Jump to content

Pelosis and the Guardian


Walker570
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Guardian news paper has printed a piece about this woman indicating she has stole the march on The Donald, nothing is further from the truth like much printed in The Guardian.

Pelosis has bitten off more than she can chew and has dragged the Democrats in the USA down to about the same level as the Corbyn bunch here in the UK but Heh!! why print the truth.

There is little doubt in the USA that this pathetic woman has guaranteed The Donald as second term much the same as Corbyn and his acolytes did here in the UK.

Democrats are even jumping off the sinking ship and joining the Republicans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Walker570 said:

The Guardian news paper has printed a piece about this woman indicating she has stole the march on The Donald, nothing is further from the truth like much printed in The Guardian.

Pelosis has bitten off more than she can chew and has dragged the Democrats in the USA down to about the same level as the Corbyn bunch here in the UK but Heh!! why print the truth.

There is little doubt in the USA that this pathetic woman has guaranteed The Donald as second term much the same as Corbyn and his acolytes did here in the UK.

Democrats are even jumping off the sinking ship and joining the Republicans.

All good news then :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Scully said:

There is little more despicable than those who claim they know better than the electorate, attempting to bring down another part of the establishment because they claim the electorate got it wrong. 

Yep. Pathological hate based ideology does no one any good, least of all the hater; and it certainly makes you unelectable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmn. It's possible for both sides to be wrong, but for one side to be more wrong than the other.

The question is whether Trump did or didn't use his presidential office to change US foreign policy for the purpose of blackmailing a foreign power into providing him with dirt on a domestic political rival. If he didn't, it's a witch hunt. If he did, then he shouldn't be president.

Perhaps it might be wiser to see what gets revealed before passing judgement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Retsdon said:

Hmmn. It's possible for both sides to be wrong, but for one side to be more wrong than the other.

The question is whether Trump did or didn't use his presidential office to change US foreign policy for the purpose of blackmailing a foreign power into providing him with dirt on a domestic political rival. If he didn't, it's a witch hunt. If he did, then he shouldn't be president.

Perhaps it might be wiser to see what gets revealed before passing judgement.

If he was going to blackmail a country's leader, he wouldn't do it on a phone call he knew was being listened to by quite a few people🙄   If you saw the House of Representatives "Trial", then you would have seen a futile farce that in anyone's book added up to a 'witch hunt'………….   The Democrats revealed everything they had, and continued to impeach on what they had….so THEY already passed judgement🥴  Regardless what you think of Trump, the whole impeachment process has been a joke!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...