Newbie to this

Because people were too thick to realise, it was always going to cost them money, and voted yes to a mayor. And it is still going on today, more government only means, more bureaucracy and money to pay for it. It was made clear, the mayor was going to have the power to raise funds. That only meant one thing, more tax, sorry charges. Perhaps Londoners should use the mayor's logic on referendums. I think the turnout was around 30%, and close. Edit - Just checked and it wasn't close. Around 70%, but was only a 34% turnout. Voter apathy strikes again.

He should be fired.

There is a lot of sense being said on this thread, sadly it will mean nothing, unless we stop voting for more of the same.

Or lack of capability, as in this case.

This is the bit that covers the sale of cartridges, to someone at a ground, shooting under the section 11 exemption then?

I'm assuming this would be covered under the section 11 exemption.

This ^^^

Christ, quick you better inform your home insurance of the flaw in yours and everyone's buildings.

Yes, it's a legitimate business expense.

So there's no problem then Multi-choke gun becomes fixed choke and the world keeps turning.

Good point, so you end up with a shorter fixed cylinder choke gun 😂

The sleaze is strong in this one, my guess is the hypocrisy will be as well.

Or simply learn good gun maintenance. You end up with a fixed choke gun 🤷‍♂️

My local RFD does the show (or did, not sure if they still do). At their first show he reckons he lost about £2000, but when I said, so it was a waste of time then, he replied, not really, I got rid of a load of old stock, that would probably have never sold in the shop, and the loss, is a business right off. He saw it as a win 👍

Got to agree with this, I'd say at least 80% of that audience were already going to vote Cons. As for listening to Sunak..... well after about 30 seconds you switch off.

Because they do not want to control our borders. Legal immigration proves that.

+1 And yet somehow Labour will manage to.

A1 are normally there

Maybe contact the importer, which is Highland Outdoors, they may be able to help. Rim Fire had a 308 in it, so it will definitely fit a short action 1500

VAT can only be charged, if the VAT on the original purchase was claimed back. If the original purchaser hasn't claimed the VAT back, then no VAT can be charged on the sale. If they have claimed the VAT back, then VAT has to be charged on the sale.

That only applies if you are VAT registered and have claimed the VAT on the purchase back. None of this will change.

This just about sums it up, and shows the stupidity of those who allowed it to happen. Didn't BMW take one of their car manufacturers to court for copying one of their cars, and the judge just dismissed the case. They do not adhere to international law. What happens in China, is judged only in China.

Yes, there is that. We need a 'none of the above option', make them go away and have a rethink.