Jump to content

Death penalty. Yes or No?


Jega
 Share

Should the death penalty be restored?  

205 members have voted

  1. 1. ARE YOU IN FAVOUR OF RESTORING THE DEATH PENALTY ?

    • YES
      153
    • NO
      52


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When engand joined The do gooders in Brussels they signed a deal that this subject could never be voted on again .

 

But my vote would be hang em shoot em or inject em . There are some people that are no good in any society be it modern or third world .

 

If a crime is so heanous as to warrant the death penalty and guilt was proved by dna or other scientific evidence then what is the point of trying to reabilitate the offender . Giving them all the luxuries in life and only taking away their freedom and right to roam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I replied no, i personally don't believe in the death penatly, and i am pretty right wing. Too much room for human error in judging and jury's today! However i do believe in harsher deterents like life meaning life and no parole for reapeat sexual or voilent offenders!!

 

Though I do have a leaning towards the death penalty I have to agree GW. And dont make life easy for them either with video consoles, tvs etc. Chain gangs and hard graft for the rest of their days. ( and if they dont work, hang them :good: )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kysco - good example. Anyone remember the name of the last person to be hung in Britain? It was a woman, now beleived to be innocent.

 

 

Ruth Ellis. think she shot her boyfriend or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont do "bad stuff", I pay my taxes, I obey the law, I am not in the wrong place at the wrong time. I have nothing to fear from there being a death penalty.

 

So, the occasional one or two might slip through the net and get noosed up by mistake, I would just see it as cleansing. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont do "bad stuff", I pay my taxes, I obey the law, I am not in the wrong place at the wrong time. I have nothing to fear from there being a death penalty.

 

So, the occasional one or two might slip through the net and get noosed up by mistake, I would just see it as cleansing. :good:

 

You're a hard person, ME

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the death penalty can be shown to be a deterrant (and I've seen graphs that would imply

that it is big time) then logically and morally it should be re-introduced.

 

 

If the death penalty saves 10 innocent lives a year but costs 0.5 wrong convictions a year what's

the right thing to do?

 

 

 

Nial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a hard person, ME

 

 

I prefer "realistic".

 

If people spend their time brawling outside pubs, beating up women, taking drugs, stealing cars, hanging around on street corners, signing on whilst working, raping, killing, avoiding taxes, drink driving, etc etc then that's their choice. I DON'T so I have nothing to fear from the law or mis-carriages of justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terminate them :) , how many of our hard earned pennies have paid for the rippers upkeep?

 

 

Exactly, you would only have to do a few weeks of it and the crims would start thinking twice and the really stupid ones wouldnt have to as they would be history. :good:

 

Add in a bit of birching for the lesser crimes and the crime rates would fall over night :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer "realistic".

 

If people spend their time brawling outside pubs, beating up women, taking drugs, stealing cars, hanging around on street corners, signing on whilst working, raping, killing, avoiding taxes, drink driving, etc etc then that's their choice. I DON'T so I have nothing to fear from the law or mis-carriages of justice.

 

Now that's what I call an accurate overview of modern Britain! Are you a journalist? :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the death penalty can be shown to be a deterrant (and I've seen graphs that would imply

that it is big time) then logically and morally it should be re-introduced.

 

 

If the death penalty saves 10 innocent lives a year but costs 0.5 wrong convictions a year what's

the right thing to do?

 

 

 

Nial.

 

Do you know.... it was a similar argument the anti-gun lobby used to force the hand gun ban on us in the 90s. The argument was that, if removing guns from private ownership saves one life then taking away the legitamate sport of 60,000 law abiding citizens is a worthwhile scrifice for them to take. It is flawed logic, maybe we should ban cars, they are responsible for many many deaths, or golf... there were a couple of deaths last year where people had been hit by a golf ball.... Wrong convictions should never result in the ultimate penalty, ever! No number of wrong convictions is acceptable if that wrong conviction ends up in death

Edited by Vipa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, you would only have to do a few weeks of it and the crims would start thinking twice and the really stupid ones wouldnt have to as they would be history. :good:

 

Add in a bit of birching for the lesser crimes and the crime rates would fall over night :)

 

So why then does it not work in the USA where plenty of states are quite happy to pass and carry out the death sentence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont do "bad stuff", I pay my taxes, I obey the law, I am not in the wrong place at the wrong time. I have nothing to fear from there being a death penalty.

 

So, the occasional one or two might slip through the net and get noosed up by mistake, I would just see it as cleansing. :good:

 

But none of that would necesarily mean you wouldn't be mistakenly accused of something! Where is 'the wrong place' and when is 'the wrong time?' You don't have to be a bad person to be accused of doing bad things!

 

If anyone is unsure about the death penalty watch The Green Mile.... I know it's hollywood but it will really make you think long and hard about killing people based on 'evidence.' Remember also that humans are a very arrogant race, we are adamant that DNA evidence is infallable because we think we know it all yet there are scientists coming out of the woodwork who would dispute that just as there is now evidence to suggest that 2 people can have identical fingerprints, highly unlikely yes but possible all the same.

Edited by Vipa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But none of that would necesarily mean you wouldn't be mistakenly accused of something! Where is 'the wrong place' and when is 'the wrong time?' You don't have to be a bad person to be accused of doing bad things!

 

 

I would be prepared to take the risk. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is flawed logic,

 

Then explain why it's flawed with reasoning.

 

 

Wrong convictions should never result in the ultimate penalty, ever!

 

 

Why not.

 

Do you condemn 100 innocent people to death every year because you're afraid of hanging 1 innocent one

every other year?

 

That's 100 innocent deaths per year on your hands.

 

 

Nial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...