TIGHTCHOKE

From your link "The only valid conclusion that could be drawn from the study is that out of 356 pheasants sampled 62% were shot with lead ammunition, 4% were shot with non-lead ammunition, and 34% were shot with either lead or non-lead ammunition or something else"

Blimey, good luck without the long number on your receipt.

Good for you......

That really takes "marking your territory" to a new level.

Which is no basis for the current situation.

Amen to that...................

Should suit you perfectly then.

Careful with that humour thing, you'll be foxing a lot of these guys.

Good point and heavier loads too.

No, not Conor, he was speculating that Rewulf had multiple accounts on here.

Very nice.

We used to have a BASC representative called David some years ago....................................

Yes it is, isn't it...............................................

Hopefully the strength of feeling is becoming apparent.

No, not at all, what the good Doctor needs to do is answer the questions posted of him.

Blimey, what an awful state of affairs.

Gordon Bennett, it is a debate with two sides asking questions of the other.

If it is Vetch, I hope it hasn't been drilled in to land that will become waterlogged.

What was your score?

Not if they are a problem and need thinning out.

No, he's quite busy reading all of the VOLUNTARY TRANSITION AWAY FROM LEAD posts.

Oh come on this is far more important than life or death.

The Global Partner element, laughable while they continue to claim sovereignty of the Falkland Islands.