Jump to content

Tony Blair's Response


Axe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Received by email today:

 

Thank you for taking the time to register your views about road pricing on the Downing Street website.

 

This petition was posted shortly before we published the Eddington Study, an independent review of Britain's transport network. This study set out long-term challenges and options for our transport network.

 

It made clear that congestion is a major problem to which there is no easy answer. One aspect of the study was highlighting how road pricing could provide a solution to these problems and that advances in technology put these plans within our reach. Of course it would be ten years or more before any national scheme was technologically, never mind politically, feasible.

 

That is the backdrop to this issue. As my response makes clear, this is not about imposing "stealth taxes" or introducing "Big Brother" surveillance. This is a complex subject, which cannot be resolved without a thorough investigation of all the options, combined with a full and frank debate about the choices we face at a local and national level. That's why I hope this detailed response will address your concerns and set out how we intend to take this issue forward. I see this email as the beginning, not the end of the debate, and the links below provide an opportunity for you to take it further.

 

But let me be clear straight away: we have not made any decision about national road pricing. Indeed we are simply not yet in a position to do so. We are, for now, working with some local authorities that are interested in establishing local schemes to help address local congestion problems. Pricing is not being forced on any area, but any schemes would teach us more about how road pricing would work and inform decisions on a national scheme. And funds raised from these local schemes will be used to improve transport in those areas.

 

One thing I suspect we can all agree is that congestion is bad. It's bad for business because it disrupts the delivery of goods and services. It affects people's quality of life. And it is bad for the environment. That is why tackling congestion is a key priority for any Government.

 

Congestion is predicted to increase by 25% by 2015. This is being driven by economic prosperity. There are 6 million more vehicles on the road now than in 1997, and predictions are that this trend will continue.

 

Part of the solution is to improve public transport, and to make the most of the existing road network. We have more than doubled investment since 1997, spending £2.5 billion this year on buses and over £4 billion on trains - helping to explain why more people are using them than for decades. And we're committed to sustaining this investment, with over £140 billion of investment planned between now and 2015. We're also putting a great deal of effort into improving traffic flows - for example, over 1000 Highways Agency Traffic Officers now help to keep motorway traffic moving.

 

But all the evidence shows that improving public transport and tackling traffic bottlenecks will not by themselves prevent congestion getting worse. So we have a difficult choice to make about how we tackle the expected increase in congestion. This is a challenge that all political leaders have to face up to, and not just in the UK. For example, road pricing schemes are already in operation in Italy, Norway and Singapore, and others, such as the Netherlands, are developing schemes. Towns and cities across the world are looking at road pricing as a means of addressing congestion.

 

One option would be to allow congestion to grow unchecked. Given the forecast growth in traffic, doing nothing would mean that journeys within and between cities would take longer, and be less reliable. I think that would be bad for businesses, individuals and the environment. And the costs on us all will be real - congestion could cost an extra £22 billion in wasted time in England by 2025, of which £10-12 billion would be the direct cost on businesses.

 

A second option would be to try to build our way out of congestion. We could, of course, add new lanes to our motorways, widen roads in our congested city centres, and build new routes across the countryside. Certainly in some places new capacity will be part of the story. That is why we are widening the M25, M1 and M62. But I think people agree that we cannot simply build more and more roads, particularly when the evidence suggests that traffic quickly grows to fill any new capacity.

 

Tackling congestion in this way would also be extremely costly, requiring substantial sums to be diverted from other services such as education and health, or increases in taxes. If I tell you that one mile of new motorway costs as much as £30m, you'll have an idea of the sums this approach would entail.

 

That is why I believe that at least we need to explore the contribution road pricing can make to tackling congestion. It would not be in anyone's interests, especially those of motorists, to slam the door shut on road pricing without exploring it further.

 

It has been calculated that a national scheme - as part of a wider package of measures - could cut congestion significantly through small changes in our overall travel patterns. But any technology used would have to give definite guarantees about privacy being protected - as it should be. Existing technologies, such as mobile phones and pay-as-you-drive insurance schemes, may well be able to play a role here, by ensuring that the Government doesn't hold information about where vehicles have been. But there may also be opportunities presented by developments in new technology. Just as new medical technology is changing the NHS, so there will be changes in the transport sector. Our aim is to relieve traffic jams, not create a "Big Brother" society.

 

I know many people's biggest worry about road pricing is that it will be a "stealth tax" on motorists. It won't. Road pricing is about tackling congestion.

 

Clearly if we decided to move towards a system of national road pricing, there could be a case for moving away from the current system of motoring taxation. This could mean that those who use their car less, or can travel at less congested times, in less congested areas, for example in rural areas, would benefit from lower motoring costs overall. Those who travel longer distances at peak times and in more congested areas would pay more. But those are decisions for the future. At this stage, when no firm decision has been taken as to whether we will move towards a national scheme, stories about possible costs are simply not credible, since they depend on so many variables yet to be investigated, never mind decided.

 

Before we take any decisions about a national pricing scheme, we know that we have to have a system that works. A system that respects our privacy as individuals. A system that is fair. I fully accept that we don't have all the answers yet. That is why we are not rushing headlong into a national road pricing scheme. Before we take any decisions there would be further consultations. The public will, of course, have their say, as will Parliament.

 

We want to continue this debate, so that we can build a consensus around the best way to reduce congestion, protect the environment and support our businesses. If you want to find out more, please visit the attached links to more detailed information, and which also give opportunities to engage in further debate.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Tony Blair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be bothered to read that, can someone just give me the jist?

 

Thanks for telling me what you want me, as your elected Prime Minister to do, but B) B) :good:??? I'm going to do what I want......as always.

 

;) Tone :D

 

 

Very nicely put :):no: I take it your a fan of Mr. Blair then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"despite 1.8 million people objecting I will do as I please, we are ploughing ahead with regional 'pilots' anyway despite the obvious public hatred of the idea. By announcing that nothing will happen for 10 years and that we have not actually made a decision (we have though, it will happen) I hope to appease people and make them worry about it nearer the time when it won't be my fault"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, as far as I can make out, that's the third public demonstration that he's just completely ignored. First one was about 600k people objecting to the bloody stupid hunting ban, second one was the anti war thing (about a million people) and this is 1.8m people saying that his ideas are not what they want.

 

That last one was about 2% of the country's population and there seems to be a trend upwards here. I just hope he gets the drift of things soon, but I doubt he will.

 

I really think politicians have lost touch with who they are supposed to represent - us - and are away in their own little worlds doing what they or whoever else wants to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for telling me what you want me, as your elected Prime Minister to do, but :):no: B) B) I'm going to do what I want......as always.

:good: Tone ???

 

Yep that about sums it up.

 

I was always under the impression that democracy was; ‘government of the people, by the people and for the people’ Perhaps someone should remind Mr Bliar and his chums. Hopefully at the next election!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 MILLION for a 1 mile stretch of road :good:

 

What ever happened to using Labourers from Prisons :good:

 

Sounds like the Highways companies just come up with figures from the top of their heads. All they do is add a Lane and just re-surface the others :no:

 

 

Widening the M1 M62 and M25

 

What the hell is wrong with trying to widen the SINGLE LANE antiquated A1 north of Newcastle into a MODERN motorway? OR the A66 which has one of the worst accident records and they STILL won't widen it to Dual :good:

 

While were at it how about the dual carriagway running past the Metrocentre (a HUGE congestion problem)?

 

He could widen that to ease the traffic between Swalwell and the Bowes Incline :good:

 

Anyone else notice a pattern where as the roads down SOUTH seem to be getting favoured where most tourists and of course mr Bliar reside.

 

Roads up my way haven't been updated in a LONG time :no:

 

Sometimes i wonder why the hell i pay road tax full stop as most of the roads here have more craters in them than a spotty teens face :/

 

OR are we simply paying for the Tarmac to build all these incessent speed humps??

 

Perhaps if this Tarmac were used to FILL holes rather than make annoying humps the roads would be a pleasure to drive on.

 

I feel sorry for the poor Secretary who had to type that Email out knowing full well the guy is a Lying so and so.

 

Oh and she ALSO needs to get a spell checker as she spelt his NAME wrong

 

It's

 

Bliar NOT blair :yes:

 

LG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to radio 4 on the drudge home up the m11 tonight I heard John Reid announcing the new "tougher" measures they are implementing.

 

Boils down to creation of a new offence of passing a firearm to a youngster, lowering of the age to 18 at which the minimum 5 year mandatory sentence for gun crime can be handed down.

 

Interestingly there were no draconian measures in his little speech, and refreshingly he admitted that "Legislation alone" would not solve the problem.

 

Some sense for once, mind any worsening of the trouble and I would expect more control type measures to flow, even when they know they won't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...