old man Posted November 27, 2016 Report Share Posted November 27, 2016 Not aware of any facts so other than hoping the judge not ga-ga we have to trust the system. However the proposal to recharge cost related to crime back to country of origin would not work any better than the NHS health tourist debacle? That poor excuse for a human is the reason why in nature some parents eat their young....... That comment is beyond me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonmick Posted November 27, 2016 Report Share Posted November 27, 2016 Not aware of any facts so other than hoping the judge not ga-ga we have to trust the system. However the proposal to recharge cost related to crime back to country of origin would not work any better than the NHS health tourist debacle? But surely it is a eu rule.so as such must be followed to the letter by all.or are you saying that some members are not following the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted November 27, 2016 Report Share Posted November 27, 2016 E U rule or not mick, the recharge system from here is not working and never has but i bet it works well the other way round? The health tourist thing is fiddled by bent doctors abroad certifying that women have not been pregnant long enough to be disbarred from flying, guess what, into labour over here within a couple of weeks. All of the NHS care then fingers up and gone home? Fabulous! How do you recharge for criminals who destroy their passports to enable anonymity? If the governments of the day were to work on sorting this mess rather than interfering around the world to raise their pathetic egos and profiles we might get there? Chimpanzees might have more idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
955i Posted November 27, 2016 Report Share Posted November 27, 2016 The punishment fitted the crime which were both meanial. Well so the judge thought, which he no doubt knew more than any of us do. Menial??? Do you do much baby punching? Or is it possible that the judge was a ****wit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
955i Posted November 27, 2016 Report Share Posted November 27, 2016 Not aware of any facts so other than hoping the judge not ga-ga we have to trust the system. Why?? Since when has the 'system' shown any common sense or regard for the people of this country? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 Why?? Since when has the 'system' shown any common sense or regard for the people of this country? Because it's all we have and we are unable to change it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
955i Posted November 28, 2016 Report Share Posted November 28, 2016 (edited) Because it's all we have and we are unable to change it? How wrong you are (no offence intended). These people and politicians are elected and employed to serve the people fairly and without prejudice ensuring freedom and justice for all. Both have consistently for many years failed to do so. Unable to change it? I call that apathy from the sheeple. Edited November 28, 2016 by 955i Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 995i. Me a sheeple, I don't think so. Just send me a pm when you have managed to change something? I agree wholeheartedly about politicians being useless, selfserving, greedy individuals in the main. Maybe. But they have created a system that serves their own purpose only? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 How wrong you are (no offence intended). These people and politicians are elected and employed to serve the people fairly and without prejudice ensuring freedom and justice for all. Both have consistently for many years failed to do so. Unable to change it? I call that apathy from the sheeple. Ha ! The only way we get anything done in this country is by voting them out ,if we are allowed. To then vote in another shower of trough guzzlers to finish the job of the previous lot. Or by rioting , which,in these comfortable days of TIVO and cocoa,is a non starter , unless you are a middle teen sink estate dweller, who needs a new TV. Lets be honest here,if the bloke had seriously punched that baby in the face,he would be doing time,very unpleasant time at that. Whatevers happened ,and for whatever daft reason he has done it,has been blown up by the childs mother and the media. Its that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougy Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 Lets be honest here,if the bloke had seriously punched that baby in the face,he would be doing time,very unpleasant time at that. Whatevers happened ,and for whatever daft reason he has done it,has been blown up by the childs mother and the media. Its that simple. But people believe all that's written in the papers. They can't or won't want to see any different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 He was found guilty of punching the baby. Is the lump on the baby's head a figment of the mother's imagination? If it is, how did the man see it? The baby spent 7 hours in hospital - if nothing happened - why? Whatever force he used, he is one slice short of a full loaf. I'm unclear as to why people are trying to minimise what he did. He did it and got away lightly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewulf Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 (edited) He was found guilty of punching the baby. Is the lump on the baby's head a figment of the mother's imagination? If it is, how did the man see it? The baby spent 7 hours in hospital - if nothing happened - why? Whatever force he used, he is one slice short of a full loaf. I'm unclear as to why people are trying to minimise what he did. He did it and got away lightly. I not looking for an argument,but I havnt read anywhere about a lump ,or 7 hours in hospital. What I read ,was there was a 'mark' on the babys head. If indeed the bay was injured ,then I apologise for belittling the matter. Im not for one moment denying the man isnt right upstairs. It just seems to me ,that a fully grown man punching a baby in the face ,would/should have been dealt with differently. Edit: Just found this http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3813801/Man-63-punched-newborn-baby-FACE-thought-doll.html No excuse,but that baby does look a bit like a doll. Edited November 29, 2016 by Rewulf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/07/shopper-arrested-for-punching-newborn-baby-after-mistaking-her-f/ http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/man-guilty-of-randomly-punching-baby-in-face-at-supermarket-fined-900-a3403121.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougy Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 Typical tabloid. Nice picture, I suppose a picture of him carrying a bunch of flowers for his wife wouldn't have the desired affect as those 2 pints. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon R Posted November 29, 2016 Report Share Posted November 29, 2016 Dougy - agreed. Now where did they get the photo from? Him, family, relative. Only himself to blame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.