Jump to content

SCOTLAND


four-wheel-drive
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Its all going to end in tears...One of the first things that happens is a increase in interest rates and Mortgage rates as Scotland's commerce struggles to build its own currency and fiscal policy. The lenders wont be able to ply their trade in the EU because Scotland wont be a member of it, and the British based lenders are going to be very belligerent and unhelpful.

 

Give it 10 or 20 years after the novelty has worn off and the Scots will be banging on the doors of Westminster asking to come back in.

 

If I were the Scots keen on independence I would have a good long think about what its going to mean to your Employment, income and financial security before you blindly follow Salmond down the Tweed without a paddle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you say but on the above point I don't think Wesminster has helped by keeping the Mccrone report secret from the Scottish public. It certainly breeds distrust of the establishment.....

 

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCrone_report

 

Oh I am with you on that, I am no apologist for Westminster and I fully expect and believe that there is still a lot of information with held from all of us, not just the Scottish, that would further breed distrust and dissent. I also expect that is common to every developed nation in the world.

 

Power is always tainted with dishonesty and abuse which makes it so ironic that the grass roots of the yes campaign think that somehow Scotland will be immune to that in the brave new world of secession from the UK, because we are Scottish we won't have abuse of parliamentary privilege.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scotland will also have no representation at westminster and no Scottish Minister and will 'negotiate' with England. No-one will be Scotlands friend after this. RBS have confirmed they will be moving to London - only if they change their name and anti Scottish feeling will be an impediment to be overcome at a difficult time. The grass is always greener but it may simply be scorched earth. I still hope for the retention of the union but has anyone noticed the English flags going up ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scotland will also have no representation at westminster and no Scottish Minister and will 'negotiate' with England. No-one will be Scotlands friend after this. RBS have confirmed they will be moving to London - only if they change their name and anti Scottish feeling will be an impediment to be overcome at a difficult time. The grass is always greener but it may simply be scorched earth. I still hope for the retention of the union but has anyone noticed the English flags going up ?

 

Neither they should have representation in Westminster when it is a separate country, after the date of independence, however during the period of negotiation Scotland will still be part of the union so will have the same representation as they do now, albeit with very little favour I would agree,

 

The suggested date of independence is 24 March 2016, at least according to Kim Jong Eck, which is 309 years to the date of the Act of Union. Pleased to see he picked that date based on sound reasons and nothing to do with a bit of misplaced symbolism and sentiment !!!!

 

Some interesting issues comes out of this though, all assuming a yes vote of course;

 

Should the Scottish people still be allowed to vote in the 2015 general election?

If there continues to be Scottish MP's in Westminster should they be allowed to vote on non Scottish issues until the day they get turfed out?

If the Scottish vote gave a small minority to Labour, or caused a hung parliament, but removal of those MP's allowed a Conservative majority, or largest single share of the vote what would/should happen?

Should the Scottish MP's be counted towards a parliamentary majority?

 

As much as I don't want to see a Yes vote it will be fascinating to watch how everything unfolds.

Edited by grrclark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nial - there are a chunk of people who believe that the oil is "Scottish". It is very misleading, as it is not. Some of the "Scottish oil" area of the North Sea falls into "English" waters.

 

As above Gordon the majority is in Scottish waters.

 

More worryingly there are a chunk of people who think the oil money is going to provide a land of milk and honey, rather than just go towards trying to balance the books.

 

I would laugh my ******** off if Shetland and Ornkney seceded from Scotland to re-joing the rUK on a yes vote (apart from the fact we'd be in the thick of it).

 

Nial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nial - interesting scenario. Personally, I think that an independent Scotland would harm the rest of the UK and Scotland. However, I have no vote and nothing that is written on this or any other forum will affect the actual vote.

 

The issue is very complicated, but many seek to make it a simple one, missing out any facts or doubts which don't suit their purpose.

 

People appear to have made up their minds with their heart rather than their head, but that is their right.

 

I agree with others, that it will be interesting to see exactly what would happen if the yes vote succeeds. I have a fair number of Scottish friends and would not like to see them suffer, if Scotland goes down the pan. Sadly I suspect it will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone think of any country that has gained independence.that fifty or one hundred years later reverts back to a pre independence situation?If Scotland votes for independence they will never return to the U.K.

hurray for that, at least the currency issue is resolved

 

3603138003_zps506014cb.jpg

Edited by kdubya
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Crimea was given by khrushchev to the Ukraine when they were all part of the USSR, so really no change for it's people at the time.

As part of the collapse of the USSR the Ukraine including Crimea seceded or gained independence from Russia.

 

The people of the Crimea have decided that they want to be part of Russia and have since done so, albeit in a slightly different context.

 

Not withstanding any of that, it has absolutely no relevance to the Scottish independence debate other than perhaps a note of academic interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My fear is that it is going to be very close and messy. If as Niall touches on what if clearly defined regions have a majority saying No. What of voting fraud, it's happened in the past in UK elections in the form of postal ballot rigging and has been swept under the proverbial carpet. Who's riding shotgun on the fairness or not of this result?

Edited by TriBsa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The suggested date of independence is 24 March 2016, at least according to Kim Jong Eck, which is 309 years to the date of the Act of Union. Pleased to see he picked that date based on sound reasons and nothing to do with a bit of misplaced symbolism and sentiment !!!!

 

If there is a yes vote, I would not be surprised if the place falls apart before then. There will be massive uncertainty in business, and some businesses which are obligated to be in the UK (defence contractors for instance), and there may well be a sudden halt in any investment. All of a sudden Ned is out of a job, and didn't think it would happen to him. Could well be pitchforks in the street scenarios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...