendations based on the science”. As stated by CA in their review of the debate - "if it does so, no regulatory change can be expected because it cannot be supported by the evidence currently available".

It would be good if all of our governments and associated bodies in the U.K. would follow the science when considering matters of this nature. Very clearly the SNP/Greens haven’t on such matters as grouse and mountain hares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...