jonno 357 Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Says it all Jonno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 What does Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr W Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 The Oxford English Dictionary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 snigger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garyb Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml...20/njack120.xml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_Sam Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 According to national statistics, Jack was #1 for 2007, and Mohammed #17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floating Chamber Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 I noticed in the article that it said if all the spelling variants were taken into consideration, the name would go from 17th to 2nd place. Could it be that all the white trash girls who get impregnated (and demand housing) by these warriors of Islam can't spell? (And how many female embryos get terminated?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J@mes Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 "Overall, Muslims account for three per cent of the British population, about 1.5 million people" says it all. zzzzzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floating Chamber Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 "Overall, Muslims account for three per cent of the British population, about 1.5 million people" says it all. zzzzzz The ones they know about..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonno 357 Posted January 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Give them £2.5K and they might tell Jonno Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavman Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 I noticed in the article that it said if all the spelling variants were taken into consideration, the name would go from 17th to 2nd place. Could it be that all the white trash girls who get impregnated (and demand housing) by these warriors of Islam can't spell? (And how many female embryos get terminated?) ummm pause for thought Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al4x Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 "Overall, Muslims account for three per cent of the British population, about 1.5 million people" says it all. zzzzzz sounds about right on here, perhaps as we're obviously being over run by them we ought to go back to the good old days when we could shoot them on safari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5matu Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 that annoys me so much this is england Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trakker01 Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 that annoys me so much this is england so be heard, & vote !! as the majority of folk who 'get heard' do !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_Sam Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Neenaw --- incorrect answer. This is actually middle east mkII. A new improve sleeker version where they can all sponge off the state and thus don't have to kill each other. Has no one ever noticed that they don't attack each other over here? Yes in the middle east they are blowing the s### out of each other? Why? Because here the state pays them to sit around, and thus they are happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al4x Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 not in the slightest its because they gain a bit of our civilisation and have no arguments over land etc. You'd need to do a bit of background reading to understand it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullbore Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Im sorry I may have contributed to this a bit, my dog has a teddy bear called mohammed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurcherboy Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 England was built by immigrants some were slaves, some were invited, and it's a richer country for them LB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullbore Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 England was built by immigrants some were slaves, some were invited, and it's a richer country for them LB It probaly was richer til they had all the money out of the benefits system Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floating Chamber Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 (edited) You're probably right, it is richer, before 600 AD. Edited January 16, 2008 by Floating Chamber Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big_Sam Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Well at the end of the day as long as they sit in their bedsits in london and don't trample around on my shoot then they are fine But if they scare off my bunnies.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurcherboy Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Send them all home and watch the NHS and other public services die overnight. Discuss? LB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LEFTY478 Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Send them all home and watch the NHS and other public services die overnight. Discuss? LB Send them all home and where the **** am I gonna get a decent curry, mini cab home or a kebab at three in the morning!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suffolk shooter Posted January 16, 2008 Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 Surely this thread should have been closed and the originator banned if recent similar posts and rulings are to be followed. Regarding the name, did anybody stop to think that as there are more names than just a few for people to name their kids and that with the muslim community they tend to stick to certain names, that that is the reason why Mohammad reached the position it did? SS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markbivvy Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 (edited) Last year, nearly a quarter of a million decent, law-abiding citizens packed their bags and left the capital for good, seeking what they hope will be a better life elsewhere. They moved to outer boroughs, other city suburbs, rural areas, abroad, the back end of beyond, anywhere but here. a snippet from one of the rags. yep its a better place.or so i am told. full story here. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jh...1/16/do1602.xml Edited January 17, 2008 by markbivvy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.