pavman Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 You have been given a chance to shoot bunnies by farmer, you don’t have a FAC and noise is a problem, you have an old .22 spring action air rifle. what is the opinion of our air gunners as to the pros and cons of .177 and .22 at 12 ftlbs, do any of you take many bunnies with either if so what cal works best in your opinion. Thanks pavman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naddan28 Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 You have been given a chance to shoot bunnies by farmer, you don’t have a FAC and noise is a problem, you have an old .22 spring action air rifle. what is the opinion of our air gunners as to the pros and cons of .177 and .22 at 12 ftlbs, do any of you take many bunnies with either if so what cal works best in your opinion. Thanks pavman Personally, if I was starting again with the knoweldge I have now I would choose a .177 PCP. .177 is a lot more flatter so makes field shooting imo easier as its more forgiving if you incorectly judge the distance. Althou if you are going to buy an air rifle, I would consider going FAC and getting a FAC one, they are cheaper 2nd hand and more power will be ideal for shooting rabbits esp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyjaimz Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 You have been given a chance to shoot bunnies by farmer, you don’t have a FAC and noise is a problem, you have an old .22 spring action air rifle. what is the opinion of our air gunners as to the pros and cons of .177 and .22 at 12 ftlbs, do any of you take many bunnies with either if so what cal works best in your opinion. Thanks pavman I've been using my .177 S200 for the past couple of months and been raking the bunnies in. I have a .22 also but its waiting for a decent scope. The .177 also has a flatter trajectory than a .22 making it more forgiving of range estimating mistakes = easier to place a pellet accurately. Dont get me wrong, my Falcon .22 knocks a rabbit on its *** well and truly (but you have to know your distances) But as I say, the S200 has been dropping them just as easily recently, it's all about pellet placement at the end of the day IMO. You'll probably get someone along telling you to check previous threads now as this is older than the Big Bang / Evolution debate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitebridges Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 IMHO .177 is an easy winner at 12ft lb Pavman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavman Posted April 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 IMHO .177 is an easy winner at 12ft lb Pavman. Are we talking speed and penetration? Lets not expect a reply from NTTF as he knows nothing about either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axe Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Chestnut old not this again! I would advise that the old springer in .22 would good enough if properly serviced. If one wanted to take it onboard seriously I would suggest a PCP and a possible upgrade into FAC. Either way, it would always be .22 as this ones fingers are to big to be fumbling a .177 pellet. Actually there are other very good reasons too. If you upgrade to PCP, you'll get more shots per fill in .22 and the heavier grain pellet is more stable in the elements. It also transfers all of its energy to the target. Whereas .177 pellets are known to continue through and therefore not deliver all the energy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naddan28 Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 IMHO .177 is an easy winner at 12ft lb Pavman. Are we talking speed and penetration? Lets not expect a reply from NTTF as he knows nothing about either Due to the speed .177 pellets fly flatter further. Imagine luanching a tennis ball then shot put, which travels further & flatter, the tennis ball its lighter and has more speed. Due to the fact it is lighter and therefore travelling faster it is more likely to penetrate this is then further increased by the smaller cross sectional area as smaller points (needles, knifes etc) penetrate easier. At 12ftlbs, although i use a .22 my next gun would DEFINATELY be .177 even if it involved a trade in. However, should I go FAC then .22 (due to the extra power the fac allows). But as I said earlier pav you actually be financially and power wise better off going down the FAC route. If you alreaady own a guncabinet for your SG's then just apply for a FAC air rifle and you will find one cheaper 2nd hand than the equivilant 12ftlb model. So then you can tell the Mrs you saved money & got a better gun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosspot Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 .177 as anything else would be madness i'm sure pav that SNAKEBITE has got an opinion on the subject that he probably hasn't expressed in all of 24 hours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pin Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 The answer, just to stir it up again, isn't .177 or .22 - its .20. Best compromise of flat shooting and what people incorrectly call "stopping power" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNAKEBITE Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 I have an opinion on this, thank you for asking, and I'm sure you are not surprised to hear that I have! It goes along the lines of............. Pavman, you deserve a right battering for bringing this up again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunkield Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 You have been given a chance to shoot bunnies by farmer, you don’t have a FAC and noise is a problem, you have an old .22 spring action air rifle. what is the opinion of our air gunners as to the pros and cons of .177 and .22 at 12 ftlbs, do any of you take many bunnies with either if so what cal works best in your opinion. Thanks pavman .22 rimfire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNAKEBITE Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Would that be the .22 rimfire that they don't have because they have no FAC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunkield Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Would that be the .22 rimfire that they don't have because they have no FAC? What better excuse to get one, and then get a grown ups gun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavman Posted April 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 so once again it looks like we have a divided opinion cheers lads Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunkield Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Didn't someone once say? .177 for feathers .22 for fur I don't know anything about airguns, but applying logic, it but if are close up a .22 will give them more of a whack, and if they are far off a .177 will be more forgiving in terms of tradjectory?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naddan28 Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Yep stuart they did but the problem with only having 12ftlbs you want to maximise your potential range! Placement is key so really does calibre matter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_k Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 well take a hard look at it the larger pellets of the .22 due to having a lagre surface area will hit harder, but due to them being bigger they will not fly as far due to a larger air resistance, and also not penetrate as deep. the 177 will penetrate deeper and fly futher, giving a hit as hard as the .22 at the longer range as the barrel in the 177 is smaller the same 12ft/lb of preasure are concentreate on small area, and therefore the overall preasure will be released quicker. take it as a garden hose, put your finger over hald the hole and the preasure is greater, but still coming from the tap at the same rate i would have 177 myself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackthorn Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 177 every time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNAKEBITE Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 177 every time That's what all the hairdressers say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatingisbest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 .177 or .22 Neither, .25 is the way forward I use .22 but dont really mind about the calibre, as long as im very accurate with the gun, it doesnt make a lot of difference, I only use .22 because thats what calibre the gun i bought was Airgunning is all about accuracy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njc110381 Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 .177 is better at 12ft-lbs in my opinion. I've had both, and shooting accurately is the key to success. .177 is easier to be accurate with and with the right pellet will not over penetrate. I'd never buy a .22 now unless it was FAC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
08shooter Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 22 all the way i have both fac and non fac and would nt go to 177 for any money,my answer and reason for that is know your gun,know your trajectory and finally spend time shooting them so you can know the first two.in my opinion 177 is for those guys who cant get their heads round pellet drop and like the flatter flying pellet,remember the old saying PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codling99 Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackthorn Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 22 all the way i have both fac and non fac and would nt go to 177 for any money,my answer and reason for that is know your gun,know your trajectory and finally spend time shooting them so you can know the first two.in my opinion 177 is for those guys who cant get their heads round pellet drop and like the flatter flying pellet,remember the old saying PRACTICE MAKES PERFECT shot since i was very young always shot with a 22 no problems with the 22 hit most i was shooting at as said learn trajectories 177 greater killing distance when you have no fac and no hope of getting one to me 177 gave me that edge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beartrap Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 Have shot with both over 30 + years also spring and PCP - shot two bunnies half an hour ago - one with Falcon Light Hunter .177 - 12 lb ft ( went straight through heart lung - sometimes a problem with .177 - it don't know it's dead 'til itb gets to its hole!) - the other with BSA Ultra in .22 - bowled it over well - pellet stayed in - both at around 45+yds - both are cleaned and filleted, wrapped in bacon ready to cook in cider tomorrow - get a decent scope!!! you won't hit much if ya can't see it! good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.