Blackbart Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 It was the biggest single 24 hours ever since the BNP was formed for recruitment. So whether you thought he was good or bad he has in my opinion achieved his aim and more people have pledged to join the party because of it.I say "pledged" because no-one can join untill they change their membership policy and allow people that dont want to join be able to join Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 It was the biggest single 24 hours ever since the BNP was formed for recruitment. So whether you thought he was good or bad he has in my opinion achieved his aim and more people have pledged to join the party because of it.I say "pledged" because no-one can join untill they change their membership policy and allow people that dont want to join be able to join How much is it to join? Can I pay monthly or quarterly? I am sure I can join a party cheaper elsewhere. Probably the SNP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SXPhil Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 It was the biggest single 24 hours ever since the BNP was formed for recruitment. So whether you thought he was good or bad he has in my opinion achieved his aim..... So do you think it`s lots of black, asian, muslim etc. people joining just so they can "Change from within" the party ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paddy Galore! Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 guess we'll find out soon enough, cant really imagine a muslim in 14 hole airwear, red laces and braces! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Imagine if we where back in the 1970 Yes no problem I`m 10 years old QT, Replace BNP with IRA (aka Gery Adams ) and Sinn Fein. Sinn Fein are the political wing of the IRA Look at where we (they are now)! Not bombing ? Unless I am wrong, I have not seen the BNP blowing things up to try and get their way? The bnp aren`t trying to remove British rule from, er, Britain Do you see am comman thread? Relgion!!! No, just paranoia ! Are the bnp a religious party ? I`m totally confused.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackbart Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 How much is it to join? Can I pay monthly or quarterly? I am sure I can join a party cheaper elsewhere. Probably the SNP It's about £30 and they promise not to build a duck island with the money You can join other party's cheaper...Brothers of islam or the communist party seem more "you" Unless i am wrong all partys charge to become a member so dont see why the BNP shouldnt ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zapp Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Replace BNP with IRA (aka Gery Adams ) You mean the entire IRA was just 'Gery' Adams all along? Multitaskingtastic! ZB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveK Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Will they ask for donations on top of membership so they can build a communications centre? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdubya Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 it was recognised a long time ago that some would not see the light? and needed an open mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackbart Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 You mean the entire IRA was just 'Gery' Adams all along? Multitaskingtastic! ZB Dont be silly he had his biaatch mcguinnes to help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SXPhil Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullbore Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 You still don`t get it, this is your quote, don`t prevaricate, just try to understand that one is illegal the other isn`t. Simples.... /quote] Ok then I'll try to make it simple enough for you to grasp, here are the illegal acts, the BNP is NOT illegal Six people have been arrested after protests over BNP leader Nick Griffin's appearance on BBC Question Time. A number of anti-fascist demonstrators earlier broke through a security cordon outside the BBC Television Centre in London. Three police officers sustained injuries during the protest. All were treated at the scene. Assaulting a police officer? VERY illegal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullbore Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 So where are the reports of the "near riots" ? and why no mention of it being a revenge attack, which means someone had attacked the Iraqi`s first, or am I wrong ? So revenge attacks aare alright to you Christians now Henry? What happened to turn the other cheek policy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 it was recognised a long time ago that some would not see the light? and needed an open mind OK one stage at a time............ Prisoners that have spent their whole lives looking at shadows...... 2 things, why are they prisoned from an early age(not a good question, slightly simplistic, but needs answering) if they have just been looking at shadows they will not have language and be able to have rational thought, because they lack socialising skills at "our" level. One is released to the outside world and sees it for the first time as it is in all it`s glory and returns to his friends...... Firstly why did he go back, he didn`t have socializing skills or language, so it is a non starter or he may just have been rendered senseless due to sensory overload etc. If the prisoners had language(basically it wouldn`t be much more than an objective language), they only had it between themselves and would only encompass their world (ie. the cave)and could not be able to describe outside the cave as that is subjective. This is an allegory and as such you will now believe in God. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullbore Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 WHAT???:lol:???:no:? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagsy Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Seems others thought Griffin got a rough time..... "The BBC says it received more than 350 complaints after Mr Griffin's appearance. The bulk of complaints - more than 240 - accused the BBC of being biased against the BNP, the broadcaster revealed" Sky News story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackbart Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 OK one stage at a time............ Prisoners that have spent their whole lives looking at shadows...... 2 things, why are they prisoned from an early age(not a good question, slightly simplistic, but needs answering) if they have just been looking at shadows they will not have language and be able to have rational thought, because they lack socialising skills at "our" level. One is released to the outside world and sees it for the first time as it is in all it`s glory and returns to his friends...... Firstly why did he go back, he didn`t have socializing skills or language, so it is a non starter or he may just have been rendered senseless due to sensory overload etc. If the prisoners had language(basically it wouldn`t be much more than an objective language), they only had it between themselves and would only encompass their world (ie. the cave)and could not be able to describe outside the cave as that is subjective. This is an allegory and as such you will now believe in God. Are you sure your not david ike ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Ok then I'll try to make it simple enough for you to grasp, here are the illegal acts, the BNP is NOT illegalSix people have been arrested after protests over BNP leader Nick Griffin's appearance on BBC Question Time. A number of anti-fascist demonstrators earlier broke through a security cordon outside the BBC Television Centre in London. Three police officers sustained injuries during the protest. All were treated at the scene. Assaulting a police officer? VERY illegal Yes but the fact is what you stated, at that time, was not illegal, but the bnp quote was, don`t add something else to it as that doesn`t work. If you cannot understand that basic fact I am simply wasting my time. So revenge attacks aare alright to you Christians now Henry? What happened to turn the other cheek policy? No I am not the persons concerned and cannot reply for them, however it seems that the IAAE site did not see fit to publish the full report of the Yorkshire Post and omitted the part that said they were retaliating for an earlier attack on one them. I am merely saying that it is understandable for someone to react before thinking. Had it been that the group of asians had turned up and attacked a pub load of brits, then I would expect a similar reaction, I never condoned the action I simply looked at ALL the facts and gave an answer, again I see someone use religion as a cheap shot to further their own needs and to be honest I thought it beneath you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 WHAT???:lol:???:no:? There is a link have a look and think, then have another look at what I said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fullbore Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 (edited) Yes but the fact is what you stated, at that time, was not illegal, but the bnp quote was, don`t add something else to it as that doesn`t work. If you cannot understand that basic fact I am simply wasting my time. No I am not the persons concerned and cannot reply for them, however it seems that the IAAE site did not see fit to publish the full report of the Yorkshire Post and omitted the part that said they were retaliating for an earlier attack on one them. I am merely saying that it is understandable for someone to react before thinking. Had it been that the group of asians had turned up and attacked a pub load of brits, then I would expect a similar reaction, I never condoned the action I simply looked at ALL the facts and gave an answer, again I see someone use religion as a cheap shot to further their own needs and to be honest I thought it beneath you Aaaah Henry, now I understand your ramblings. IT WAS NOT A BNP QUOTE. I simply said if they HAD said it, it would have caused uproar Are you sure you looked at ALL the facts, only earlier in this thread you said you couldn't be bothered through it all. So if you know ALL the facts about the story in question, what is the name of the other Dewsbury boy who was injured in the attack, a fact you should know if you looked at ALL the facts Let he who is without sin cast the first cheap shot Edited October 23, 2009 by fullbore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Are you sure your not david ike ? No, It doesn`t give that name on my ID, passport, FAC/SGC`s, marriage/birth cert, etc. Go back and look at it, it also is an allegory about belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackbart Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 No, It doesn`t give that name on my ID, passport, FAC/SGC`s, marriage/birth cert, etc. Go back and look at it, it also is an allegory about belief. OK i spelled it wrong it is Icke.! It was a load of playdo with and a bit of string,the simpsons have much better graphics. Why would you believe in god after watching that ? ? He come out the cave realised it was afghanistan and dodgy mujahadeen music being played over a speaker and went back in the cave,no great mythical meanings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 Aaaah Henry, now I understand your ramblings. IT WAS NOT A BNP QUOTE. I simply said if they HAD said it, it would have caused uproarAre you sure you looked at ALL the facts, only earlier in this thread you said you couldn't be bothered through it all. So if you know ALL the facts about the story in question, what is the name of the other Dewsbury boy who was injured in the attack, a fact you should know if you looked at ALL the facts Let he who is without sin cast the first cheap shot Firstly you said IF they.... I simply re-iterated your quote and you are again prevaricating. That would be Daniel his stepson. Is this a test or are we just going to add different stories to this thread ? As for Let he who is without sin cast the first cheap shot .....well, just change the Bible to suit yourself, it has nothing to do with cheap shots, it is to do with whether one can judge another in similar circumstances and even after that Jesus asked the woman not to sin again. So yet again I need to ask you not to go off into territory that you no nothing about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry d Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 OK i spelled it wrong it is Icke.! It was a load of playdo with and a bit of string,the simpsons have much better graphics. Why would you believe in god after watching that ? ? He come out the cave realised it was afghanistan and dodgy mujahadeen music being played over a speaker and went back in the cave,no great mythical meanings Plato Have a look, then let us know what you think of things that are not of taxis and shooting ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts