Jump to content

Rem260

Members
  • Posts

    440
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

1,050 profile views
  1. The fact it took less than 3hrs deliberation, which allegedly included lunch. Plus the gravity of the offence to which the jury would not take lightly. Would suggest the evidence possibly warranted no charge to begin with.
  2. Why then do we not charge everyone who has a complaint made against them. If you say its about showing fairness to all. Officers having carried out their investigation have to go to the CPS for them to decide whether there is enough evidence for a successful prosecution. This case was clearly pandering to woke politics from a community that thinks they are perpetual victims and societies laws do not apply to them because of it. The CPS who work within the law looks at the evidence and then decides whether to charge based on the evidence. I am sure there are hundreds of complaints every day that are not prosecuted due to a non realistic possibility of conviction. Or should we just clog up the courts in order to show fairness. By prosecuting this case it has delayed justice for another who has had to wait for the court space.
  3. Excellent pics as usual. Thanks for posting them.
  4. Possibly suspected possession of a prohibited samurai sword. You can not own one unless certain criteria is shown. They may suspect he/it does not.
  5. Ring pull can opener ?
  6. That is exactly how the CPS view it
  7. Or the convicted terrorist Nelson Mandela?
  8. Yeah you couldn't make it up. Only this country would come up with something like it.
  9. Apparently those pensioners living abroad under the Brexit deal get to keep their winter fuel payments.
  10. Though he intimated that the left were more tolerable than the right. I would imagine those that have their property destroyed by the left shouldn't feel so bad as those who have it destroyed by the right by his reckoning?
  11. The governments political violence advisor was on Sky news decrying the violence on both sides. Calling out the right wing as thugs and criminals and then those on the left as doing it for noble causes such as Just Stop Oil. I couldn't believe he actually said it out aloud on national TV.
  12. Yes on my Samsung which I think is South Korean. Beat me to it. Although below is North Korean ammo I believe they have the same quality control standards.
  13. Your response to luckyshot was dismissive of his reasoning and questioning his train of thought. You could have dismissed his assertions by using your below answer. ie "we don’t have a motive for this dreadful act." Instead you continued with your general negation "You believe the perp intended a bigger impact from his events than purely murdering and injuring innocent children and adults? Like there’s a bigger end goal?" Which to me sounds like you dismissed Luckyshot's concerns as being a fantasy without any possible creditability. Especially with your closing remark. "Like there’s a bigger end goal?" I have only asked you to clarify your train of thought in coming up with the answer you provided.
  14. Why do you believe he had no motive to carry out these dreadful murders other than he just wanted to kill. What are you basing this conclusion on. You decry others as single minded bigots yet you exhibit the same single minded denials without any evidence to the contrary. As far as I know we don’t have a reason yet for this dreadful act.
×
×
  • Create New...