Jump to content

Counting deaths.


AVB
 Share

Recommended Posts

I see that there is now focus on how PHE count the deaths (these are the numbers that are reported on a daily basis). PHE count a death as covid related if the person has tested positive at any time. So somebody could test positive in May, get hit by a bus in July and they would be counted as a covid death. This is ridiculous as it means everyone of the 292,000 people who have tested positive will be counted as a covid death when they eventually die. 
 

no wonder our numbers are supposedly the third highest in the world. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AVB said:

I see that there is now focus on how PHE count the deaths (these are the numbers that are reported on a daily basis). PHE count a death as covid related if the person has tested positive at any time. So somebody could test positive in May, get hit by a bus in July and they would be counted as a covid death. This is ridiculous as it means everyone of the 292,000 people who have tested positive will be counted as a covid death when they eventually die. 
 

no wonder our numbers are supposedly the third highest in the world. 

Have you a link. ? So you are saying if a 2 year old tests positive for VC19 and they die in 80 years time, the cause of death will be listed as CV19.  :hmm:

Edited by ordnance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mungler said:

This tells you everything you need to know

940E9BD9-B9D1-4730-A19F-8D0055DE83DD.png

What does it tell? That the median age is above 80. So what? It doesn't matter since they're old? Or doesn't matter since their life expectancy was reduced "just" by a couple of years!? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More and more stories are emerging of people that have had covid 19 , and got better ,  then suddenly just die , from issues caused by covid 19 . I would guess that this is why the death figures include anyone that has previously tested positive at any point.

Edited to add.

None of us are really safe from covid 19 , some of us are more likely to die from it , and some of us are less likely to die from it , but it would appear that even those that have been previously diagnosed with it aren't safe . 

Edited by mel b3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mel b3 said:

More and more stories are emerging of people that have had covid 19 , and got better ,  then suddenly just die , from issues caused by covid 19 . I would guess that this is why the death figures include anyone that has previously tested positive at any point.

Edited to add.

None of us are really safe from covid 19 , some of us are more likely to die from it , and some of us are less likely to die from it , but it would appear that even those that have been previously diagnosed with it aren't safe . 

Especially if run over by a bus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AVB said:

Especially if run over by a bus. 

I'm going to make an uneducated but common sense guess ,and say that no death by bus , will be recorded as a covid 19 fatality.  Then again , our ways of doing things are often pretty xxxxxx up to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mel b3 said:

I'm going to make an uneducated but common sense guess ,and say that no death by bus , will be recorded as a covid 19 fatality.  Then again , our ways of doing things are often pretty xxxxxx up to say the least.

Not according to PHE. “PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not. PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the COVID test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community. Anyone who has tested COVID positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE COVID death figures.”
 

Totally flawed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AVB said:

Not according to PHE. “PHE regularly looks for people on the NHS database who have ever tested positive, and simply checks to see if they are still alive or not. PHE does not appear to consider how long ago the COVID test result was, nor whether the person has been successfully treated in hospital and discharged to the community. Anyone who has tested COVID positive but subsequently died at a later date of any cause will be included on the PHE COVID death figures.”
 

Totally flawed

They really can't be that stupid , can they ???.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Docleo said:

What does it tell? That the median age is above 80. So what? It doesn't matter since they're old? Or doesn't matter since their life expectancy was reduced "just" by a couple of years!? 

It tells me that the narrow band of people who actually are at risk, aren’t working and can self isolate indefinitely / as need be, whilst the rest of the country gets back to work.
 

A true pandemic cuts through all age groups. I can’t say I’m surprised that everyone under 30 has had enough and are getting out and about.

People forget that the Government has no money of its own and that the NHS is funded by Tax payers (as are all public services and benefits). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

11 minutes ago, Mungler said:

It tells me that the narrow band of people who actually are at risk, aren’t working and can self isolate indefinitely / as need be, whilst the rest of the country gets back to work.
 

A true pandemic cuts through all age groups. I can’t say I’m surprised that everyone under 30 has had enough and are getting out and about.

People forget that the Government has no money of its own and that the NHS is funded by Tax payers (as are all public services and benefits). 

So all these people can self isolate indefinitely.  Its young people going out that catch it, and pass it on to parents grand parents etc.  

People at moderate risk (clinically vulnerable)

People at moderate risk from coronavirus include people who:

  • are 70 or older
  • have a lung condition that's not severe (such as asthma, COPD, emphysema or bronchitis)
  • have heart disease (such as heart failure)
  • have diabetes
  • have chronic kidney disease
  • have liver disease (such as hepatitis)
  • have a condition affecting the brain or nerves (such as Parkinson's disease, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis or cerebral palsy)
  • have a condition that means they have a high risk of getting infections
  • are taking medicine that can affect the immune system (such as low doses of steroids)
  • are very obese (a BMI of 40 or above)
  • are pregnant.
  • People at high risk (clinically extremely vulnerable)

    People at high risk from coronavirus include people who:

  • have had an organ transplant
  • are having chemotherapy or antibody treatment for cancer, including immunotherapy
  • are having an intense course of radiotherapy (radical radiotherapy) for lung cancer
  • are having targeted cancer treatments that can affect the immune system (such as protein kinase inhibitors or PARP inhibitors)
  • have blood or bone marrow cancer (such as leukaemia, lymphoma or myeloma)
  • have had a bone marrow or stem cell transplant in the past 6 months, or are still taking immunosuppressant medicine
  • have been told by a doctor they have a severe lung condition (such as cystic fibrosis, severe asthma or severe COPD)
  • have a condition that means they have a very high risk of getting infections (such as SCID or sickle cell)
  • are taking medicine that makes them much more likely to get infections (such as high doses of steroids or immunosuppressant medicine)
11 minutes ago, Mungler said:

It tells me that the narrow band of people who actually are at risk, aren’t working and can self isolate indefinitely / as need be, whilst the rest of the country gets back to work.
 

A true pandemic cuts through all age groups. I can’t say I’m surprised that everyone under 30 has had enough and are getting out and about.

People forget that the Government has no money of its own and that the NHS is funded by Tax payers (as are all public services and benefits). 

Looks like a pandemic to me. 

 
 
 
 
pandemic
/panˈdɛmɪk/
 
adjective
 
  1. (of a disease) prevalent over a whole country or the world.
Edited by ordnance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Mungler said:

It tells me that the narrow band of people who actually are at risk, aren’t working and can self isolate indefinitely / as need be, whilst the rest of the country gets back to work.
 

A true pandemic cuts through all age groups. I can’t say I’m surprised that everyone under 30 has had enough and are getting out and about.

People forget that the Government has no money of its own and that the NHS is funded by Tax payers (as are all public services and benefits). 

The Spanish flu didn’t kill the young and old it just took the middle band age group 

there’s plenty working that are at high risk 

people forget that the old have given a lot so that the young can have a easier extravagant lifestyle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Old farrier said:

The Spanish flu didn’t kill the young and old it just took the middle band age group 

there’s plenty working that are at high risk 

people forget that the old have given a lot so that the young can have a easier extravagant lifestyle 

I read about the Spanish flu a while back, I wasn't even aware of it till all this broke out, very strange how the middle age band was the most affected. 

That's probably part of the problem now, its effecting mostly the old and ill so the younger groups want to get back to normal,  and are being told to go back to work.

I was told about an incident in the pub last week, some old boy was telling people to keep their distance while others made fun of him, while he was right I've no idea why he would be in a busy pub on a Saturday night at the moment,  of course he has every right to be there but it's not a very sensible choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mice! said:

I read about the Spanish flu a while back, I wasn't even aware of it till all this broke out, very strange how the middle age band was the most affected. 

That's probably part of the problem now, its effecting mostly the old and ill so the younger groups want to get back to normal,  and are being told to go back to work.

I was told about an incident in the pub last week, some old boy was telling people to keep their distance while others made fun of him, while he was right I've no idea why he would be in a busy pub on a Saturday night at the moment,  of course he has every right to be there but it's not a very sensible choice. 

Agreed not a sensible choice although it would appear that the younger generation that were making fun of him have learned nothing in the last 14 weeks 

bearing in mind the young have been paid not to work (probably with a pension fund) good job it’s only killing the expendable part of the population 🙄

 

Edited by Old farrier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Old farrier said:

Agreed not a sensible choice although it would appear that the younger generation that were making fun of him have learned nothing in the last 14 weeks 

bearing in mind the young have been paid not to work (probably with a pension fund) good job it’s only killing the expendable part of the population 🙄

 

I'm sure that's the case for many of those that were out unfortunately,  but it's still the case that many haven't been affected by this virus other than the lockdown and being off work,  kids not in school.

I had to sit through a two hour reset induction type thing this week that all staff are having,  despite only actually missing two weeks work, while that was the first time some have been on site since the lockdown started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mice! said:

I'm sure that's the case for many of those that were out unfortunately,  but it's still the case that many haven't been affected by this virus other than the lockdown and being off work,  kids not in school.

I had to sit through a two hour reset induction type thing this week that all staff are having,  despite only actually missing two weeks work, while that was the first time some have been on site since the lockdown started. 

It’s going to be hard for those who haven’t been working when they have to comply with the new protocols and guidelines perhaps then they will get a realisation of how the people who have worked have already adjusted to the new normal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Old farrier said:

It’s going to be hard for those who haven’t been working when they have to comply with the new protocols and guidelines perhaps then they will get a realisation of how the people who have worked have already adjusted to the new normal 

The new normal is people aren't really keeping their distance,  the first 4-6 weeks back in work people were keeping apart, but the last month I'd say many have relaxed,  just getting on with their job, and carrying on as if nothing is likely to happen,  I realise other places may be different but if people are happy going out getting drunk then they aren't concerned about a virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...