Conor O'Gorman Posted September 28, 2023 Report Share Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) The BBC has published new guidance on the use of social media by its staff and freelancers, but will that stop some presenters from whipping up hate against the shooting community? Click the link below for more information https://basc.org.uk/will-new-bbc-social-media-rules-stop-the-hate/ Edited September 28, 2023 by Conor O'Gorman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weihrauch17 Posted September 28, 2023 Report Share Posted September 28, 2023 They have told to Packham to carry on as is so no, the others will ignore it anyway and get off scott free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted September 28, 2023 Report Share Posted September 28, 2023 Who were the BBC reporters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weihrauch17 Posted September 28, 2023 Report Share Posted September 28, 2023 3 hours ago, oldypigeonpopper said: Who were the BBC reporters? Lineker etc but the text was so wishy washy it was farcical and Packham has been told to carry on as is, the BBC needs defunding by the Taxpayer they are totally Political. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldypigeonpopper Posted September 28, 2023 Report Share Posted September 28, 2023 11 minutes ago, Weihrauch17 said: Lineker etc but the text was so wishy washy it was farcical and Packham has been told to carry on as is, the BBC needs defunding by the Taxpayer they are totally Political. I agree but will it ever happen 🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weihrauch17 Posted September 28, 2023 Report Share Posted September 28, 2023 (edited) 15 hours ago, oldypigeonpopper said: I agree but will it ever happen 🤔 No they are the Govt's woke propaganda machine paid for by the Taxpayer. Edited September 29, 2023 by Weihrauch17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red696 Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 (edited) Not a fan of the BBC or others such as GB news, each push their own agendas and give no true balance to any argument, but it is hardly balanced to say “deserves to be punched repeatedly by everyone”. Firstly, who is everyone? Secondly, “deserves” based on what? It is unlikley things posted on here would make the MSM but imagine if it did…. Guns, violence encouraged blah blah blah. Unlikely to recover much from that scenario, we need to be cleverer than that. Edited September 29, 2023 by Red696 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HantsRob Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 Red, I'd tend to agree. Also if licencing are going to take social media into account and you can be linked to a username, that may be the kind of red flag that would be perceived poorly and potentially inciting violence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGHTCHOKE Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 29 minutes ago, HantsRob said: Red, I'd tend to agree. Also if licencing are going to take social media into account and you can be linked to a username, that may be the kind of red flag that would be perceived poorly and potentially inciting violence. Who'd have thunk it? Social media coming home to roost! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udderlyoffroad Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 18 hours ago, Conor O'Gorman said: , but will that stop some presenters from whipping up hate against the shooting community? The BBC's past actions were to strictly enforce the rules for junior ranks, 'top talent' can do what it likes. Nothing will change here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weihrauch17 Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 5 hours ago, HantsRob said: Red, I'd tend to agree. Also if licencing are going to take social media into account and you can be linked to a username, that may be the kind of red flag that would be perceived poorly and potentially inciting violence. Inciting violence with a tongue in cheek comment that didn't ask anyone to do anything, get a grip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penelope Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 8 minutes ago, Weihrauch17 said: Inciting violence with a tongue in cheek comment that didn't ask anyone to do anything, get a grip. With the woke mentality currently prevalent in the western world, anything is possible. Ask the young girl dragged from her home for saying a copper looked like her lesbian nana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weihrauch17 Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 5 minutes ago, Penelope said: With the woke mentality currently prevalent in the western world, anything is possible. Ask the young girl dragged from her home for saying a copper looked like her lesbian nana. Yep we live in a crazy world that some on here seem to have bought into! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HantsRob Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 2 hours ago, Weihrauch17 said: Inciting violence with a tongue in cheek comment that didn't ask anyone to do anything, get a grip. I think you have missed my point entirely. your comment could be seen as inciting violence, a written sentence can be interpreted different ways. I'm suggesting your comment could be taken tongue in cheek, or as inciting violence. it has nothing to do with being woke, just that people will interpret it differently depending on mood, attitude, persons involved etc. That said, your comment without tone or emoji or similar to differentiate still is showing aggression which could still be read poorly For clarity, I do not think you're inciting violence. But, likewise if brought up in front of a judge I wouldn't feel particularly comfortable explaining why my words are suggesting someone needs physical violence against them. The tone in court would certainly lean unfavourably. As an addition, if it were tongue in cheek and you feel nothing is wrong with the comment, why did you edit it out? I ask in reflection, as I can guess the answer. I'm sorry you felt the need to edit it, I was hoping for some conversation on perspective. But, I also believe you can see how it could be perceived very negatively if reviewed by the police. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weihrauch17 Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 56 minutes ago, HantsRob said: 🙃I think you have missed my point entirely. your comment could be seen as inciting violence, a written sentence can be interpreted different ways. I'm suggesting your comment could be taken tongue in cheek, or as inciting violence. it has nothing to do with being woke, just that people will interpret it differently depending on mood, attitude, persons involved etc. That said, your comment without tone or emoji or similar to differentiate still is showing aggression which could still be read poorly For clarity, I do not think you're inciting violence. But, likewise if brought up in front of a judge I wouldn't feel particularly comfortable explaining why my words are suggesting someone needs physical violence against them. The tone in court would certainly lean unfavourably. As an addition, if it were tongue in cheek and you feel nothing is wrong with the comment, why did you edit it out? I ask in reflection, as I can guess the answer. I'm sorry you felt the need to edit it, I was hoping for some conversation on perspective. But, I also believe you can see how it could be perceived very negatively if reviewed by the police. I took it out so I didn't get more people like you on my back, if my FEO was ever to see this thread he would know it was me who made the comment wouldn't he. Lets hope he has a better sense of humour than you. Lets see if there are mass hordes of people hunting him down tomorrow shall we (sarcasm just so we are clear) . Just to be clear I never asked anyone to do anything so I am inciting absolutely nothing. Like I say get a grip you are beyond ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fellside Posted September 29, 2023 Report Share Posted September 29, 2023 44 minutes ago, Weihrauch17 said: I took it out so I didn't get more people like you on my back, if my FEO was ever to see this thread he would know it was me who made the comment wouldn't he. Lets hope he has a better sense of humour than you. Lets see if there are mass hordes of people hunting him down tomorrow shall we (sarcasm just so we are clear) . Just to be clear I never asked anyone to do anything so I am inciting absolutely nothing. Like I say get a grip you are beyond ridiculous. I’m definitely not taking sides hear - but I think HantsRob was just trying to help you understand how it could be taken out of context. Helpful advice is the way I read it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old man Posted September 30, 2023 Report Share Posted September 30, 2023 On 28/09/2023 at 21:55, oldypigeonpopper said: I agree but will it ever happen 🤔 Agreed, they have become virus like in their attachments to other well thought of institutions, thus ensuring they are difficult to regulate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.