Jump to content

Why aren't 24 and 32 gauge a thing here?


Townie
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think that they are too near what's on either side the same unfortunate fate of the .280 Remington vis a vis .30/06 and .270 WCF or two near something that can do that role AND more besides...so 24 bore vs 20 bore as with .25-06 vs .270 WCF. The guns do come up in auction from time to time and there was one at Holt's some years ago. Also of course I'd say that if the 24 bore being considered weighs anyway as much as a 20 bore of same action type and barrel length there's no benefit and much disbenefit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Smudger687 said:

Inertia - the 20 bore has the lions share of the sub-gauge market and overcoming that is a monumental effort. 

How times change. 
I think I had shot for at least 15 years before I ever saw a 20 bore. 
It was all 12’s, .410’s and the odd 16 back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...