Jump to content

Help BASC challenge ban on shooting in Wales


Debbie BASC
 Share

Recommended Posts

Help BASC challenge ban on shooting in Wales
 
The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) has launched a dedicated webpage to help challenge the ban on shooting on public land in Wales.
 
The page (https://basc.org.uk/nrw/) allows all residents of Wales to contact their Assembly Member at the click of a button.
 
The page also allows those outside Wales to contact the office of Hannah Blythyn AM and Natural Resources Wales using pre-written text to convey their concerns and disappointment at the decision.
 
BASC Wales director Steve Griffiths said: “The manner in which Hannah Blythyn has interfered in the outcome of an evidence-based consultation and review to impose the will of anti-shooting extremists should be a wake-up call to every shooter.”
 
The organisation is also asking members to watch and share a short film which highlights the economic, employment and social benefits shooting brings to Wales.
 
Please visit: https://youtu.be/zjJJJ68MImg and pass on the link to friends and family, either by email or social media.

Don’t forget to tag in @hannahblythyn and @NatResWales.

ENDS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The responses to this thread thusfar have been removed. 

We have stated before that the instant, kneejerk sledging of reps from shooting organisations who attempt to communicate is no longer welcome on the forum.  If you want to do that, go elsewhere and do it.

Apologies to those whose posts did not fall into the above category, but the simplest thing to do was clear out the lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emails sent, heavily edited to push the"evidence-based policy" argument harder. I have never shot in Wales, and am not likely to, but the process-based argument is a difficult one for the minister to defend.

If the LACS poll suggesting that "71% of people in Wales don't support have shooting anywhere" was soundly run, the NRW report would have included it. The fact that it wasn't even mentioned in the report suggests that the poll was extremely selective, and quite possibly not independently run (and hence inadmissible as contaminated data).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/10/2018 at 20:58, Zapp said:

The responses to this thread thusfar have been removed. 

We have stated before that the instant, kneejerk sledging of reps from shooting organisations who attempt to communicate is no longer welcome on the forum.  If you want to do that, go elsewhere and do it.

Apologies to those whose posts did not fall into the above category, but the simplest thing to do was clear out the lot.

A breath of fresh air well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...