andypaint Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 I heard a rumour back at the time thay she was pregnant with alfayed child and the royal establishment were having non of it. So was bumped off. I used to see Trevor rees jones the sole surviver I my local pub. And he was certainly told never to talk of that night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FalconFN Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 I heard a rumour that is was Phillip chasing her on a moped with the Queen sitting side-saddle on the back and that it was actually Dodi that was pregnant after taking illegal hormone pills given to him by Barry Chuckle. I've seen Barry 'the knife' Chuckle and when I asked him about it he pretended to look confused and denied it all - he's obviously been ordered not to talk about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beeredup Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 She was being driven by a boozer, at very high speed, she chose not to wear a seatbelt, all very avoidable and certainly no conspiracy. sad but true! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beeredup Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 as with many stories the press like to speculate and twist and turn stories to make them the most money! hence i no longer read news papers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canis Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 What have the Belgians ever done for us?? Chocolate and beer . Harnser. technically correct but wrong answer Wife beater lager and B25 browning shotguns ! , come to think of it just about anything that comes out of the FN factory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinkella Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 nobodys ever going to know one way or the other Agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 Most certainly. I take it no-one read the link I posted where the source of the info was revealed as Sgt Nightingales mate who is currently inside on firearms offences. Total fruitcake if anyone bothered to read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evo Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 i didn,t like the woman when she was young ,but i have to be honest when she started to get older i thought she was well worth one,,, or two if she stood still long enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pigeonblasterian Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 She did come across as a slapper as she got older. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sako751sg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 I heard a rumour that is was Phillip chasing her on a moped with the Queen sitting side-saddle on the back and that it was actually Dodi that was pregnant after taking illegal hormone pills given to him by Barry Chuckle. I've seen Barry 'the knife' Chuckle and when I asked him about it he pretended to look confused and denied it all - he's obviously been ordered not to talk about it. That was no rumour fella,i read it in the Sunday Sport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordieh Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 so did half of chelsea Hi All Bloody hell poor old John Terry getting blamed again Geordie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wriggler Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 She did come across as a slapper as she got older. You can't say about saint Dianna. She was an upmarket version of Jordan without all the plastic parts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 She was being driven by a boozer, at very high speed, she chose not to wear a seatbelt, all very avoidable and certainly no conspiracy. Bang on, but there are many out there that will always see a conspiracy where one does not exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 She did come across as a slapper as she got older. Based on? I am no big fan of Diana, she tried to play the press many times, but unless you know something we don't? allegedly 5 lovers over how many years? Only that scumball Hewitt has admitted anything and then only to line his own pockets- If ever there was a man how may have been an officer but not a gentleman, it was him. Pretending to be something he wasn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclemicky Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 So are we saying that when it comes to governments and the secret services that nothing dodgy goes on ? so why is it so unbelievable that when Diana upset the wrong people she had to go ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sako751sg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 So are we saying that when it comes to governments and the secret services that nothing dodgy goes on ? so why is it so unbelievable that when Diana upset the wrong people she had to go ? Of course things dodgy happen with governments and secret services.The thing is,show us the proof otherwise all we have to go on is a ****** frog,no seatbelts,high speeds and escaping the paps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbo33 Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 So are we saying that when it comes to governments and the secret services that nothing dodgy goes on ? so why is it so unbelievable that when Diana upset the wrong people she had to go ? Personally I support your doubt too She started making noises about the fear for her safety several weeks before the accident. Paul Burrel claimed publicly, he was warned after the event by the queen. Remember the "dark forces" comment? Of course things dodgy happen with governments and secret services.The thing is,show us the proof otherwise all we have to go on is a ****** frog,no seatbelts,high speeds and escaping the paps. You will never see any proof. That's how it works. We just get fed a diet. Its the only sustenance we have, so its believed. There's no doubt the car crashed and sadly, she subsequently died. However, there is no real proof for you Sako, and all of us that the story we are told is the real one either. If you choose not to keep an open mind and believe all the things you are fed, then that's a personal choice. I'm not having a go, just merely saying I don't. I am totally convinced there is an inverse that led to this tragic situation but that's my view. A public forum is not the place I would discuss it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 Whilst I accept that various agencies get involved in "national security issues", do we really think that the palace had her bumped off. Much better ways to do than a car accident. American preppers here we come. 9/11 theory... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbo33 Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 Whilst I accept that various agencies get involved in "national security issues", do we really think that the palace had her bumped off. Much better ways to do than a car accident. American preppers here we come. 9/11 theory... So how much better do you want it to be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 So how much better do you want it to be? No better as I don't accept that she was bumped off. There is so much wooliness about the story, you could knit a jumper. If you really wanted ro do a proper job, insulin in the scalp, needle mark not noticed and the insulin breaks down so not traceable ( so a GP friend tells me) It's a question of making unanswered questions fit a story. So what if she was pregnant with Dodi's child, it's not like she was with Charlie any more. I would imagine that the boys would have stayed with Charles anyway. Who would have wanted her bopped off, the other Royals, the govt of the day? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbo33 Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 (edited) No better as I don't accept that she was bumped off. There is so much wooliness about the story, you could knit a jumper. If you really wanted ro do a proper job, insulin in the scalp, needle mark not noticed and the insulin breaks down so not traceable ( so a GP friend tells me) It's a question of making unanswered questions fit a story. So what if she was pregnant with Dodi's child, it's not like she was with Charlie any more. I would imagine that the boys would have stayed with Charles anyway. Who would have wanted her bopped off, the other Royals, the govt of the day? That still might have been the case I agree the information is discredited for the prosecution, but for the defence its without question. All skilfully manipulated to achieve the belief it has. Remember Barry Mannakee?. I'm not being patronising, just do the research. Edited August 20, 2013 by turbo33 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sako751sg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 (edited) Personally I support your doubt too She started making noises about the fear for her safety several weeks before the accident. Paul Burrel claimed publicly, he was warned after the event by the queen. Remember the "dark forces" comment? You will never see any proof. That's how it works. We just get fed a diet. Its the only sustenance we have, so its believed. There's no doubt the car crashed and sadly, she subsequently died. However, there is no real proof for you Sako, and all of us that the story we are told is the real one either. If you choose not to keep an open mind and believe all the things you are fed, then that's a personal choice. I'm not having a go, just merely saying I don't. I am totally convinced there is an inverse that led to this tragic situation but that's my view. A public forum is not the place I would discuss it. Absolutely spot on fella.There will always be two camps,one believing what they are fed,and the others believing what they are being fed.Oh,so what makes us different again?We are both believing everything we are fed,except the feeders are different. Edited August 20, 2013 by sako751sg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 Burrell would say anything to make a quid and make sure people thing he is important. Dropping a bit of info that no one can confirm or deny is the best way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabbitbosher Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclemicky Posted August 20, 2013 Report Share Posted August 20, 2013 Ok how does this sound , Diana had a nice time in Paris , 9 months later her and Dodi had a baby , Dodi and his dad make sure its brought up in the Moslim faith , would that child be 3rd or 4th in line to the throne ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.