Jump to content

67mm when people want 65 mm


Recommended Posts

Birmingham Proof House, normally cites the chamber length of 65mm +2.0mm (even though a true 2.5 inch is only 63.5mm) for chamber length and 20.3mm for chamber diameter, whilst bore is 18.2mm.

 

Even if your cartridge case ends up inside the forcing cone up to almost half way (forcing cones are normally at least 12.5mm long), your are not going to endanger the gun or yourself with a plastic cartridge case that is 0.5mm to 0.75mm thick as the dimensions are not any tighter than what would occur in the true bore of the gun and your chamber/forcing cone area are heavier and thicker than the bore. You may (or may not depending on who you believe) upset the shot pattern, but other than that, little difference will be noticeable.

 

The simple way to be happy is to measure your chamber and forcing cones with a chamber or bore gauge to see what you have as I suspect some may be pleasantly surprised.

Nah! The simple way is to stick with the 65mm cased cartridges I currently use!.........They have served me well over many years! And I'm a great believer in the motto 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will find that 99% of these old 12 and smaller gauge sxs hammer guns and hammerless have a chamber lenght of 2.1/2 inch or 65mm these guns then took a rolled turnover which overall cartridge length is less that a 2.1/2 inch with crimp. When using a 67 mm the crimp enters the forcing cone and some make the gun kick heavy .The only old 12 bore guns I have come across with a longer chamber length are those which were used for live pigeon shooting over traps which used a rolled turnover 2.3/4 inch cartridge.

Feltwad

Edited by Feltwad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will find that 99% of these old 12 and smaller gauge sxs hammer guns and hammerless have a chamber lenght of 2.1/2 inch or 65mm these guns then took a rolled turnover which overall cartridge length is less that a 2.1/2 inch with crimp. When using a 67 mm the crimp enters the forcing cone and some make the gun kick heavy .The only old 12 bore guns I have come across with a longer chamber length are those which were used for live pigeon shooting over traps which used a rolled turnover 2.3/4 inch cartridge.

Feltwad

This ^^^^^^^^^^

 

Just a thought if it's ok to use 2.3/4 inch cartridges in a 2.1/2 chamber gun

 

It stands to reason that it's ok to use a 3 inch cartridge in a 2.3/4 inch chamber gun

 

Think about it !!!

 

Just my thoughts

All the best

Of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said it before here,Eley 2 1/2 inch Gand Prix etc were loaded in 2 3/4 inch cases for years ! That was when many more 2 1/2 inch guns were in regular use.

67 mm carts are fine in 2 1/2 inch guns.

I vaguely remember this although I'm not too sure about, "for years". It didn't make sense to me but I wasn't fussed as I had 2&3/4" chambers. I wonder why they don't still do it. In 12 bore the only thing they now do shorter than 67mm is the 55mm 2".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Birmingham Proof House, normally cites the chamber length of 65mm +2.0mm (even though a true 2.5 inch is only 63.5mm) for chamber length and 20.3mm for chamber diameter, whilst bore is 18.2mm.

 

Even if your cartridge case ends up inside the forcing cone up to almost half way (forcing cones are normally at least 12.5mm long), your are not going to endanger the gun or yourself with a plastic cartridge case that is 0.5mm to 0.75mm thick as the dimensions are not any tighter than what would occur in the true bore of the gun and your chamber/forcing cone area are heavier and thicker than the bore. You may (or may not depending on who you believe) upset the shot pattern, but other than that, little difference will be noticeable.

 

The simple way to be happy is to measure your chamber and forcing cones with a chamber or bore gauge to see what you have as I suspect some may be pleasantly surprised.

Not quite that simple. If we work on the figures provided, then it will be obvious that it is impossible for the opened cartridge to lay flat when, say, half way down the forcing cone. It's a simple matter of circumferences and explains why often the case mouth can appears in tatters. Yep, it may not endanger you or the gun, but odds on are it'll give you more of a kick than is necessary and exacerbate the wear on the gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This ^^^^^^^^^^

 

Just a thought if it's ok to use 2.3/4 inch cartridges in a 2.1/2 chamber gun

 

It stands to reason that it's ok to use a 3 inch cartridge in a 2.3/4 inch chamber gun

 

Think about it !!!

 

Just my thoughts

All the best

Of

 

It is unwise to use a 2.3/4 inch case in a 2/1/2inch chambered gun especially if it is a old hammer gun .

Feltwad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...