welsh1 Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 You keep thinking that in your little world you have made up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 dave - any chance of those PMs? You seem to think they are of no use, but still you won't produce them and I'm getting a bit worried. Previously I thought you were merely rather stupid, but now I am starting to think you haven't got the courage of your convictions. Man up. Google the phrase if it is a bit difficult for you. PS - in the North West, I think Panone are top jockeys, in the legal world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 come on mungler still waiting I know you've been on KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 kdubya - I don't need assurances about any PM (or lack of one) from you. I think it fair to say that if you have something to say - you just say it, without sending PMs. :good: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 come on mungler still waiting I know you've been on KW Eh? I thought I was pretty clear the first time around. "Who really cares what KW has been PM'ing him. It's the internet" If you have or haven't been pm'ing I wouldn't know, couldn't find out and don't care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Eh? I thought I was pretty clear the first time around. "Who really cares what KW has been PM'ing him. It's the internet" If you have or haven't been pm'ing I wouldn't know, couldn't find out and don't care so why say it then if you dont care? you always go on about others "manning up" seems its difficult for you though, I aint PM'd him as you on an open forum imply, you are a solicitor are you not so you know what implication means, so why not man up yourself and aplogise? or do you believ its only for others to put their foot in it, mungtastic. KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unapalomablanca Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 its time for peace to break out and time for the 'so angry' thread to be forgotten, its insidious and its spreading poison to other threads and posters.....peace man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 KW I can only refer you to my earlier posts - I really don't care one way or the other. It's not important to me, if it's important to you (and precisely what "it" is I dunno) then I still don't care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 KW I can only refer you to my earlier posts - I really don't care one way or the other. It's not important to me, if it's important to you (and precisely what "it" is I dunno) then I still don't care The "it" is the fact you assumed quite wrongly and for what reason I don't know, (other than I am not one of your sycophants) that I pm.d someone calling you, I don't need to do that, I will say it to you rather than about you, I also differ from you in that if I am wrong I will hold my hand up and say so, you it seem cant manage to do that, its the old if you give it you have to be able to take it scenario, and on that one your colours are well nailed to the mast. KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 I still don't care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huffhuff Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 burnleydave for PM! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clayduster Posted June 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 its tque ime for peace to break out and time for the 'so angry' thread to be forgotten, its insidious and its spreading poison to other threads and posters.....peace man Its been a lovely day in Bolton, I only popped out for a "Light Ale" and I come back to this, It started a critique of Parliament today and has ended up as a bitch fight. Uncivilised but soooo entertaining . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagsy Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Its been a lovely day in Bolton, I only popped out for a "Light Ale" and I come back to this, It started a critique of Parliament today and has ended up as a bitch fight. Uncivilised but soooo entertaining . Thank your lucky stars you didn't go to Burnley, your door may have been smashed in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clayduster Posted June 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Thank your lucky stars you didn't go to Burnley, your door may have been smashed in. Not my bag really, the only reason I go to Burnley is to get my boots fixed, but I must say that Bolton is a great place to be smashing doors in, front or back (Not mine though) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Labour Lords and a Unionist are feeding now also, one an ex- copper, and Jack Cumningham apparently. Always makes me wonder just how much money these people need to earn to be satisfied. They've been milking the gravy train for donkies years and it still isn't enough! I wonder if they ever stop to think why they are universally despised, or even if they care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawkeye Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 I still don't care Well you should care you are keen enough to accuse some one of doing some thing but not man enough to admit you are wrong.. It does you credibility no good even though its only a forum.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 The point is that if PMs had passed I wouldn't know - that's why they are private messages. I couldn't find out and as stated said I don't care one way or the other. Moreover the point is irrelevant - who KW does or does not PM is entirely upto him, if he's offended at the suggestion that he's PM'd someone when he hadn't he needs to get a thicker skin and find something less tenuous to argue with me about - and we know how he loves that. If KW says he didn't PM someone then that's upto him, he could have and then said he didn't. Do I believe him? If I cared it might matter a teensy weensy bit. We've never got on on here and if he told me the sky was blue I would have to stop and check. But then again, it's the internet he's never turned upto any of the charity shoots, he's never been to any of the bisley shoots, I've never met him and he goes out of his way to disagree with everything i say on here - but I'm used to that, I realise this is the Internet and he's not my mate and so once again I really really really don't care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawkeye Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Well the difference is i know KW have done for quite a few years and yes he can be balshie but he says things to your face and if he is wrong he will apologise and admit it .. An attribute you do not seem to have.. You have your opinion and i have mine i trust him to the hilt and so do most people that know him...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unapalomablanca Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Well the difference is i know KW have done for quite a few years and yes he can be balshie but he says things to your face and if he is wrong he will apologise and admit it .. An attribute you do not seem to have.. You have your opinion and i have mine i trust him to the hilt and so do most people that know him...... The very fact that people (me included) converse, argue, advise, laugh with, and insult other people who they have never met, never spoken too and never even seen a picture of is very odd to say the least. Half the time it is boredom, the other half, just for the hell of it. I would find it very difficult to get offended by someone who i just type words to, and who types them back. Its all just b/s through the ether and nothing else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Mike, he's your mate, you obviously know him in the flesh and i doubt that he disagrees with everything you say or do and so understand why you would stick up for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun4860 Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Surely though you can't be suitable to practice law in any way. Yes you might just be an ambulance chaser, but by your book shouldn't people who want to be lawyers not be allowed? I've it a lawyer in the family, she oes corporate law but even still i believe lawyers to be lower than politicians just my tuppence but if you have it a female lawyer in your family, did you then it her doors as well? causing much damage? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welsh1 Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 (edited) The very fact that people (me included) converse, argue, advise, laugh with, and insult other people who they have never met, never spoken too and never even seen a picture of is very odd to say the least. Half the time it is boredom, the other half, just for the hell of it. I would find it very difficult to get offended by someone who i just type words to, and who types them back. Its all just b/s through the ether and nothing else. My thoughts exactly. But would like to add,all the people on here I have met have been nice people,what they think of me is another matter lol. Edited June 2, 2013 by welsh1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overandunder2012 Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 (edited) pw gold staring all the "usual suspects" plenty of button pushing and plenty of jumping priceless Edited June 2, 2013 by overandunder2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted June 2, 2013 Report Share Posted June 2, 2013 Oh no he's not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted June 3, 2013 Report Share Posted June 3, 2013 right my last word on it mungler old chap, you are a solicitor are you not so you should be used to dealing with facts as opposed to assumptions? you assumed I pm'd burnley dave to "call you" and posted your assumption! fact one I did no such thing I have never phoned met or pm'd him simple as. you then accused me of pm ing him and deleting,to hide the fact I "could have" IE make me look guilty, so fact two never deleted nowt never needed too you then assumed an apology meant nothing and tried to make light of it, fact three to me an apology when needed and given marks the character of the man, your character has now been fully assessed. final fact your input into this thread simply shows you as a bully who likes very much indeed to give it but cant take one little bit, the term keyboard warrior is very fitting indeed. KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.