Newbie to this

^^^ This 💯%^^^

I would

I wonder if the petition has reached the 10% yet. Shouldn't take long.

Surely you mean, slap on the wrist, this afternoon

I get that, my point is the argument of even if it only saves one life........then it's worth doing. Even if the law abiding are effected. Well we can all agree that sadly legally held firearms are used to kill. Thankfully it is very rare. Well.......if removing legally held firearms saves just 1 life, surely if you apply the same argument, then , it has to be worthwhile......... Be careful what you wish for people.

That's not what I meant. Appy the "if it saves one life it is all worth while" argument to removing private ownership of firearms.

Now apply that to private ownership of firearms.............

Easy money, for doing nothing. Some will jump at a chance to part with their hard earned. Might be worth reporting him as this is a blatant lie

I thought it was a 'non crime hate incident'. So no crime committed. Just an attack on freedom of speech.

For clay shooting, you will have to be a member of a club that shoots clay pigeon and show use. Which means the club will have to log visits etc. Depending on the conditions added to the cert, you may only be able to go clay shooting on official club shoots. Also if the ammo comes under section 1 it will mean storage in a secure cabinet, and restrictions on the number you can have at any one time. That will be for all. People storing 10,000 will not be happening.

Fixed it

AI is your friend here. Tell it what you want and it will appear.

Bit like Iraq and Afghanistan. How dare we paint them as the bad guys, they were the ones invaded. Those in glass houses. Now I don't pretend to know the ins and outs, and I'm not condoning Russia's actions. I don't know.enough and I am almost certain that Trump knows things we do not. Just putting some perspective on our hypocrisy.

No problem. If my PCC replies, I will forward that as well.

If the markings on the evidence marker are 1cm lines, it is about the right size for 22lr

Finally got a reply from my MP and she seems to bang on about BASC, even though I never mentioned them once in my email. Her reply and my email are below. I have passed this on to politics@basc.org.uk Dear Thank you for contacting me about the changes to firearms licensing fees. I understand that the British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) has raised concerns about the increase in fees. However, it is important to note that firearms licensing fees were last updated ten years ago. Since then, they have been significantly lower than the actual cost of providing the service. I believe a more effective and efficient firearms licensing system is long overdue. This increase in fees will help make the system more efficient and effective, and ensure that police forces can fully cover the costs of processing firearm license applications. I would like to reassure you that this decision was not taken lightly. It follows an impact assessment which reviewed a wide range of evidence, looking at the number of businesses, individuals and police in England, Scotland and Wales that would be affected by updating fees for firearm or shotgun licences. The Home Office also held discussions on the fee increase with several key organisations at the Firearms Fees Working Group in 2022 and 2023. I understand the Policing Minister also met with BASC in January this year. I understand there have been concerns raised about delays in firearms licensing by organisations like BASC, as these delays can often last for several months or years. I am therefore glad the Government has confirmed that this rise in fees will support applicants to receive a more professional service, and to help put stronger safeguards in place to protect the public from the misuse of licensed firearms. The Government has also provided reassurance that it has had contact with Police and Crime Commissioners and Chief Constables, clarifying that the income from increased fees must be used to support improvements in the service provided by their firearms licensing teams. Please be assured that I will continue to support efforts to ensure that the framework for firearms licensing controls is under constant review. Thank you once again for sharing your thoughts with me about this issue. Yours sincerely Lauren Edwards MP Rochester and Strood From: Sent: 23 January 2025 06:41 To: EDWARDS, lauren.edwards.mp@parliament.uk Subject: Concerns Regarding Proposed Firearms Licensing Fees Increases Dear Lauren Edwards MP I am writing to you as one of your constituents to express my concerns regarding the proposed increases to firearms licensing fees and the significant impact this could have on the countryside, rural communities, and law-abiding certificate holders like myself. There are two key points I would like to raise regarding this proposal: Unfounded Justification for the Fee Increase The government has suggested that the additional funds raised from these increased fees will support improvements in firearms licensing departments. However, this claim is unfounded, as there are no mechanisms in place to ensure this happens. Responsibility for the allocation of funds lies with the Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) and Chief Constables of each force, and there is no assurance that this additional revenue will actually be directed towards improving the licensing process. This raises serious concerns about whether the money will instead be diverted elsewhere, failing to address the real issues within the system. Lack of Consultation and Transparency The announcement of these fee increases has been made without proper consultation with stakeholders and shows a complete lack of transparency. This undermines trust in the process and fails to consider the impact on rural voters and communities, where shooting is not only a sport but also an essential part of countryside management, conservation, and the rural economy. As certificate holders, we are now facing full cost recovery, effectively bearing the burden of a process that is necessitated not by us but by government and police requirements. While we understand the need for licensing to ensure safety and compliance, it is only fair to expect a timely and efficient service in return. This should include clear and enforceable deadlines for processing renewals and grants to avoid the undue stress and disruption currently experienced by many shooters. The countryside depends on a fair and functional licensing system to support the responsible use of firearms in activities ranging from pest control to conservation efforts. It is essential that any changes to licensing fees are implemented transparently, with consultation and accountability to ensure the funds are used appropriately. I urge you to raise this issue with the relevant authorities and advocate for a fairer approach that supports rural communities and ensures that certificate holders receive the service they are paying for. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response. Yours sincerely

ID are a mobile service provider, like EE, Vodafone etc.

If there is any truth in the claim that around half of the money given to Ukraine is unaccounted for, and has disappeared. Then all support should cease immediately. We were warned that Ukraine is corrupt. Maybe this is why our politicians are so willing to donate our hard earned, maybe some is finding it's way back into their personal coffers...............

Nail squarely hit on the head!

And the one who couldn't be deported, because, as a paedophile, he would be treated badly in his own country...... Says a lot about the UK

Still.waiting for a reply from my MP, it's only been 4 weeks......... I'll email the same one to my PCC, didn't think to send it to them as well.

I hope you are right, but history (especially politics) has a way of repeating itself.

Which is why we need to move to the Swiss method of government

^^^ This.