kdubya Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 (edited) er that will be because she is part of a thieving corrupt club, where these actions are not only common, they are expected. Any other walk of life and she would be sacked, prosecuted and branded a thief. KW http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26865695 Edited April 3, 2014 by kdubya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welsh1 Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 er that will be because she is part of a thieving corrupt club where these actions are not only common they are expected.Any other walk of life she would be sacked prosecuted and branded a thief. KW http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26865695 I can see no argument with your statement,and agree wholeheartedly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Another one caught with their snout at the trough! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scorpius Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 It is highly unlikely that she will be sacked because our dear David is so limited in the number of female politician's available, as with all the others that have been caught they believe they are beyond reproach, but the same would have applied had this been a male MP, I am pleased she is not a UKIP MP because this would have made the headlines in most of the tabloids. Who can we trust?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scully Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Having membership of exclusive clubs does have its perks I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Agree with you KW. What I find hilarious is that Labour are asking for her dismissal. Suggest they take half of their own party too. Vaz through to Kinnock are as bad and lets not mention Andy Pandy Mandy.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gimlet Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Agree with you KW. What I find hilarious is that Labour are asking for her dismissal. Suggest they take half of their own party too. Vaz through to Kinnock are as bad and lets not mention Andy Pandy Mandy.... Labour is in the top slot for parties with the most MPs and Peers sent to prison for financial corruption. If you want a shyster get a socialist. They're the best at it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Labour is in the top slot for parties with the most MPs and Peers sent to prison for financial corruption. If you want a shyster get a socialist. They're the best at it. Which is why I always say I've never met a genuine socialist... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poontang Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 She said sorry, so it's fine by me. It was probably just an honest mistake. I mean we all make mistakes don't we? As long as we apologise that's all that matters....surely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderbird Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 If you want a shyster get a socialist. They're the best at it. It's because socialists are so fond of spending other people's money.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchman Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 the list goes on.....jackie smith....£30k still not paid up......hazel blairs...god knows how much AANNNDDdd she chairs a FRAUD commitee......... i made a mistake over my expenses once for £35 quid.....it was over and around a few staggered holiday days i had so i could fit work in....and got a warning letter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandgun Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 er that will be because she is part of a thieving corrupt club, where these actions are not only common, they are expected. Any other walk of life and she would be sacked, prosecuted and branded a thief. KW http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26865695 I couldn't agree more but will you still think the same if or when UKIP get a large share of seats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted April 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 I couldn't agree more but will you still think the same if or when UKIP get a large share of seats? Of course I will can you please tell me why you think I may not? or are you simply allowing your political bias to form that view? KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted April 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Labour is in the top slot for parties with the most MPs and Peers sent to prison for financial corruption. If you want a shyster get a socialist. They're the best at it. Is it more a case that the cons being the cons stick together a little better when the books are cooked? KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Nope, it's the fact that New communism are just greedier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keg Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Expenses to me are black and white. Were they 100% incurred in the course of your duties. Yes- Claim it. No- don't MIne run to between 2.5 - 4k a month depending on the month and how much travelling I do. In 24 years of having an expense account I have yet to have one queried. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandgun Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Of course I will can you please tell me why you think I may not? or are you simply allowing your political bias to form that view? KW I understood you were a supporter of UKIP, I certainly do not have a political bias other than disrespect for the lot of them, My feelings lie much more in the french republic slogan Liberte fraternite egalite which I thought favoured Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted April 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 I understood you were a supporter of UKIP, I certainly do not have a political bias other than disrespect for the lot of them, My feelings lie much more in the french republic slogan Liberte fraternite egalite which I thought favoured you've seen my avatar, and must be aware of the french revolution? KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandgun Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 you've seen my avatar, and must be aware of the french revolution? KW Of course i'm aware of the french revolution, that why i quoted their slogan, I forgot the word you as in "I thought you favoured" because of your avatar. The words Liberte, Fraternite, Egalite. sum up my thoughts on the way humanity should behave toward each other and why I am sceptical of political parties including UKIP and wonder why you support them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted April 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 Of course i'm aware of the french revolution, that why i quoted their slogan, I forgot the word you as in "I thought you favoured" because of your avatar. The words Liberte, Fraternite, Egalite. sum up my thoughts on the way humanity should behave toward each other and why I am sceptical of political parties including UKIP and wonder why you support them. why? lets think! cons are just that cons, they destroyed the industrial heritage of this country, liebor are more treacherous than guy fawkes and gave MY country away without asking me, and the fluffy lefts want everyone to be as diverse as them well sorry I wont be I want to be as designed by nature not by the left. UKIP offer me the only viable alternative, and I will give them my support in their efforts to change the political map plus of course I want the right to put ENGLISH on my passport and every form I have to fill in that at the moment does not give me that option. ok clear enough or do you want a doctors report and a printout of my PNC history? KW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livefast123 Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 The arrogence of Cameron just sweeping it under the table is staggering. I get my mileage claims scrutinised every month and shock horror have to produce receipts! Unfortunately nobody in the UK has the nadgers for a revolution so we are stuck with what we have and Nige is the best hope of a future for the UK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fisherman Mike Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 In answer to the original posters question... because she was exonerated by an enquiry by the Independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards to which all MP,s have to adhere so essentially she has done nothing wrong. If she had she would have been sacked irrespective of her political bias. Cameron isn't sweeping anything under the table..due process has been served and no Laws have been broken. Would any of us honestly expect to be sacked by our boss following a similar enquiry into a alleged expenses fiddle, where we had been exonerated ? I'm sure we would soon be bleating unfair dismissal if we did... Its just a storm in a tea cup and no doubt Ms Millers electorate will decide, in the democratic way, if she deserves to lose her job.. not some opposition led lynching party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted April 3, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 (edited) In answer to the original posters question... because she was exonerated by an enquiry by the Independent Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards to which all MP,s have to adhere so essentially she has done nothing wrong. If she had she would have been sacked irrespective of her political bias. Cameron isn't sweeping anything under the table..due process has been served and no Laws have been broken. Would any of us honestly expect to be sacked by our boss following a similar enquiry into a alleged expenses fiddle, where we had been exonerated ? I'm sure we would soon be bleating unfair dismissal if we did... Its just a storm in a tea cup and no doubt Ms Millers electorate will decide, in the democratic way, if she deserves to lose her job.. not some opposition led lynching party. ha ha ha ha ha. she did nowt wrong oh lordy lordy they really are ALL the same,here's a couple of snippets from the report but she did nowt wrong? "Frankly if you obstruct, deliberately and calculatedly, a parliamentary inquiry by the independent commissioner into your behaviour and have to apologise to Parliament for so doing, how can you possibly remain in the cabinet, running the country?" It cleared her of making false expenses claims, but said her submission of "incomplete" evidence to the inquiry had breached the MPs' code of conduct. Trouble is they dont seem to have ANY code of conduct other than to truff KW Edited April 3, 2014 by kdubya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fisherman Mike Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 ha ha ha ha ha. KW Sorry whats so funny ? surely you recognise the typically English values of Liberte fraternite egalite so deeply ingrained in UKIPs own doctrine ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fisherman Mike Posted April 3, 2014 Report Share Posted April 3, 2014 ha ha ha ha ha. she did nowt wrong oh lordy lordy they really are ALL the same,here's a couple of snippets from the report but she did nowt wrong? "Frankly if you obstruct, deliberately and calculatedly, a parliamentary inquiry by the independent commissioner into your behaviour and have to apologise to Parliament for so doing, how can you possibly remain in the cabinet, running the country?" It cleared her of making false expenses claims, but said her submission of "incomplete" evidence to the inquiry had breached the MPs' code of conduct. Trouble is they dont seem to have ANY code of conduct other than to truff KW Fundamentally though she was exonerated by the commissioner..as would a UKIP MP if there were any....I would be tempted to consider changing your Avatar as it is exceedingly contradictory and your posts are predominately composed to court controversy...hon y soit qui mal y pense would perhaps be more appropriate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.