Jump to content

A log question.


Cranfield
 Share

Recommended Posts

We have a multi fuel fire and burn logs on it most of the time.

The logs are well matured, about 16" long and round, they are also complete, ie not split in half.

We light the fire with paper, kindling and when its going well, we put the logs on.

 

My wife thinks I should split the logs into two or three pieces, as they would burn easier (therefore needing less kindling).

I agree they probably would, but I believe they would also burn much quicker.

She now wants me to explain why two halves would burn quicker than one whole log.

 

Am I right ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like you want a rocket scientist on that one or train the Mrs to do what she's told! :blink:

 

On another note just to make sure you've the right logs in the first place chech this...

 

LOGS FOR BURNING

 

 

Beechwood fires are bright and clear if the logs be kept a year.

 

Chestnut’s only good, they say, if for long it’s laid away.

 

Make a fire of elder tree, death within your house shall be.

 

But ash new or ash old is fit for a queen with a crown of gold.

 

Birch and fir logs burn too fast; blaze up bright and do not last.

 

It is by the Irish said, hawthorn bakes the sweetest bread.

 

Elm wood burns like a churchyard mould; e’en the very flames be cold.

 

But ash green or ash brown is fit for a queen with a golden crown.

 

Poplar gives a bitter smoke, fills your eyes and makes you choke.

 

Apple wood will scent your room with an incense-like perfume.

 

Oaken logs, if dry and old, a king shall warm his slippers by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a multi fuel fire and burn logs on it most of the time.

The logs are well matured, about 16" long and round, they are also complete, ie not split in half.

We light the fire with paper, kindling and when its going well, we put the logs on.

 

My wife thinks I should split the logs into two or three pieces, as they would burn easier (therefore needing less kindling).

I agree they probably would, but I believe they would also burn much quicker.

She now wants me to explain why two halves would burn quicker than one whole log.

 

Am I right ?

 

ive got a woodburner to mate and i dont bother splitting unless they are some big cartwheels off a trunk so they will fit in, the smaller the logs the quicker they burn, but on the other hand your wife is right smaller split logs do light easyier but its as broad as it is long, no pun intended.

 

fenman....... :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they will burn faster. If she is still adamant it wont make a difference prove it to her by recording the time it takes to burn a whole log, then tell her that you want to make love but will treat the fire like an egg timer for the duration of sex. then use the same weight of the log in sawdust :blink:

You will have plenty of time for a few pints down the pub :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...