Jump to content

Insurance


steved
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I'm just sorting my insurance for the first time so that i can be covered when I get out. As this will be my first cover and I'm a bit lazy in that I'll probably stay with the first one that I go with I was wondering if anyone had any comments?

 

My feeling (as well as some advice from these pages) has been to go for membership of BASC. However, times are tough and I have a rather large bill to settle with our friends(???) at HMRC, Countryside alliance are doing a deal for the first year membership for 30 quid. Seems quite reasonable but if it's worth searching down the back of the sofa for some more shrapnel let me know.

 

I anticipate to only be out on the pigeons and don't do stalking, lamping or anything like that, shotgun only.

 

Is there any difference between the two, has anyone had to deal with them more than just handing over the hard earned?

 

Ta.

 

Steve

 

PS. There's no way I'd find another thirty quid down the sofa. It'll just have to be a quiet weekend in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with the country cover card. £20 insurance only but offers cover about the same as the big names. The big companies will fight your corner if needed if you get your licence revoked or anything like that but it depends if you feel like paying the extra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was with CCC but this year have taken out BASC. You may find joining BASC is pre-requisite of joining a wildfowling club. Yeah, it's more expensive, but the monthly direct debit makes the bigger fee easier to swallow. Plus, you do get a lot for your money.

 

I'll stick with BASC from now on :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the experience of a couple of people I know,when the wotsit hits the fan so to speak,only BASC will be of any help!

In both instances serious grief was sorted very quickly and professionally !

CA seem disorganised,4 people that I know joined(self included) and were never sent membership renewals !!!!!!Doesn`t give

you much faith in their abilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pay your money take your choice.

 

BASC and CA are different animals (and I am a member of both and pay both by phased DD to spread the cost)

 

CA is a general rural lobby organisation which a big political battle to legalise fox hunting again at its core as well as representing the interests of those who live, work and play in the countryside.

 

BASC is a shooting organisation, everything BASC does is aimed at keeping shooting safe, and that’s what the BASC teams are here to do, political and media lobbying, to represent shooting and shooters interests, as well as operational teams to give practical help and advice to members to find, keep and develop that shooting.

 

Yes there are a range of cheap insurance deals out there, but it needs more than just a £20-£30 insurance package to keep your sport safe!

 

But it’s your cash; spend it where you think it will do the most good. :good:

 

David.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with the country cover card. £20 insurance only but offers cover about the same as the big names. The big companies will fight your corner if needed if you get your licence revoked or anything like that but it depends if you feel like paying the extra.

 

 

I'm with Country Cover Club insurance (CCC3). £20 for the year provides you with cover. Not bad value if cash flow is tight. :good:

 

+1

 

If all you require at this time is insurance and money is tight then this is the way to go.

 

There's no reason you can't join an 'organisation' when you're a bit more flush. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SACS for the last few years. willing to help if you have a problem. £30 covers me, my dogs and not just shooting but fishing as well, all as 3rd party insurance but one never knows when a hook might get someone.hehe.

 

you will find ur 100k legal fees with SACS arnt what they are cracked up to be as ive just recently found out :yes: im a member of BASC as well and at the time of my problem i spoke to them as well but went with SACS cos of the we will fight in court with ur 100k legal fees well that was a fib 2 start with :no: plus even though BASC knew i was going with SACS to help with my problem i still had more helpfull advice from BASC and even follow up emails/phone calls :good: as for SACS not 1 word from them they just hand it to the solicitor and thats it not any useful info or phone calls emails etc etc so just to say the cheaper groups with the big £££££££ legal cover well it isnt what they say it is :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about legal expenses insurance is this, they will usually ONLY take the case if there is a better than 50% chance they will win, AND they can get their costs back.

 

Getting costs awarded against the police is possible, but unlikely, the Courts tend to accept that the police will err on the side of caution and the legal insurance companies know this.

 

Also, if at any time during the process the legal expenses guys think that they may now be on a looser, they can pull out…

 

So, I guess the question is this:

 

Do you need a legal expenses policy as above, that may not be of any real use at all?

 

Or

 

Do you need experienced, expert staff on hand to try and help you and resolve the matter?

 

As I said, it’s your money take your pick.

 

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers for the replies gents. Plenty to think about. Think i might cough up the extra while i'm getting into it and take a view on it after a couple of years. BASC certainly has the public presence that people have heard of which could be useful when knocking on farmers doors for permission.

 

Ta

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all depends on what the clubs policy reads.

 

Most business policies are designed to cover the liability of the business owner, i.e in case they do something or fail to do something that result in an accident causing a third partly loss.

 

I doubt very much the grounds insurance would cover you – why would it cover liabilities that it has little or no control over.

 

 

There has to be proof of liability so, lets look at a couple of simple examples of you shooting at a formal clay shoot.

 

1. You are shooting a driven bird stand and the broken clays fall onto a footpath and someone using the footpath looses an eye. The liability will rest with whoever set up the stand as they had a duty of care to ensure they took reasonable steps to protect the safety of those around them - you are in the clear.

 

2. You are shooting the same stand, after your round you come out of the stand but forget you still have one cartridge in the chamber, as you are putting your gun away and it goes off ,hitting the person next to you in the knee causing significant damage – not the grounds fault in any way – totally yours you are in line for a claim probably in excess of £300,000 damages and lords knows what in legal fees.

 

Both of these are REAL claims by the way

 

Given the range of insurance and benefits offered by the Associations, is it wroth risking shooting without insurance?

 

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...