Jump to content

right or wrong,


Recommended Posts

I said exactly the same but got slated, open ticket, safe shooting practices, what wrong!!

Said as it isn't a listed calibre for Fox it's inhumane, same person puts a pitcher on them!!

 

There is nothing that says 22LR is not a suitable round for foxing. THe police guidance states that :

 

.22 Rimfires are generally considered as having insufficient muzzle energy to be used
against foxes in most circumstances. However, these could be suitable for use at short
range by experienced persons, and may be permitted in certain situations such as around
farm buildings or paddocks. It is for the operator to ensure that the quarry species are
shot at the appropriate range with the appropriate ammunition to achieve a humane kill.
Combination shotgun/rifles should have the rifled barrel in a similar calibre. Expanding

ammunition should be authorised for shooting foxes (page 106, 13.25)

 

In addition, Page 120 (note 2) states that : Foxes may be shot using .22RF but only at short range

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People have been effectively shooting foxes at close range with 22LR for decades.

If you have an open ticket and it's done with a little common sense and discretion I can't see any issue.


Edit: Just watched the video, they don't get any deader than that, I noticed the bullet passed through though, be careful of that if it's in an urban area.

Edited by Muddy Funker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only people who ever raise an issue are those that have no experience.

 

I have done this many a time with all my rimfires, the .22lr and subs is 100% capable in circumstances as shown.

 

I'm off tonight to do exactly the same on another garden fox. :yes::good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to agree with Dekers on this one! As long as the .22LR is used at "sensible" range so as to offer a quick and humane dispatch thenI can se no issue. The only thing to take into consideration is how your FAC is worded i.e. If is specifically mentions a calibre for shooting foxes with or if there is no mention of fox at all on your ticket. The BASC have stated that they would defend any of their members who were taken to court for shooting foxes with a .22LR as they class foxes as "vermin" but I don't know if they have ever been "taken to task" on that!

I would have no problem what so ever with using my .22LR with sub-sonic ammunition on a fox as long as it was within a reasonable range and offered a safe shot!

 

Just out of interest, and I have to admit that I am not sure either way in the "guidelines" posted by robbiep (Post number 6) how would anyone decide or even define who is classed as an "experienced person"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine an 'experienced person' would probably be viewed as post-renewed FAC, so over 5 yrs experience. That seems to be the guideline that the Police have for automatically opening up a FAC, if it hasn't been requested previously, and I also believe that words to that extent are in the police guidance, but I'm not going to wade through that lot again just to check.

However, it really is an absolute minefield. Nothing really concrete written down. I view 22LR and fox as a sub-50 yard combination myself. I suppose you could take foxes out to 100 yards or so with a fast 22LR, but that's for better shots than me. I'll punch paper out to that distance quite happily (and accurately) with LR, but I wouldn't be willing to do it on fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is quite a misunderstood topic and it keeps being stated (wrongly) that police will not allow .22lr to be used for shooting fox.

 

The .22lr is perfectly suited to fox control in the right circumstances. Indeed, it is the weapon of choice.

 

Generally speaking, however, the police will not accept 'fox control' as 'good reason' for having a .22lr as there are more suitable (centrefire) calibres for that purpose.

 

'Good reason' for having a .22lr could be 'rabbit control' as it is ideally suited to that purpose. It can then also be used against fox in the right circumstances. If possible have the 'any lawful quarry' statement on your licence as that removes any legal ambiguity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

surely as in the film a .22 at close range, shooting into the ground couldn't be safer. I have a .22 round that breaks into 3 pieces on impact, this would make a chest shot feasible as each piece creates its own wound channel. Good Luck.

 

The CCI segmenting breaks into thee small frontal sections and retains its heavy base. It does not carry any less ricochet potential and it seems this claim was only made in the UK. It kills very well but I am not sure it will kill fox any better because this is all about perfect placement with the .22

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd imagine an 'experienced person' would probably be viewed as post-renewed FAC, so over 5 yrs experience. That seems to be the guideline that the Police have for automatically opening up a FAC, if it hasn't been requested previously, and I also believe that words to that extent are in the police guidance, but I'm not going to wade through that lot again just to check.

However, it really is an absolute minefield. Nothing really concrete written down. I view 22LR and fox as a sub-50 yard combination myself. I suppose you could take foxes out to 100 yards or so with a fast 22LR, but that's for better shots than me. I'll punch paper out to that distance quite happily (and accurately) with LR, but I wouldn't be willing to do it on fox.

 

Actually and interestingly there is little difference in retained energy at 100 yards between subs and HV, its at short range were most of the extra whack is held by the HV

As its close range I use a silenced .410 shotgun (magnum) as I'm worried about ricochet from the .22LR in my garden

 

That must be at seriously close range?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Actually and interestingly there is little difference in retained energy at 100 yards between subs and HV, its at short range were most of the extra whack is held by the HV

 

Sorry, I wasn't making any point regarding retained energy on 22LR at 100 yards. I was only saying that with 22LR, environmental factors have too great an effect for me to be happy using it on fox at that distance. Then again, it gives the perfect reason for having a .223 !

Edited by robbiep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sorry, I wasn't making any point regarding retained energy on 22LR at 100 yards. I was only saying that with 22LR, environmental factors have too great an effect for me to be happy using it on fox at that distance. Then again, it gives the perfect reason for having a .223 !

 

I know of them killed at that range and further though its not for me either, just thought its an interesting fact about HV. Better guns for foxing once you get out of the garden, .22 although a legend for the weird and large things it has killed tends to do it slowly if its not spot on the spot. Never been tempted but I don't need to shoot them on housing estates either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that many do not realise the potency of the .22 rim fire . It is a very deadly round on soft skinned mammals up to 100 yards . Both the HV and the hollow point will kill old Reynard dead at ranges up to 100 yards . Over the years I have killed many a fox with the .22 rim fire . At 100 yards both rounds will penetrate a 1 inch thick piece of laminate board that I pin my targets on . A few years ago in Scotland a walker was accidentally shot in the head by a .22 rimfire and killed at a range of 700 yards . Don't under estimate the .22 rimfire it is a very deadly round and can be deadly at ranges of one kilometre .

 

Harnser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...