Conor O'Gorman Posted July 29, 2020 Report Share Posted July 29, 2020 In a dramatic intervention by the Czech Republic the European Commission was forced to drop a vote by EU member state representatives on illogical and premature proposals that could have banned the use and possession of lead shot across huge swathes of Europe and the UK in two years’ time. Five years ago the European Commission requested the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to prepare proposals to restrict the use of lead shot over wetlands. Mission creep by officials involved in the process resulted in proposals that went far beyond what was intended. A ban on lead shot over wetlands makes sense, but not with an unworkable broad definition of wetlands was proposed that would cover anything from temporary puddles of water on clay grounds to every moorland in the UK. A ban on the use of lead shot within 100m of wetlands was also proposed and a vague ban on the possession of lead shot when shooting on or within 100m of wetlands. After fierce lobbying on all sides of the lead ammunition debate agreement could not be reached in a Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) committee meeting. To force through a decision EC officials imposed a 21-day written vote for the member state representatives to take part in. Victory for those that wanted a very wide-ranging ban looked certain until the Czech Republic intervened. The Czech Republic, which has a strong shooting tradition, sensible gun laws and government support, used EU procedures to halt the online voting by requesting a reconvened face to face meeting of the REACH committee. It is not certain when the next REACH committee meeting will be held and that might not be until 2021, which provides an opportunity for reflection and a rethink on poorly drafted proposals. As the UK is currently in the transition phase of leaving the European Union, further EU restrictions on lead ammunition will impact us and we have limited lobbying power because our MEPs have already left their positions. BASC continues to give staff and financial support to its European hunting partners to fight against these unworkable proposals. A key part of our support is that we chair the European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE) Ammunition Working Group. BASC will continue to fight against disproportionate and unsubstantiated restrictions on the use of lead ammunition. We have been leading this fight for 40 years. If the EC proposal on restricting lead shot for hunting over wetlands is passed that could lead to further restrictions in the UK within two years and viable alternatives to lead ammunition are simply not yet available in sufficient quantities or calibres either here or in mainland Europe. At the same time, together with eight other UK organisations, we are encouraging a smooth voluntary transition away from the use of lead shot for live quarry over the next five years. These areas of work are not mutually exclusive. In summary we are working to prevent bad laws from entering into force whilst encouraging a five year research and development period for viable alternatives to lead shot for live quarry shooting. See:https://basc.org.uk/voting-shelved-on-europe-wide-lead-shot-ban/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perazzishot Posted July 29, 2020 Report Share Posted July 29, 2020 Who actually writes this utter ***** Connor. You are jumping on the coat-tails of this decision for your own benefit. Show me the evidence you submitted in support of lead to our MEP's over the last 5 years to back up this statement please! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cawdor118 Posted July 29, 2020 Report Share Posted July 29, 2020 @Perazzishot - I agree, @Conor O'Gorman - Its boring, BASC are a joke and you keep celebrating the wins of other people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkom Posted July 31, 2020 Report Share Posted July 31, 2020 On 29/07/2020 at 20:30, Perazzishot said: Who actually writes this utter ***** Connor. You are jumping on the coat-tails of this decision for your own benefit. Show me the evidence you submitted in support of lead to our MEP's over the last 5 years to back up this statement please! Best post you - or most of us - have made 👍 ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zapp Posted July 31, 2020 Report Share Posted July 31, 2020 A number of posts have been removed Personal attacks will not be tolerated on Pigeonwatch. If people have a point to make, make it courteously or not at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker570 Posted August 1, 2020 Report Share Posted August 1, 2020 Thank you Zapp, personal bickering about anything needs sorting quickly on here and fortunately it is rare as well as very boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matone Posted August 1, 2020 Report Share Posted August 1, 2020 Good on the Czechs ,at least one country has some bottle ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markm Posted August 1, 2020 Report Share Posted August 1, 2020 4 hours ago, matone said: Good on the Czechs ,at least one country has some bottle ! Unlike our so called shooting organisation (BASC). But I suppose I can’t pass comment, I voted with my feet and stopped paying a few months ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted August 1, 2020 Report Share Posted August 1, 2020 Just now, markm said: Unlike our so called shooting organisation (BASC). But I suppose I can’t pass comment, I voted with my feet and stopped paying a few months ago. I doubt you are the only one, I jumped years ago! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.