The Salisbury Poison Gas Incident II

[12gauge82]

13 minutes ago, Hamster said:

Yes.

There's no more proof for it than 1.

[Mungler]

And there we have it.

[Hamster]

40 minutes ago, 12gauge82 said:

There's no more proof for it than 1.

Nonsense, there is tons of proof, you're just refusing to look. 

 

1 hour ago, Mungler said:

Beautifully done

Beautifully avoided, there's a difference. 

[Hamster]

Physicist Steven Jones. 

[henry d]

Excellent, a 9/11 tangent.

Someone had to fly a plane into the towers and just prior to that put charges in the towers without anyone knowing what was going on, and they made an error by letting it fall in its own footprint, just so the conspiracy had credibility? Deffo FE territory.

[AVB]

48 minutes ago, Hamster said:

Physicist Steven Jones. 

And there are lots of posts that debunk his views. Why is he believable? 

[Rewulf]

Although this is way off topic now, its relevant in a way, Ill explain.

For you to give weight to any conspiracy theory, you have to have a healthy distrust in your governments, and others governments ability to tell the truth.
If you believe the people we elected to govern us ALWAYS tell the truth, then stop reading this right now, and get on with your life.

Once we have established that we cant actually trust them, then its a matter of how FAR we cant trust them.
Would they murder their own subjects to further their ends ?
Would they manipulate the truth to cause a given event or events ?
Without prejudice, Im sure even the most sceptical can think of instances where both these events have happened.

Once you get this straight in your mind, you can begin to look at world events from a different angle.

This video 'debunks' the theory that WTC7  was demolished.

If you know much about construction, you will know that WT7, 1 and 2 were steel framed 'skyscrapers' 
Basically an extremely strong core of high grade steel ,that is then clad in concrete, more steel and glass.
But the integrity of the building is in the steel frame, the lower parts holding the entire weight of the upper floors ect.

Prior to 9/11 no steel frame building in history had ever come down due to a fire, 17 years ago today, 3 did (allegedly)
In fact, its that difficult to demolish a steel framer, it can take weeks of professional work to rig it .

Now, you can do as much research as you like as to how or why WTC7 came down the way it did, and come to your own conclusions, yes, part of the outer shell was damaged, yes, there was some small fires on the upper floors.
But that building fell, like there was no steel inside it.
So, if WTC 7 was rigged for demolition, and its an absolute impossibility that it was done on the day, then that means they knew what was going to happen that day, and had planned accordingly.
If the collapse of WTC 1 and 2 does then not look equally suspicious, then again stop reading.

Once the doubt sets in, and the subsequent military backlash from the west against all targets of opportunity doesnt seem a little convenient, you need to examine what else 'happens' to enable a certain response.
Fake chemical attacks in Syria blamed on a government the west has vowed to 'remove' so that a billion quids worth of ordnance can be thrown at an empty factory.
The west and Israel training and arming Islamic extremists to overthrow M.E. governments, causing backlash terrorist attacks in Europe and the US, causing a humanitarian disaster that will affect us for generations.

Its not a leap of faith as such to try and see it from a different perspective, more a small step.

Thats why Im struggling to see why its such a far out thing to think that our government, in collusion with other states, couldnt  stage a fake attack on an ex Russian spy, so they could use it for economic and political leverage?

Call me what you like, a loon, fool , Ive thought it through and ,although I might not know what really happened, Im 99.99% positive its not the ever changing story we are being fed.

Interesting fact:
The day the Skripals were poisoned, there appears to be some confusion to their movements on the day.
No one seems to have had the sense to have the Skripals own version published for some reason, so the confusion continues..
However, just in case they cant remember .. Your phone, whether it be iphone or android has an interesting feature.
It tracks your movements via GPS ,and a log can be bought up of previous days, weeks.
Only problem is , both Skripals switched their GPS functions off on their phones that day, so no logs.
 
In android -Settings - Google services - location - google location history- manage timeline - select calendar (at the top) and pick a date- voila ! a map , and location/times.

First they ignore you.
Then they laugh at you...