Jump to content

Help with cz .22 lr


cluais
 Share

Recommended Posts

What magnification did you have it on? At any mag between 3-9 a normal target should look pretty whopping at 50 yards...

 

This seems very odd indeed. I use a Hawke 3-9 x 50 on my .22lr and shoot up to 100 yards with it no probs, certainly not where the "size" of the viewed target is concerned. The brand doesnt matter where magnification is concerned - 3 to 9 times is 3 to 9 times, ie the same on a Hawke as it is on a Swarovski or Zeiss.

 

You havent mounted the scope back to front have you :crazy:

 

I'm befuddled.

 

ZB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After useing many different scopes. mainly budget & VFM ones I've found the mag is not allways equal.

I always have a look out of the front window at objects at known ranges when I first get a scope & compare clarity with any presant scope I'm useing..

I then mount the scope in the bedroom useing a pylon for a vertical reference, It's a good few miles away.

When a scope says x10, my normal mag, I find some scopes are being a little artistic with the description.

One scopes x10 is the same as anothers x8, or x12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The scope is on the right way i must take it to a range and get some advise maybe its ok,i can see the target its just not as close as i tought it would be.Have to get up each time and walk up to the target to see the bullet holes as i cant see them with the scope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shot at small marks on a white background, if you want to see the holes.

Or dots on bright coloured post-it-notes that works well.

Or.... get some Shoot 'n see's/Dirty Bird type targets, you will holes in those.

 

If you can't see any of those the scope may need a clean, or maybe focusing, have you adjusted the the focus?

A lot of people don't know it is there and leave it screwed all the way in (I won't mention any names on here :good: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny you should mention that. I was thinking of that article last week and looking through old magazines trying to find it, but I didn't have it. I thought it was a good article and wanted to read it again.

 

Get this month's Sporting Gun, there is an article on it. Not that I'm saying the shooting press keeps recycling the same articles :yes:

 

Mind you, I keep on buying it.

 

ZB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...