libs Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Fatties pay taxes on the food the buy/eat to get fat so that throws your theory out ... Not my theory.. See above posts. And like I said with the average BMI on this forum I would not support that theory! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz2202 Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Be nice to have my moobs removed free of charge. And they are reall ones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gixer1 Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Not my theory.. See above posts. And like I said with the average BMI on this forum I would not support that theory! someone's going to sit on you!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smig4373 Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 (edited) Thats ok then....let the women die then and see how much it costs the country in the long run in legal action.... as for the fat unfit 1000's of sunday league **** ed footballers....they'll be ok.. Edited January 6, 2012 by smig4373 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogz25 Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Hey I come off my motobike broke had real bad pain couldnt breath properly 1 week later went to docs I had 3 broken ribs and a swollen right breast. Doc said pleanty of rest and swelling on reaat will go down. 1 year later breast still the same, refered to glos specialist blood tests all ok, said I need surgery took photos and waited 3 months and glos hospital nhs said they wont pay for surgery, so I an left with a bit boob, so no those women choose to have implants so why should they get them out fixed free of charge when I cant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browning GTS Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 Not all implants are done for vanity, someone very close to me has had breast cancer 3 times, and had reconstruction done. She was told by her surgeon he did not use imported ones 2 years ago because of these risks. I know they still do not have to have this done but it gives a lot of confidence back after a very harrowing illness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poontang Posted January 6, 2012 Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 The NHS was created out of the ideal that good healthcare should be available to all, regardless of wealth. When it was launched by the then minister of health, Aneurin Bevan, on July 5 1948, it was based on three core principles: * that it meet the needs of everyone * that it be free at the point of delivery * that it be based on clinical need, not ability to pay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ordnance Posted January 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 6, 2012 The NHS was created out of the ideal that good healthcare should be available to all, regardless of wealth. When it was launched by the then minister of health, Aneurin Bevan, on July 5 1948, it was based on three core principles: * that it meet the needs of everyone * that it be free at the point of delivery * that it be based on clinical need, not ability to pay Women with normal breasts have no clinical need for implants. For their own vanity they want bigger tits, if they pay for it and it goes wrong why should the NHS pay for it. The money will have to come form somewhere probably at the expense of other patients on waiting lists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poontang Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Women with normal breasts have no clinical need for implants. For their own vanity they want bigger tits, if they pay for it and it goes wrong why should the NHS pay for it. The money will have to come form somewhere probably at the expense of other patients on waiting lists. Indeed, but if the implants they've had turn out to be a health risk then there is a clinical need to have them removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ack-ack Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 I think they should be taken out free of charge Then replaced with bigger ones. YIPEE.... Outstanding Laugh of the night! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeds chimp Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Indeed, but if the implants they've had turn out to be a health risk then there is a clinical need to have them removed. I partly agree BUT...why should we the taxpayer pick up the tab for clinics trying to make a quick ££ but using the imported "boob"?? As said I have used the NHS from age 5 when I had perthes disease to my jaw broken to my now detacted retina....plus many other stitches etc due to rugby and work... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diceman Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 (edited) Serious answer: if they are faulty then whoever put them in, for whatever reason, should be responsible for taking them out. Costs incurred should be reclaimed from the manufacturer's insurance providers. I believe the manufacturers themselves have gone bust, if you will pardon the pun. And whilst we are on the subject of puns I cannot be the only person to have noted that the trade body for these surgeons is called he British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons...BAAPS. Less serious answer: having had a go on both, I can confirm that a real little pair beats a fake big pair, hands down, any day of the week. Edited January 7, 2012 by Diceman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeds chimp Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Serious answer: if they are faulty then whoever put them in, for whatever reason, should be responsible for taking them out. Costs incurred should be reclaimed from the manufacturer's insurance providers. I believe the manufacturers themselves have gone bust, if you will pardon the pun. And whilst we are on the subject of puns I cannot be the only person to have noted that the trade body for these surgeons is called he British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons...BAAPS. Less serious answer: having had a go on both, I can confirm that a real little pair beats a fake big pair, hands down, any day of the week. real *** fake tits who cares...they all taste the same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poontang Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 I partly agree BUT...why should we the taxpayer pick up the tab for clinics trying to make a quick ££ but using the imported "boob"?? I would hazard a guess that most women who have cosmetic surgery are tax payers too? If not, I bet their wealthy husbands are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Of course. Its a medical issue regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krugerandsmith Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 Serious answer: if they are faulty then whoever put them in, for whatever reason, should be responsible for taking them out. Costs incurred should be reclaimed from the manufacturer's insurance providers. I believe the manufacturers themselves have gone bust, if you will pardon the pun. And whilst we are on the subject of puns I cannot be the only person to have noted that the trade body for these surgeons is called he British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons...BAAPS. Less serious answer: having had a go on both, I can confirm that a real little pair beats a fake big pair, hands down, any day of the week. Diceman. Glad you got that off your chest ....Agree absolutely ...Any lady who has this operation carried out purely out of vanity also need their heads testing ....personally I think any more than a mouthfull is a waste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Elvis Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 I like the smaller turned up chapel hat pegs meself....I dated a couple of girls that had Implants, totally unatural feel....but fun.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 It puts a new meaning on the term get your tits out. Seriously though no woman should suffer pain through these implants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_b_wales Posted January 7, 2012 Report Share Posted January 7, 2012 The French firm that made these sub standard implants are called P.I.P. It could have been worse though, as the company could have been called Teflon Implant Technology Services! Steve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artschool Posted January 8, 2012 Report Share Posted January 8, 2012 just read a statistic saying 95% of these implants were done privately, only 5% done on the nhs. no way should the tax payer be fixing this problem, if you could afford to pay for them then you can afford to have them removed. if someone dyes their hair and the chemicals make it fall out we wouldn't expect to be paying for a wig? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darebear Posted January 8, 2012 Report Share Posted January 8, 2012 If they were cosmetic then either the cosmetic surgery company pays or the person who paid for them in the first place pays then takes the company to court, why should we have to foot their bill?? I agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAVAGE HMR Posted January 8, 2012 Report Share Posted January 8, 2012 I agree I don't think the NHS should be giving girls breast implants for cosmetic reasons. If it's due to disfigurement then it's a different story. As far as repairing the damage done by private clinics, yes, they have a moral obligation to help anyone in need. It's what they do. But they should be recouping costs through the courts for the reckless work of others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HDAV Posted January 8, 2012 Report Share Posted January 8, 2012 But they should be recouping costs through the courts for the reckless work of others. Of a french company that has gone bankrupt..... NHS should remove the implants if they leak, and if the NHS fitted them should replace them. PIP duped the industry it wasnt the clinics, the patients or surgeons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iced Tiger Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 The breast implants used for medical reasons might well be saline solution ones. I know my wife had a saline one fitted when she had a reconstruction following a breast removal because of cancer. I don't think these ones need removing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crosshair Posted January 9, 2012 Report Share Posted January 9, 2012 No one will get compensation, the French firm that made them have gone Tits Up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.