Harnser Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 A man who hits what he is shooting at and nothing else . Harnser . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyjaimz Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Sounds more like an accurate shooter to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutley Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Thats ******** all us shot gun Boys then..... About 8 bits of shot in the pigeon and at 32gms god knows where the other 350 odd bits went Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurcherboy Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Thats ******** all us shot gun Boys then.....About 8 bits of shot in the pigeon and at 32gms god knows where the other 350 odd bits went :( LB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignoel Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Hmmmmmmme :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunkield Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 A shooter who has never endangered someone else surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Wild west bank robbers are safe shooters. Wokka wokka. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham M Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Just because someone is accurate enough to hit something, doesn’t mean he is safe. G.M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean k Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 A man who hits what he is shooting at and nothing else . Harnser . Weird post has this got any meaning or point ?? Dean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mungler Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Dunno, posted at 10.23 p.m. Could have done a couple of bottles of red and got the Dylan records out..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harnser Posted February 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 A man who hits what he is shooting at and nothing else . Harnser . Weird post has this got any meaning or point ?? Dean You seem to be missing the the point on this one . Guns do not become dangerous untill the human element is introduced .once the human element is introduced guns can become deadly weapons .There fore if you have a gun of any sort in your hands and only hit what you are aiming at ,or indeed miss what you are aiming at without hitting anything else you can then be conciderd a safe shot . This advice was from government trained instructors on all of the intensive pistol and rifle shooting courses that i attend a few years ago . I thought it worth sharing on the forum . Harnser . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markio Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Don't run with Scissors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdfish Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Never putting jam in a toaster. Hijacking the thread somewhat I was reading about Churchill in Canada on Sunday and how it is the polar bear capital of the world. There has only been one death in the past thirty years however which when you consider that 1200 polar bears gather there annually it is not too bad. The death however could have been prevented if the individual involved was not walking down the street with several pounds of meat in his pockets. Thats not safe. Really quite dangerous. I will bet the government trained instructors never warned you about that, did they! JDF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flash Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 jim thats one of the most random posts ive read in a while Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Does that mean Michael Ryan and Thomas Hamilton were safe shots? They hit what they were aiming at. What a crock of ****, since when has the government known enough about firearms to train anybody? My definition of a safe shot would be "somebody competent enough to handle a firearm in such a way as to not endanger person or property." And I did not copy and paste that from anywhere. I only shoot with people who I consider to be safe, not one that some half baked overpaid civil servant consultant considers to be safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.