fortune Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 They either did or didn't and if they've got video footage of these incidents how has this decision been reached? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40830133 I bet that the fifth man who had admitted misconduct in a public office wishes that he had kept quiet and denied any wrongdoing. It was a training exercise gov! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panoma1 Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 Good example of what? Stupidity, fallibility or not being professional....or all three? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbob Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 It doesnt matter if they did or they didnt the public trust in the police takes another hit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVB Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 It's quite simple imo. They weren't filming, the man who admitted the offence was. If you were driving your car would you be responsible for what your passenger filmed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me matt Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 Probably not a good example for an officer of the law- but you have to admit, its as funny as **** to happen upon cavorting couples 😄 I remember when our kids were little and we took them for a walk along burnham marshes..... couple of hippies banging like wild animals in the long grass haha kids hadn't a clue, quite lucky as the unwashed couple carried on as we passed by. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 Matt, it was all planned, premeditated. The camera operator knew the couple filmed having sex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortune Posted August 4, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 (edited) Perhaps the bloke being filmed did an impersonation of the helicopter. Edited August 4, 2017 by fortune Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me matt Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 Matt, it was all planned, premeditated. The camera operator knew the couple filmed having sex. Proper kinky coppers ☺ brilliant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker570 Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 Always been one or two rogues in the job but they have high tech kit to play with these days and of course employment law means tens of thousands of pounds wasted on enquiries whereas in my day back in the 60s they would have been at HQ with their uniforms wrapped in brown paper the next day ...goodbye & good riddance. Had a pal, who had the makings of a very good copper, fall asleep on the bus stop bench on nights. Found by the unit sergeant and was out of the job in 48hrs. Same had one on my unit swapped some good mini tyres in the found/stolen property store for his own. I had that day just had a new set put on my car and was dragged in for questioning fortunately had the receipt. He was gone next morning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del.gue Posted August 4, 2017 Report Share Posted August 4, 2017 Re the original OP. As an ex cop it doesnt look good and there are door knobs in the job, i worked with a few!...but we were not party to the full facts only what was reported. The jury decided on the evidence given and gave a decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.